Namibia has a population density of 9.93 people per square mile compared to 767 people in Saint Lucia. Namibia has 2,932,826 sq ft of land per person vs 36,950 sq ft in Saint Lucia. Namibia and Saint Lucia rank 195th and 34th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Namibia has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.55% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.002% of the population and 0.0004% of the land area for Saint Lucia, making the population density in Namibia 98.7% lower than in Saint Lucia.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Namibia
|
Saint Lucia
|
|
| 2026 | 9.93 | 767 |
| 2025 | 9.74 | 765 |
| 2024 | 9.53 | 763 |
| 2023 | 9.32 | 761 |
| 2022 | 9.09 | 759 |
| 2021 | 8.84 | 758 |
| 2020 | 8.58 | 757 |
| 2019 | 8.34 | 754 |
| 2018 | 8.11 | 752 |
| 2017 | 7.89 | 749 |
| 2016 | 7.67 | 746 |
| 2015 | 7.47 | 743 |
| 2014 | 7.27 | 739 |
| 2013 | 7.09 | 736 |
| 2012 | 6.9 | 733 |
| 2011 | 6.75 | 729 |
| 2010 | 6.64 | 726 |
| 2009 | 6.54 | 721 |
| 2008 | 6.44 | 717 |
| 2007 | 6.35 | 712 |
| 2006 | 6.27 | 708 |
| 2005 | 6.19 | 702 |
| 2004 | 6.11 | 697 |
| 2003 | 6.03 | 692 |
| 2002 | 5.95 | 686 |
| 2001 | 5.84 | 680 |
| 2000 | 5.72 | 673 |
| 1999 | 5.59 | 665 |
| 1998 | 5.45 | 657 |
| 1997 | 5.31 | 648 |
| 1996 | 5.18 | 639 |
| 1995 | 5.04 | 629 |
| 1994 | 4.9 | 619 |
| 1993 | 4.75 | 610 |
| 1992 | 4.6 | 601 |
| 1991 | 4.45 | 592 |
| 1990 | 4.31 | 585 |
| 1989 | 4.05 | 580 |
| 1988 | 3.81 | 573 |
| 1987 | 3.67 | 566 |
| 1986 | 3.56 | 557 |
| 1985 | 3.45 | 548 |
| 1984 | 3.35 | 540 |
| 1983 | 3.26 | 531 |
| 1982 | 3.18 | 523 |
| 1981 | 3.12 | 514 |
| 1980 | 3.09 | 506 |
| 1979 | 3.03 | 499 |
| 1978 | 2.98 | 492 |
| 1977 | 2.93 | 485 |
| 1976 | 2.85 | 477 |
| 1975 | 2.77 | 470 |
| 1974 | 2.69 | 463 |
| 1973 | 2.61 | 456 |
| 1972 | 2.53 | 450 |
| 1971 | 2.46 | 444 |
| 1970 | 2.38 | 438 |
| 1969 | 2.32 | 433 |
| 1968 | 2.25 | 427 |
| 1967 | 2.19 | 422 |
| 1966 | 2.13 | 418 |
| 1965 | 2.08 | 414 |
| 1964 | 2.03 | 410 |
| 1963 | 1.98 | 406 |
| 1962 | 1.94 | 401 |
| 1961 | 1.9 | 397 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/namibia/saint-lucia | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Namibia increased by 58.5%, compared to a 8.35% growth in Saint Lucia.
In 2006, Namibia ranked 193rd by population density and is 195th now. Saint Lucia was 32nd in 2006 and ranks 34th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Namibia
|
Saint Lucia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 9.93 ppl/mi² | 767 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 195/197 | 34/197 |
| Population |
3173089
|
180638
|
| Land area | 317,874 sq mi | 235.5 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,924,567 sq ft | 36,530 sq ft |
| Rural population | 49.6% | 70.9% |
| Urban population | 50.4% | 29.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Namibia
|
Saint Lucia
|
|
| 2024 | 50.4% | 29.1% |
| 2023 | 50% | 29.1% |
| 2022 | 49.5% | 29.1% |
| 2021 | 49.1% | 27.4% |
| 2020 | 48.5% | 25.8% |
| 2019 | 48% | 24.2% |
| 2018 | 47.4% | 22.9% |
| 2017 | 46.8% | 21.8% |
| 2016 | 46.2% | 20.8% |
| 2015 | 45.5% | 20% |
| 2014 | 44.8% | 19.4% |
| 2013 | 44.1% | 18.9% |
| 2012 | 43.4% | 18.6% |
| 2011 | 42.6% | 18.5% |
| 2010 | 41.8% | 18.5% |
| 2009 | 40.9% | 19% |
| 2008 | 39.8% | 19.8% |
| 2007 | 38.8% | 20.9% |
| 2006 | 37.7% | 22.2% |
| 2005 | 36.6% | 23.5% |
| 2004 | 35.5% | 24.8% |
| 2003 | 34.5% | 26% |
| 2002 | 33.6% | 26.9% |
| 2001 | 32.9% | 27.5% |
| 2000 | 32.1% | 27.9% |
| 1999 | 31.4% | 28.2% |
| 1998 | 30.6% | 28.5% |
| 1997 | 29.9% | 28.7% |
| 1996 | 29.3% | 29% |
| 1995 | 28.7% | 29.2% |
| 1994 | 28.1% | 29.3% |
| 1993 | 27.7% | 29.5% |
| 1992 | 27.3% | 29.5% |
| 1991 | 27.1% | 29.6% |
| 1990 | 26.9% | 29.5% |
| 1989 | 26.7% | 29.4% |
| 1988 | 26.5% | 29.2% |
| 1987 | 26.4% | 29% |
| 1986 | 26.2% | 28.6% |
| 1985 | 26.1% | 28.3% |
| 1984 | 26% | 27.9% |
| 1983 | 25.9% | 27.5% |
| 1982 | 25.8% | 27.1% |
| 1981 | 25.7% | 26.7% |
| 1980 | 25.6% | 26.4% |
| 1979 | 25.6% | 26% |
| 1978 | 25.5% | 25.6% |
| 1977 | 25.4% | 25.1% |
| 1976 | 25.4% | 24.6% |
| 1975 | 25.3% | 24.1% |
| 1974 | 25.2% | 23.7% |
| 1973 | 25.2% | 23.2% |
| 1972 | 25.1% | 22.8% |
| 1971 | 25% | 22.4% |
| 1970 | 24.9% | 22.1% |
| 1969 | 24.9% | 21.8% |
| 1968 | 24.7% | 21.6% |
| 1967 | 24.6% | 21.4% |
| 1966 | 24.5% | 21.2% |
| 1965 | 24.4% | 21.1% |
| 1964 | 24.2% | 20.9% |
| 1963 | 24% | 20.7% |
| 1962 | 23.8% | 20.6% |
| 1961 | 23.6% | 20.4% |
| 1960 | 23.4% | 20.3% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/namibia/saint-lucia | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 35.5% to 50.4% in Namibia and from 24.8% to 29.1% in Saint Lucia.
Densely populated cities
|
Namibia
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Windhoek | 431K |
| Walvis Bay | 103K |
| Swakopmund | 75.9K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/namibia/saint-lucia | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2020–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.