Singapore has a population density of 21,776 people per square mile compared to 646 people in Uganda. Singapore has 1,282 sq ft of land per person vs 51,875 sq ft in Uganda. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Singapore and Uganda are ranked 2nd and 45th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Singapore has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.0005% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.61% of the population and 0.13% of the land area for Uganda, hence the population density in Singapore is 3,271% higher than in Uganda.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 21,776 ppl/mi² | 646 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 2/197 | 45/197 |
| Population |
6105665
|
52490669
|
| Land area | 277.2 sq mi | 77,421 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,280 sq ft | 43,155 sq ft |
| Rural population | 0% | 72.6% |
| Urban population | 100% | 27.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 97.2% | 3.36% |
Singapore vs Uganda:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Singapore increased by 39%, compared to a 83.5% growth in Uganda.
In 2004, Singapore ranked 2nd for population density and is in 2nd place still. Uganda was 56th in 2004 and ranks 45th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 21,776 | 646 |
| 2023 | 21,346 | 628 |
| 2022 | 20,334 | 611 |
| 2021 | 19,672 | 593 |
| 2020 | 20,510 | 574 |
| 2019 | 20,632 | 555 |
| 2018 | 20,454 | 537 |
| 2017 | 20,415 | 519 |
| 2016 | 20,483 | 501 |
| 2015 | 20,219 | 485 |
| 2014 | 19,981 | 470 |
| 2013 | 19,779 | 456 |
| 2012 | 19,489 | 444 |
| 2011 | 19,071 | 431 |
| 2010 | 18,730 | 418 |
| 2009 | 18,454 | 408 |
| 2008 | 17,906 | 396 |
| 2007 | 17,100 | 384 |
| 2006 | 16,426 | 373 |
| 2005 | 16,035 | 362 |
| 2004 | 15,663 | 352 |
| 2003 | 15,513 | 342 |
| 2002 | 16,023 | 331 |
| 2001 | 15,996 | 321 |
| 2000 | 15,570 | 311 |
| 1999 | 15,303 | 301 |
| 1998 | 15,181 | 291.9 |
| 1997 | 14,674 | 283.3 |
| 1996 | 14,190 | 275.2 |
| 1995 | 13,625 | 267.9 |
| 1994 | 13,217 | 260.7 |
| 1993 | 12,809 | 252.1 |
| 1992 | 12,489 | 243.5 |
| 1991 | 12,119 | 235.3 |
| 1990 | 11,779 | 227.7 |
| 1989 | 11,330 | 220.5 |
| 1988 | 11,002 | 213.5 |
| 1987 | 10,726 | 206.8 |
| 1986 | 10,566 | 200.5 |
| 1985 | 10,576 | 194.7 |
| 1984 | 10,562 | 189.3 |
| 1983 | 10,364 | 184.3 |
| 1982 | 10,230 | 179.8 |
| 1981 | 9,791 | 175.7 |
| 1980 | 9,331 | 172.1 |
| 1979 | 9,214 | 168.5 |
| 1978 | 9,098 | 164.5 |
| 1977 | 8,989 | 160.2 |
| 1976 | 8,865 | 156 |
| 1975 | 8,746 | 152 |
| 1974 | 8,620 | 148.1 |
| 1973 | 8,477 | 144.5 |
| 1972 | 8,320 | 141.1 |
| 1971 | 8,168 | 137.6 |
| 1970 | 8,019 | 133.8 |
| 1969 | 7,896 | 129.8 |
| 1968 | 7,778 | 125.8 |
| 1967 | 7,645 | 122 |
| 1966 | 7,478 | 118.3 |
| 1965 | 7,294 | 114.7 |
| 1964 | 7,119 | 111.3 |
| 1963 | 6,939 | 108 |
| 1962 | 6,766 | 104.9 |
| 1961 | 6,581 | 101.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 100% | 27.4% |
| 2023 | 100% | 26.8% |
| 2022 | 100% | 26.2% |
| 2021 | 100% | 25.6% |
| 2020 | 100% | 25% |
| 2019 | 100% | 24.4% |
| 2018 | 100% | 23.8% |
| 2017 | 100% | 23.2% |
| 2016 | 100% | 22.6% |
| 2015 | 100% | 22.1% |
| 2014 | 100% | 21.5% |
| 2013 | 100% | 21% |
| 2012 | 100% | 20.4% |
| 2011 | 100% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 100% | 19.4% |
| 2009 | 100% | 18.9% |
| 2008 | 100% | 18.4% |
| 2007 | 100% | 17.9% |
| 2006 | 100% | 17.4% |
| 2005 | 100% | 17% |
| 2004 | 100% | 16.5% |
| 2003 | 100% | 16.1% |
| 2002 | 100% | 15.6% |
| 2001 | 100% | 15.2% |
| 2000 | 100% | 14.8% |
| 1999 | 100% | 14.4% |
| 1998 | 100% | 14% |
| 1997 | 100% | 13.6% |
| 1996 | 100% | 13.2% |
| 1995 | 100% | 12.8% |
| 1994 | 100% | 12.5% |
| 1993 | 100% | 12.1% |
| 1992 | 100% | 11.8% |
| 1991 | 100% | 11.5% |
| 1990 | 100% | 11.1% |
| 1989 | 100% | 10.7% |
| 1988 | 100% | 10.3% |
| 1987 | 100% | 9.88% |
| 1986 | 100% | 9.51% |
| 1985 | 100% | 9.15% |
| 1984 | 100% | 8.81% |
| 1983 | 100% | 8.47% |
| 1982 | 100% | 8.15% |
| 1981 | 100% | 7.83% |
| 1980 | 100% | 7.53% |
| 1979 | 100% | 7.36% |
| 1978 | 100% | 7.28% |
| 1977 | 100% | 7.2% |
| 1976 | 100% | 7.12% |
| 1975 | 100% | 7.04% |
| 1974 | 100% | 6.96% |
| 1973 | 100% | 6.89% |
| 1972 | 100% | 6.81% |
| 1971 | 100% | 6.74% |
| 1970 | 100% | 6.66% |
| 1969 | 100% | 6.56% |
| 1968 | 100% | 6.28% |
| 1967 | 100% | 6.01% |
| 1966 | 100% | 5.76% |
| 1965 | 100% | 5.51% |
| 1964 | 100% | 5.27% |
| 1963 | 100% | 5.04% |
| 1962 | 100% | 4.83% |
| 1961 | 100% | 4.62% |
| 1960 | 100% | 4.42% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 100% to 100% in Singapore and from 16.5% to 27.4% in Uganda.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons