Sweden has a population density of 67.2 people per square mile compared to 833 people in Tuvalu. Sweden has 455,646 sq ft of land per person vs 28,054 sq ft in Tuvalu. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sweden and Tuvalu are ranked 163rd and 31st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sweden has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.27% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0001% of the population and 0.00002% of the land area for Tuvalu, hence the population density in Sweden is 91.9% lower than in Tuvalu.
Population density comparison
Sweden
|
Tuvalu
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 67.2 ppl/mi² | 833 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 163/197 | 31/197 |
| Population |
10654722
|
9493
|
| Land area | 157,248 sq mi | 11.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 414,753 sq ft | 33,477 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 33.1% |
| Urban population | 89% | 66.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sweden vs Tuvalu:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sweden increased by 17.5%, compared to a 1.73% decline in Tuvalu.
In 2004, Sweden ranked 151st for population density and is in 163rd place now. Tuvalu was 21st in 2004 and ranks 31st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sweden
|
Tuvalu
|
|
| 2024 | 67.2 | 833 |
| 2023 | 67 | 847 |
| 2022 | 66.7 | 863 |
| 2021 | 66.2 | 880 |
| 2020 | 65.8 | 898 |
| 2019 | 65.4 | 913 |
| 2018 | 64.7 | 928 |
| 2017 | 64 | 938 |
| 2016 | 63.1 | 944 |
| 2015 | 62.3 | 946 |
| 2014 | 61.7 | 948 |
| 2013 | 61 | 950 |
| 2012 | 60.5 | 944 |
| 2011 | 60.1 | 931 |
| 2010 | 59.6 | 916 |
| 2009 | 59.1 | 903 |
| 2008 | 58.6 | 891 |
| 2007 | 58.2 | 879 |
| 2006 | 57.7 | 868 |
| 2005 | 57.4 | 858 |
| 2004 | 57.2 | 847 |
| 2003 | 57 | 837 |
| 2002 | 56.7 | 831 |
| 2001 | 56.6 | 828 |
| 2000 | 56.4 | 824 |
| 1999 | 56.3 | 820 |
| 1998 | 56.3 | 816 |
| 1997 | 56.2 | 812 |
| 1996 | 56.2 | 807 |
| 1995 | 56.1 | 801 |
| 1994 | 55.8 | 795 |
| 1993 | 55.4 | 788 |
| 1992 | 55.1 | 780 |
| 1991 | 54.8 | 771 |
| 1990 | 54.4 | 760 |
| 1989 | 54 | 748 |
| 1988 | 53.6 | 735 |
| 1987 | 53.4 | 723 |
| 1986 | 53.2 | 709 |
| 1985 | 53.1 | 695 |
| 1984 | 53 | 682 |
| 1983 | 53 | 672 |
| 1982 | 52.9 | 662 |
| 1981 | 52.9 | 650 |
| 1980 | 52.8 | 636 |
| 1979 | 52.7 | 620 |
| 1978 | 52.6 | 601 |
| 1977 | 52.5 | 577 |
| 1976 | 52.3 | 553 |
| 1975 | 52.1 | 528 |
| 1974 | 51.9 | 503 |
| 1973 | 51.7 | 490 |
| 1972 | 51.6 | 491 |
| 1971 | 51.5 | 491 |
| 1970 | 51.1 | 489 |
| 1969 | 50.7 | 486 |
| 1968 | 50.3 | 486 |
| 1967 | 50 | 488 |
| 1966 | 49.6 | 491 |
| 1965 | 49.2 | 493 |
| 1964 | 48.7 | 497 |
| 1963 | 48.4 | 497 |
| 1962 | 48.1 | 492 |
| 1961 | 47.8 | 488 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sweden
|
Tuvalu
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 66.9% |
| 2023 | 88.7% | 66.2% |
| 2022 | 88.5% | 65.5% |
| 2021 | 88.2% | 64.8% |
| 2020 | 88% | 64% |
| 2019 | 87.7% | 63.2% |
| 2018 | 87.4% | 62.4% |
| 2017 | 87.1% | 61.5% |
| 2016 | 86.9% | 60.6% |
| 2015 | 86.6% | 59.7% |
| 2014 | 86.2% | 58.8% |
| 2013 | 85.9% | 57.8% |
| 2012 | 85.6% | 56.8% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 55.8% |
| 2010 | 85.1% | 54.8% |
| 2009 | 84.9% | 53.8% |
| 2008 | 84.7% | 52.8% |
| 2007 | 84.6% | 51.7% |
| 2006 | 84.4% | 50.7% |
| 2005 | 84.3% | 49.7% |
| 2004 | 84.3% | 48.7% |
| 2003 | 84.2% | 47.7% |
| 2002 | 84.1% | 46.8% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 46.4% |
| 2000 | 84% | 46% |
| 1999 | 84% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 84% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 83.9% | 44.8% |
| 1996 | 83.9% | 44.4% |
| 1995 | 83.8% | 44% |
| 1994 | 83.7% | 43.6% |
| 1993 | 83.5% | 43.2% |
| 1992 | 83.4% | 42.8% |
| 1991 | 83.2% | 42% |
| 1990 | 83.1% | 40.7% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 39.3% |
| 1988 | 83.1% | 38% |
| 1987 | 83.1% | 36.8% |
| 1986 | 83.1% | 35.5% |
| 1985 | 83.1% | 34.3% |
| 1984 | 83.1% | 33.3% |
| 1983 | 83.1% | 32.4% |
| 1982 | 83.1% | 31.6% |
| 1981 | 83.1% | 30.7% |
| 1980 | 83.1% | 29.8% |
| 1979 | 83% | 29% |
| 1978 | 82.9% | 28.2% |
| 1977 | 82.9% | 27.3% |
| 1976 | 82.8% | 26.5% |
| 1975 | 82.7% | 25.8% |
| 1974 | 82.5% | 25% |
| 1973 | 82.2% | 24.2% |
| 1972 | 81.9% | 23.5% |
| 1971 | 81.6% | 22.8% |
| 1970 | 81% | 22.1% |
| 1969 | 80.3% | 21.4% |
| 1968 | 79.5% | 20.7% |
| 1967 | 78.7% | 20.1% |
| 1966 | 77.9% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 77.1% | 18.8% |
| 1964 | 76.2% | 18.2% |
| 1963 | 75.2% | 17.6% |
| 1962 | 74.3% | 17% |
| 1961 | 73.3% | 16.4% |
| 1960 | 72.5% | 15.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden and from 48.7% to 66.9% in Tuvalu.
Densely populated cities
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
