Grenada has a population density of 894 people per square mile compared to 50.1 people in Uruguay. Grenada has 32,005 sq ft of land per person vs 560,081 sq ft in Uruguay. Grenada and Uruguay rank 27th and 173rd by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Grenada has 0.001% of the world's population and 0.0002% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.12% of the land area for Uruguay, making the population density in Grenada 1,686% higher than in Uruguay.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Grenada
|
Uruguay
|
|
| 2026 | 894 | 50.1 |
| 2025 | 894 | 50.1 |
| 2024 | 893 | 50.1 |
| 2023 | 892 | 50.1 |
| 2022 | 891 | 50.2 |
| 2021 | 889 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 886 | 50.3 |
| 2019 | 883 | 50.3 |
| 2018 | 881 | 50.2 |
| 2017 | 879 | 50.1 |
| 2016 | 877 | 50 |
| 2015 | 874 | 49.8 |
| 2014 | 869 | 49.7 |
| 2013 | 864 | 49.5 |
| 2012 | 859 | 49.4 |
| 2011 | 854 | 49.2 |
| 2010 | 850 | 49.1 |
| 2009 | 847 | 49 |
| 2008 | 845 | 48.9 |
| 2007 | 842 | 48.8 |
| 2006 | 839 | 48.7 |
| 2005 | 836 | 48.6 |
| 2004 | 833 | 48.6 |
| 2003 | 829 | 48.6 |
| 2002 | 826 | 48.5 |
| 2001 | 823 | 48.5 |
| 2000 | 819 | 48.3 |
| 1999 | 813 | 48.2 |
| 1998 | 808 | 47.9 |
| 1997 | 802 | 47.7 |
| 1996 | 797 | 47.4 |
| 1995 | 791 | 47.2 |
| 1994 | 786 | 47 |
| 1993 | 780 | 46.7 |
| 1992 | 774 | 46.5 |
| 1991 | 768 | 46.2 |
| 1990 | 761 | 45.9 |
| 1989 | 755 | 45.7 |
| 1988 | 749 | 45.4 |
| 1987 | 743 | 45.1 |
| 1986 | 737 | 44.9 |
| 1985 | 732 | 44.6 |
| 1984 | 727 | 44.4 |
| 1983 | 723 | 44.2 |
| 1982 | 719 | 44 |
| 1981 | 716 | 43.9 |
| 1980 | 720 | 43.7 |
| 1979 | 727 | 43.5 |
| 1978 | 734 | 43.3 |
| 1977 | 739 | 43.1 |
| 1976 | 744 | 42.8 |
| 1975 | 747 | 42.5 |
| 1974 | 750 | 42.2 |
| 1973 | 752 | 42 |
| 1972 | 752 | 41.8 |
| 1971 | 751 | 41.5 |
| 1970 | 750 | 41.3 |
| 1969 | 748 | 41 |
| 1968 | 747 | 40.8 |
| 1967 | 747 | 40.4 |
| 1966 | 747 | 40.1 |
| 1965 | 747 | 39.7 |
| 1964 | 745 | 39.3 |
| 1963 | 740 | 38.8 |
| 1962 | 734 | 38.4 |
| 1961 | 726 | 37.9 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/grenada/uruguay | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Grenada increased by 6.6%, compared to a 2.84% growth in Uruguay.
In 2006, Grenada ranked 26th by population density and is 27th now. Uruguay was 158th in 2006 and ranks 173rd out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Grenada
|
Uruguay
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 894 ppl/mi² | 50.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 27/197 | 173/197 |
| Population |
117407
|
3382789
|
| Land area | 131.3 sq mi | 67,576 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 31,224 sq ft | 556,282 sq ft |
| Rural population | 63.4% | 4.4% |
| Urban population | 36.6% | 95.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 38.5% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Grenada
|
Uruguay
|
|
| 2024 | 36.6% | 95.6% |
| 2023 | 36.5% | 95.5% |
| 2022 | 36.4% | 95.5% |
| 2021 | 36.3% | 95.4% |
| 2020 | 36.2% | 95.4% |
| 2019 | 36.1% | 95.3% |
| 2018 | 36.1% | 95.3% |
| 2017 | 36% | 95.2% |
| 2016 | 36% | 95.2% |
| 2015 | 35.9% | 95.1% |
| 2014 | 35.9% | 95% |
| 2013 | 35.9% | 94.9% |
| 2012 | 35.9% | 94.8% |
| 2011 | 35.9% | 94.6% |
| 2010 | 35.9% | 94.3% |
| 2009 | 35.9% | 93.9% |
| 2008 | 35.9% | 93.5% |
| 2007 | 35.9% | 93% |
| 2006 | 35.9% | 92.5% |
| 2005 | 35.9% | 92.1% |
| 2004 | 35.9% | 91.8% |
| 2003 | 35.9% | 91.6% |
| 2002 | 35.9% | 91.5% |
| 2001 | 35.9% | 91.4% |
| 2000 | 35.9% | 91.3% |
| 1999 | 35.7% | 91.2% |
| 1998 | 35.5% | 91.1% |
| 1997 | 35.2% | 91% |
| 1996 | 34.8% | 90.8% |
| 1995 | 34.5% | 90.6% |
| 1994 | 34.2% | 90.4% |
| 1993 | 33.9% | 90.1% |
| 1992 | 33.6% | 89.8% |
| 1991 | 33.5% | 89.4% |
| 1990 | 33.4% | 89.1% |
| 1989 | 33.3% | 88.7% |
| 1988 | 33.3% | 88.3% |
| 1987 | 33.2% | 88% |
| 1986 | 33.2% | 87.6% |
| 1985 | 33.2% | 87.2% |
| 1984 | 33.1% | 86.8% |
| 1983 | 33.1% | 86.4% |
| 1982 | 33% | 85.9% |
| 1981 | 33% | 85.5% |
| 1980 | 32.9% | 85% |
| 1979 | 32.9% | 84.5% |
| 1978 | 32.8% | 84.1% |
| 1977 | 32.7% | 83.7% |
| 1976 | 32.7% | 83.3% |
| 1975 | 32.6% | 83% |
| 1974 | 32.6% | 82.8% |
| 1973 | 32.5% | 82.6% |
| 1972 | 32.4% | 82.3% |
| 1971 | 32.3% | 82.2% |
| 1970 | 32.2% | 82% |
| 1969 | 32.1% | 81.8% |
| 1968 | 32% | 81.6% |
| 1967 | 31.8% | 81.5% |
| 1966 | 31.6% | 81.3% |
| 1965 | 31.4% | 81.1% |
| 1964 | 31.2% | 81% |
| 1963 | 31% | 80.8% |
| 1962 | 30.8% | 80.6% |
| 1961 | 30.6% | 80.4% |
| 1960 | 30.4% | 80.2% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/grenada/uruguay | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 35.9% to 36.6% in Grenada and from 91.8% to 95.6% in Uruguay.
Densely populated cities
|
Uruguay
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Montevideo | 1.3M |
| Salto | 125K |
| Ciudad de la Costa | 112K |
| Maldonado | 86.8K |
| Rivera | 84.8K |
| Paysandu | 76.4K |
| Tacuarembo | 54.8K |
| Melo | 51.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/grenada/uruguay | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2011–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.