Liberia has a population density of 157.4 people per square mile compared to 9.93 people in Namibia. Liberia has 213,577 sq ft of land per person vs 2,932,826 sq ft in Namibia. Liberia and Namibia rank 130th and 195th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Liberia has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.06% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.55% of the land area for Namibia, making the population density in Liberia 1,485% higher than in Namibia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Liberia
|
Namibia
|
|
| 2026 | 157.4 | 9.93 |
| 2025 | 154.2 | 9.74 |
| 2024 | 150.9 | 9.53 |
| 2023 | 147.7 | 9.32 |
| 2022 | 144.5 | 9.09 |
| 2021 | 141.4 | 8.84 |
| 2020 | 138.5 | 8.58 |
| 2019 | 135.6 | 8.34 |
| 2018 | 133 | 8.11 |
| 2017 | 130.4 | 7.89 |
| 2016 | 127.9 | 7.67 |
| 2015 | 125.3 | 7.47 |
| 2014 | 122.7 | 7.27 |
| 2013 | 120.2 | 7.09 |
| 2012 | 117.6 | 6.9 |
| 2011 | 113.5 | 6.75 |
| 2010 | 109.1 | 6.64 |
| 2009 | 106 | 6.54 |
| 2008 | 102.7 | 6.44 |
| 2007 | 98.7 | 6.35 |
| 2006 | 93.9 | 6.27 |
| 2005 | 88.8 | 6.19 |
| 2004 | 84.9 | 6.11 |
| 2003 | 83.9 | 6.03 |
| 2002 | 83.2 | 5.95 |
| 2001 | 81.1 | 5.84 |
| 2000 | 78.7 | 5.72 |
| 1999 | 75.9 | 5.59 |
| 1998 | 71.8 | 5.45 |
| 1997 | 64.9 | 5.31 |
| 1996 | 60 | 5.18 |
| 1995 | 58.3 | 5.04 |
| 1994 | 57.8 | 4.9 |
| 1993 | 58 | 4.75 |
| 1992 | 55.7 | 4.6 |
| 1991 | 52.6 | 4.45 |
| 1990 | 59.8 | 4.31 |
| 1989 | 67.7 | 4.05 |
| 1988 | 65.8 | 3.81 |
| 1987 | 63.9 | 3.67 |
| 1986 | 62.1 | 3.56 |
| 1985 | 60.2 | 3.45 |
| 1984 | 58.4 | 3.35 |
| 1983 | 56.7 | 3.26 |
| 1982 | 55 | 3.18 |
| 1981 | 53.4 | 3.12 |
| 1980 | 51.9 | 3.09 |
| 1979 | 50.4 | 3.03 |
| 1978 | 48.9 | 2.98 |
| 1977 | 47.5 | 2.93 |
| 1976 | 46.2 | 2.85 |
| 1975 | 44.9 | 2.77 |
| 1974 | 43.7 | 2.69 |
| 1973 | 42.6 | 2.61 |
| 1972 | 41.5 | 2.53 |
| 1971 | 40.4 | 2.46 |
| 1970 | 39.4 | 2.38 |
| 1969 | 38.4 | 2.32 |
| 1968 | 37.5 | 2.25 |
| 1967 | 36.5 | 2.19 |
| 1966 | 35.6 | 2.13 |
| 1965 | 34.7 | 2.08 |
| 1964 | 33.8 | 2.03 |
| 1963 | 33 | 1.98 |
| 1962 | 32.2 | 1.94 |
| 1961 | 31.4 | 1.9 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/liberia/namibia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Liberia increased by 67.6%, compared to a 58.5% growth in Namibia.
In 2006, Liberia ranked 140th by population density and is 130th now. Namibia was 193rd in 2006 and ranks 195th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Liberia
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 157.4 ppl/mi² | 9.93 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 130/197 | 195/197 |
| Population |
5887000
|
3173089
|
| Land area | 37,189 sq mi | 317,874 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 184,716 sq ft | 2,924,567 sq ft |
| Rural population | 44.5% | 49.6% |
| Urban population | 55.5% | 50.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 17.4% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Liberia
|
Namibia
|
|
| 2024 | 55.5% | 50.4% |
| 2023 | 55% | 50% |
| 2022 | 54.5% | 49.5% |
| 2021 | 53.9% | 49.1% |
| 2020 | 53.4% | 48.5% |
| 2019 | 52.9% | 48% |
| 2018 | 52.3% | 47.4% |
| 2017 | 51.8% | 46.8% |
| 2016 | 51.3% | 46.2% |
| 2015 | 50.7% | 45.5% |
| 2014 | 50.2% | 44.8% |
| 2013 | 49.7% | 44.1% |
| 2012 | 49.2% | 43.4% |
| 2011 | 48.7% | 42.6% |
| 2010 | 48.1% | 41.8% |
| 2009 | 47.6% | 40.9% |
| 2008 | 47.1% | 39.8% |
| 2007 | 46.6% | 38.8% |
| 2006 | 46.2% | 37.7% |
| 2005 | 45.9% | 36.6% |
| 2004 | 45.4% | 35.5% |
| 2003 | 45% | 34.5% |
| 2002 | 44.6% | 33.6% |
| 2001 | 44.2% | 32.9% |
| 2000 | 43.8% | 32.1% |
| 1999 | 43.4% | 31.4% |
| 1998 | 43.2% | 30.6% |
| 1997 | 43% | 29.9% |
| 1996 | 43% | 29.3% |
| 1995 | 44.5% | 28.7% |
| 1994 | 48.3% | 28.1% |
| 1993 | 52.7% | 27.7% |
| 1992 | 56.4% | 27.3% |
| 1991 | 58% | 27.1% |
| 1990 | 43.3% | 26.9% |
| 1989 | 41.9% | 26.7% |
| 1988 | 41.3% | 26.5% |
| 1987 | 40.7% | 26.4% |
| 1986 | 36.7% | 26.2% |
| 1985 | 39.5% | 26.1% |
| 1984 | 39.1% | 26% |
| 1983 | 38.5% | 25.9% |
| 1982 | 37.7% | 25.8% |
| 1981 | 36.8% | 25.7% |
| 1980 | 35.8% | 25.6% |
| 1979 | 34.8% | 25.6% |
| 1978 | 33.7% | 25.5% |
| 1977 | 32.6% | 25.4% |
| 1976 | 31.5% | 25.4% |
| 1975 | 30.5% | 25.3% |
| 1974 | 29.5% | 25.2% |
| 1973 | 28.6% | 25.2% |
| 1972 | 27.8% | 25.1% |
| 1971 | 26.9% | 25% |
| 1970 | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| 1969 | 25.3% | 24.9% |
| 1968 | 24.5% | 24.7% |
| 1967 | 23.7% | 24.6% |
| 1966 | 22.9% | 24.5% |
| 1965 | 22.1% | 24.4% |
| 1964 | 21.4% | 24.2% |
| 1963 | 20.6% | 24% |
| 1962 | 19.9% | 23.8% |
| 1961 | 19.2% | 23.6% |
| 1960 | 18.6% | 23.4% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/liberia/namibia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 45.4% to 55.5% in Liberia and from 35.5% to 50.4% in Namibia.
Densely populated cities
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Windhoek | 431K |
| Walvis Bay | 103K |
| Swakopmund | 75.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/liberia/namibia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2020–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.