Mali has a population density of 55.1 people per square mile compared to 152.8 people in Nicaragua. Mali has 545,346 sq ft of land per person vs 187,291 sq ft in Nicaragua. Mali and Nicaragua rank 167th and 131st by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mali has 0.3% of the world's population and 0.82% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.09% of the population and 0.08% of the land area for Nicaragua, making the population density in Mali 64% lower than in Nicaragua.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Mali
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2026 | 55.1 | 152.8 |
| 2025 | 53.5 | 150.8 |
| 2024 | 52 | 148.9 |
| 2023 | 50.5 | 146.9 |
| 2022 | 49 | 144.9 |
| 2021 | 47.5 | 143 |
| 2020 | 46.1 | 141.3 |
| 2019 | 44.7 | 139.5 |
| 2018 | 43.4 | 137.7 |
| 2017 | 42.1 | 135.9 |
| 2016 | 40.7 | 134.1 |
| 2015 | 39.5 | 132.3 |
| 2014 | 38.3 | 130.6 |
| 2013 | 37.1 | 128.8 |
| 2012 | 36 | 127 |
| 2011 | 35 | 125.2 |
| 2010 | 33.8 | 123.5 |
| 2009 | 32.8 | 121.7 |
| 2008 | 31.7 | 120 |
| 2007 | 30.7 | 118.3 |
| 2006 | 29.7 | 116.6 |
| 2005 | 28.7 | 115 |
| 2004 | 27.8 | 113.5 |
| 2003 | 26.9 | 112.2 |
| 2002 | 26.1 | 110.8 |
| 2001 | 25.3 | 109.5 |
| 2000 | 24.5 | 108.1 |
| 1999 | 23.8 | 106.6 |
| 1998 | 23.2 | 105.1 |
| 1997 | 22.6 | 103.5 |
| 1996 | 22.1 | 101.8 |
| 1995 | 21.6 | 99.9 |
| 1994 | 21.2 | 97.9 |
| 1993 | 20.7 | 95.9 |
| 1992 | 20.3 | 93.8 |
| 1991 | 19.9 | 91.7 |
| 1990 | 19.5 | 89.6 |
| 1989 | 19.1 | 87.5 |
| 1988 | 18.8 | 85.5 |
| 1987 | 18.4 | 83.6 |
| 1986 | 18.1 | 81.7 |
| 1985 | 17.8 | 79.8 |
| 1984 | 17.4 | 77.9 |
| 1983 | 17.1 | 76 |
| 1982 | 16.7 | 74 |
| 1981 | 16.3 | 72 |
| 1980 | 16 | 70 |
| 1979 | 15.7 | 68.1 |
| 1978 | 15.3 | 66.3 |
| 1977 | 15.1 | 64.4 |
| 1976 | 14.8 | 62.5 |
| 1975 | 14.5 | 60.6 |
| 1974 | 14.3 | 58.8 |
| 1973 | 14 | 57 |
| 1972 | 13.8 | 55.4 |
| 1971 | 13.5 | 53.8 |
| 1970 | 13.3 | 52.1 |
| 1969 | 13.1 | 50.5 |
| 1968 | 12.9 | 49 |
| 1967 | 12.7 | 47.5 |
| 1966 | 12.5 | 46 |
| 1965 | 12.3 | 44.6 |
| 1964 | 12.2 | 43.3 |
| 1963 | 12 | 42 |
| 1962 | 11.8 | 40.7 |
| 1961 | 11.6 | 39.5 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/mali/nicaragua | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Mali increased by 85.4%, compared to a 31% growth in Nicaragua.
In 2006, Mali ranked 173rd by population density and is 167th now. Nicaragua was 131st in 2006 and still ranks 131st out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Mali
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 55.1 ppl/mi² | 152.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 167/197 | 131/197 |
| Population |
26143152
|
7124343
|
| Land area | 471,118 sq mi | 46,464 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 536,551 sq ft | 187,291 sq ft |
| Rural population | 68.4% | 40.7% |
| Urban population | 31.6% | 59.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 16.2% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Mali
|
Nicaragua
|
|
| 2024 | 31.6% | 59.3% |
| 2023 | 31% | 59.1% |
| 2022 | 30.4% | 59% |
| 2021 | 29.7% | 58.9% |
| 2020 | 29% | 58.7% |
| 2019 | 28.4% | 58.5% |
| 2018 | 27.7% | 58.4% |
| 2017 | 27.1% | 58.2% |
| 2016 | 26.4% | 58% |
| 2015 | 25.8% | 57.8% |
| 2014 | 25.3% | 57.6% |
| 2013 | 24.7% | 57.4% |
| 2012 | 24.2% | 57.2% |
| 2011 | 23.6% | 57% |
| 2010 | 23.1% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 22.7% | 56.7% |
| 2008 | 22.2% | 56.5% |
| 2007 | 21.7% | 56.3% |
| 2006 | 21.3% | 56.1% |
| 2005 | 20.9% | 55.9% |
| 2004 | 20.5% | 55.8% |
| 2003 | 20.1% | 55.6% |
| 2002 | 19.7% | 55.5% |
| 2001 | 19.3% | 55.4% |
| 2000 | 19% | 55.2% |
| 1999 | 18.7% | 55.1% |
| 1998 | 18.4% | 54.9% |
| 1997 | 18.1% | 54.8% |
| 1996 | 17.8% | 54.6% |
| 1995 | 17.6% | 54.4% |
| 1994 | 17.4% | 54.3% |
| 1993 | 17.2% | 54.1% |
| 1992 | 17% | 53.9% |
| 1991 | 16.8% | 53.7% |
| 1990 | 16.6% | 53.5% |
| 1989 | 16.4% | 53.3% |
| 1988 | 16.2% | 53.1% |
| 1987 | 16% | 52.9% |
| 1986 | 15.7% | 52.7% |
| 1985 | 15.5% | 52.4% |
| 1984 | 15.2% | 52.2% |
| 1983 | 14.9% | 51.9% |
| 1982 | 14.6% | 51.7% |
| 1981 | 14.3% | 51.4% |
| 1980 | 14% | 51.1% |
| 1979 | 13.8% | 50.8% |
| 1978 | 13.4% | 50.5% |
| 1977 | 13.1% | 50.2% |
| 1976 | 12.8% | 49.8% |
| 1975 | 12.5% | 49.5% |
| 1974 | 12.2% | 49.1% |
| 1973 | 11.8% | 48.7% |
| 1972 | 11.5% | 48.3% |
| 1971 | 11.1% | 47.8% |
| 1970 | 10.8% | 47.3% |
| 1969 | 10.4% | 46.5% |
| 1968 | 10% | 45.6% |
| 1967 | 9.62% | 44.6% |
| 1966 | 9.23% | 43.6% |
| 1965 | 8.85% | 42.6% |
| 1964 | 8.47% | 41.7% |
| 1963 | 8.1% | 41% |
| 1962 | 7.73% | 40.4% |
| 1961 | 7.37% | 39.8% |
| 1960 | 7.02% | 39.2% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/mali/nicaragua | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 20.5% to 31.6% in Mali and from 55.8% to 59.3% in Nicaragua.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/mali/nicaragua | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2005–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.