Eswatini has a population density of 187.1 people per square mile compared to 50.1 people in Uruguay. Eswatini has 150,387 sq ft of land per person vs 560,081 sq ft in Uruguay. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Eswatini and Uruguay are ranked 119th and 171st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Eswatini has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.12% of the land area for Uruguay, hence the population density in Eswatini is 273.4% higher than in Uruguay.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 187.1 ppl/mi² | 50.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 119/197 | 171/197 |
| Population |
1267161
|
3384690
|
| Land area | 6,641 sq mi | 67,576 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 148,967 sq ft | 556,282 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75% | 4.15% |
| Urban population | 25% | 95.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 38.5% |
Eswatini vs Uruguay:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Eswatini increased by 15.8%, compared to a 3.15% growth in Uruguay.
In 2004, Eswatini ranked 110th for population density and is in 119th place now. Uruguay was 156th in 2004 and ranks 171st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 187.1 | 50.1 |
| 2023 | 185.3 | 50.1 |
| 2022 | 183.5 | 50.2 |
| 2021 | 181.7 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 179.6 | 50.3 |
| 2019 | 177.7 | 50.3 |
| 2018 | 176 | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 174.4 | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 173.1 | 50 |
| 2015 | 172.1 | 49.8 |
| 2014 | 171.1 | 49.7 |
| 2013 | 170.2 | 49.5 |
| 2012 | 169.2 | 49.4 |
| 2011 | 168.3 | 49.2 |
| 2010 | 167.4 | 49.1 |
| 2009 | 166.4 | 49 |
| 2008 | 165.4 | 48.9 |
| 2007 | 164.2 | 48.8 |
| 2006 | 163.3 | 48.7 |
| 2005 | 162.5 | 48.6 |
| 2004 | 161.6 | 48.6 |
| 2003 | 160.6 | 48.6 |
| 2002 | 159.5 | 48.5 |
| 2001 | 158.3 | 48.5 |
| 2000 | 156.8 | 48.3 |
| 1999 | 155.2 | 48.2 |
| 1998 | 153.5 | 47.9 |
| 1997 | 151.6 | 47.7 |
| 1996 | 149.1 | 47.4 |
| 1995 | 146.1 | 47.2 |
| 1994 | 146.2 | 47 |
| 1993 | 146.3 | 46.7 |
| 1992 | 142.1 | 46.5 |
| 1991 | 136.8 | 46.2 |
| 1990 | 131.4 | 45.9 |
| 1989 | 126.2 | 45.7 |
| 1988 | 120.4 | 45.4 |
| 1987 | 115 | 45.1 |
| 1986 | 110.6 | 44.9 |
| 1985 | 106.3 | 44.6 |
| 1984 | 102.5 | 44.4 |
| 1983 | 99.2 | 44.2 |
| 1982 | 96 | 44 |
| 1981 | 92.9 | 43.9 |
| 1980 | 89.8 | 43.7 |
| 1979 | 86.9 | 43.5 |
| 1978 | 84.1 | 43.3 |
| 1977 | 81.4 | 43.1 |
| 1976 | 78.8 | 42.8 |
| 1975 | 76.4 | 42.5 |
| 1974 | 74.2 | 42.2 |
| 1973 | 72.1 | 42 |
| 1972 | 70.1 | 41.8 |
| 1971 | 68.2 | 41.5 |
| 1970 | 66.4 | 41.3 |
| 1969 | 64.7 | 41 |
| 1968 | 63.1 | 40.8 |
| 1967 | 61.6 | 40.4 |
| 1966 | 60 | 40.1 |
| 1965 | 58.5 | 39.7 |
| 1964 | 57 | 39.3 |
| 1963 | 55.7 | 38.8 |
| 1962 | 54.4 | 38.4 |
| 1961 | 53.2 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 25% | 95.9% |
| 2023 | 24.8% | 95.8% |
| 2022 | 24.6% | 95.7% |
| 2021 | 24.4% | 95.6% |
| 2020 | 24.2% | 95.5% |
| 2019 | 24% | 95.4% |
| 2018 | 23.8% | 95.3% |
| 2017 | 23.6% | 95.2% |
| 2016 | 23.5% | 95.1% |
| 2015 | 23.3% | 95% |
| 2014 | 23.1% | 94.9% |
| 2013 | 23% | 94.8% |
| 2012 | 22.8% | 94.7% |
| 2011 | 22.7% | 94.6% |
| 2010 | 22.5% | 94.4% |
| 2009 | 22.3% | 94.2% |
| 2008 | 22% | 94% |
| 2007 | 21.8% | 93.8% |
| 2006 | 21.9% | 93.6% |
| 2005 | 22% | 93.3% |
| 2004 | 22.2% | 93.1% |
| 2003 | 22.3% | 92.8% |
| 2002 | 22.4% | 92.6% |
| 2001 | 22.6% | 92.3% |
| 2000 | 22.7% | 92% |
| 1999 | 22.8% | 91.7% |
| 1998 | 22.9% | 91.5% |
| 1997 | 23.1% | 91.1% |
| 1996 | 22.7% | 90.8% |
| 1995 | 22.3% | 90.5% |
| 1994 | 21.9% | 90.2% |
| 1993 | 21.4% | 89.9% |
| 1992 | 21% | 89.6% |
| 1991 | 20.6% | 89.3% |
| 1990 | 20.2% | 89% |
| 1989 | 19.8% | 88.6% |
| 1988 | 19.4% | 88.3% |
| 1987 | 19% | 87.9% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 87.6% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 87.2% |
| 1984 | 17.9% | 86.9% |
| 1983 | 17.5% | 86.5% |
| 1982 | 17.2% | 86.1% |
| 1981 | 16.8% | 85.8% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 85.4% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 85% |
| 1978 | 15.8% | 84.6% |
| 1977 | 15.5% | 84.2% |
| 1976 | 15% | 83.8% |
| 1975 | 14% | 83.4% |
| 1974 | 13% | 83.2% |
| 1973 | 12.1% | 83% |
| 1972 | 11.3% | 82.8% |
| 1971 | 10.5% | 82.6% |
| 1970 | 9.7% | 82.4% |
| 1969 | 9% | 82.2% |
| 1968 | 8.34% | 82% |
| 1967 | 7.73% | 81.7% |
| 1966 | 7.16% | 81.5% |
| 1965 | 6.49% | 81.3% |
| 1964 | 5.88% | 81.1% |
| 1963 | 5.31% | 80.9% |
| 1962 | 4.8% | 80.7% |
| 1961 | 4.34% | 80.5% |
| 1960 | 3.91% | 80.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 22.2% to 25% in Eswatini and from 93.1% to 95.9% in Uruguay.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Montevideo | 1.3M |
| Salto | 125K |
| Ciudad de la Costa | 112K |
| Rivera | 103K |
| Maldonado | 86.8K |
| Paysandu | 76.4K |
| Tacuarembo | 54.8K |
| Melo | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons