New Zealand has a population density of 52.5 people per square mile compared to 833 people in Tuvalu. New Zealand has 540,405 sq ft of land per person vs 28,054 sq ft in Tuvalu. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, New Zealand and Tuvalu are ranked 168th and 31st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. New Zealand has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.18% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0001% of the population and 0.00002% of the land area for Tuvalu, hence the population density in New Zealand is 93.7% lower than in Tuvalu.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 52.5 ppl/mi² | 833 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 168/197 | 31/197 |
| Population |
5406623
|
9493
|
| Land area | 101,665 sq mi | 11.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 530,907 sq ft | 33,477 sq ft |
| Rural population | 12.9% | 33.1% |
| Urban population | 87.1% | 66.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 27.5% | 0% |
New Zealand vs Tuvalu:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in New Zealand increased by 30.6%, compared to a 1.73% decline in Tuvalu.
In 2004, New Zealand ranked 162nd for population density and is in 168th place now. Tuvalu was 21st in 2004 and ranks 31st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 52.5 | 833 |
| 2023 | 51.6 | 847 |
| 2022 | 50.3 | 863 |
| 2021 | 50.3 | 880 |
| 2020 | 50.1 | 898 |
| 2019 | 49 | 913 |
| 2018 | 48.2 | 928 |
| 2017 | 47.3 | 938 |
| 2016 | 46.4 | 944 |
| 2015 | 45.3 | 946 |
| 2014 | 44.4 | 948 |
| 2013 | 43.7 | 950 |
| 2012 | 43.4 | 944 |
| 2011 | 43.1 | 931 |
| 2010 | 42.8 | 916 |
| 2009 | 42.3 | 903 |
| 2008 | 41.9 | 891 |
| 2007 | 41.5 | 879 |
| 2006 | 41.2 | 868 |
| 2005 | 40.7 | 858 |
| 2004 | 40.2 | 847 |
| 2003 | 39.6 | 837 |
| 2002 | 38.8 | 831 |
| 2001 | 38.2 | 828 |
| 2000 | 37.9 | 824 |
| 1999 | 37.7 | 820 |
| 1998 | 37.5 | 816 |
| 1997 | 37.2 | 812 |
| 1996 | 36.7 | 807 |
| 1995 | 36.1 | 801 |
| 1994 | 35.6 | 795 |
| 1993 | 35.1 | 788 |
| 1992 | 34.7 | 780 |
| 1991 | 34.4 | 771 |
| 1990 | 32.8 | 760 |
| 1989 | 32.5 | 748 |
| 1988 | 32.3 | 735 |
| 1987 | 32.2 | 723 |
| 1986 | 31.9 | 709 |
| 1985 | 31.9 | 695 |
| 1984 | 31.7 | 682 |
| 1983 | 31.5 | 672 |
| 1982 | 31 | 662 |
| 1981 | 30.7 | 650 |
| 1980 | 30.6 | 636 |
| 1979 | 30.6 | 620 |
| 1978 | 30.7 | 601 |
| 1977 | 30.7 | 577 |
| 1976 | 30.6 | 553 |
| 1975 | 30.3 | 528 |
| 1974 | 29.7 | 503 |
| 1973 | 29.1 | 490 |
| 1972 | 28.6 | 491 |
| 1971 | 28.1 | 491 |
| 1970 | 27.6 | 489 |
| 1969 | 27.3 | 486 |
| 1968 | 27 | 486 |
| 1967 | 26.8 | 488 |
| 1966 | 26.3 | 491 |
| 1965 | 25.9 | 493 |
| 1964 | 25.4 | 497 |
| 1963 | 24.9 | 497 |
| 1962 | 24.4 | 492 |
| 1961 | 23.8 | 488 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 87.1% | 66.9% |
| 2023 | 87% | 66.2% |
| 2022 | 86.9% | 65.5% |
| 2021 | 86.8% | 64.8% |
| 2020 | 86.7% | 64% |
| 2019 | 86.6% | 63.2% |
| 2018 | 86.5% | 62.4% |
| 2017 | 86.5% | 61.5% |
| 2016 | 86.4% | 60.6% |
| 2015 | 86.3% | 59.7% |
| 2014 | 86.3% | 58.8% |
| 2013 | 86.2% | 57.8% |
| 2012 | 86.2% | 56.8% |
| 2011 | 86.1% | 55.8% |
| 2010 | 86.2% | 54.8% |
| 2009 | 86.2% | 53.8% |
| 2008 | 86.3% | 52.8% |
| 2007 | 86.3% | 51.7% |
| 2006 | 86.4% | 50.7% |
| 2005 | 86.3% | 49.7% |
| 2004 | 86.3% | 48.7% |
| 2003 | 86.2% | 47.7% |
| 2002 | 86.2% | 46.8% |
| 2001 | 86.1% | 46.4% |
| 2000 | 86% | 46% |
| 1999 | 85.9% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 85.9% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 85.8% | 44.8% |
| 1996 | 85.7% | 44.4% |
| 1995 | 85.6% | 44% |
| 1994 | 85.4% | 43.6% |
| 1993 | 85.3% | 43.2% |
| 1992 | 85.1% | 42.8% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 42% |
| 1990 | 84.7% | 40.7% |
| 1989 | 84.5% | 39.3% |
| 1988 | 84.3% | 38% |
| 1987 | 84% | 36.8% |
| 1986 | 83.8% | 35.5% |
| 1985 | 83.7% | 34.3% |
| 1984 | 83.6% | 33.3% |
| 1983 | 83.6% | 32.4% |
| 1982 | 83.6% | 31.6% |
| 1981 | 83.5% | 30.7% |
| 1980 | 83.4% | 29.8% |
| 1979 | 83.3% | 29% |
| 1978 | 83.2% | 28.2% |
| 1977 | 83.1% | 27.3% |
| 1976 | 83% | 26.5% |
| 1975 | 82.8% | 25.8% |
| 1974 | 82.5% | 25% |
| 1973 | 82.1% | 24.2% |
| 1972 | 81.8% | 23.5% |
| 1971 | 81.5% | 22.8% |
| 1970 | 81.1% | 22.1% |
| 1969 | 80.7% | 21.4% |
| 1968 | 80.3% | 20.7% |
| 1967 | 79.9% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 79.4% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 78.9% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 78.3% | 18.2% |
| 1963 | 77.7% | 17.6% |
| 1962 | 77.1% | 17% |
| 1961 | 76.5% | 16.4% |
| 1960 | 76% | 15.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand and from 48.7% to 66.9% in Tuvalu.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons