Samoa has a population density of 203.1 people per square mile compared to 1,373 people in South Korea. Samoa has 140,314 sq ft of land per person vs 20,861 sq ft in South Korea. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Samoa and South Korea are ranked 109th and 18th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Samoa has 0.003% of the world's population and 0.002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.64% of the population and 0.07% of the land area for South Korea, hence the population density in Samoa is 85.2% lower than in South Korea.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 203.1 ppl/mi² | 1,373 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 109/197 | 18/197 |
| Population |
220288
|
51700480
|
| Land area | 1,073 sq mi | 37,684 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,253 sq ft | 20,300 sq ft |
| Rural population | 82.6% | 18.5% |
| Urban population | 17.4% | 81.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 52% |
Samoa vs South Korea:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Samoa increased by 19.2%, compared to a 6.77% growth in South Korea.
In 2004, Samoa ranked 104th for population density and is in 109th place now. South Korea was 13th in 2004 and ranks 18th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 203.1 | 1,373 |
| 2023 | 201.9 | 1,372 |
| 2022 | 200.5 | 1,371 |
| 2021 | 199.2 | 1,374 |
| 2020 | 197.5 | 1,376 |
| 2019 | 195.4 | 1,374 |
| 2018 | 193.4 | 1,370 |
| 2017 | 191.4 | 1,364 |
| 2016 | 186.2 | 1,361 |
| 2015 | 184.7 | 1,356 |
| 2014 | 183.1 | 1,349 |
| 2013 | 181.5 | 1,341 |
| 2012 | 179.8 | 1,336 |
| 2011 | 178.2 | 1,331 |
| 2010 | 176.7 | 1,320 |
| 2009 | 175.3 | 1,316 |
| 2008 | 174 | 1,310 |
| 2007 | 172.7 | 1,301 |
| 2006 | 171.8 | 1,295 |
| 2005 | 171.1 | 1,289 |
| 2004 | 170.5 | 1,286 |
| 2003 | 169.7 | 1,281 |
| 2002 | 168.8 | 1,275 |
| 2001 | 167.6 | 1,268 |
| 2000 | 166.3 | 1,262 |
| 1999 | 165 | 1,252 |
| 1998 | 163.7 | 1,243 |
| 1997 | 162.5 | 1,234 |
| 1996 | 161.1 | 1,222 |
| 1995 | 159.8 | 1,211 |
| 1994 | 158.5 | 1,199 |
| 1993 | 157.2 | 1,187 |
| 1992 | 155.9 | 1,175 |
| 1991 | 155 | 1,163 |
| 1990 | 154.7 | 1,151 |
| 1989 | 154.5 | 1,140 |
| 1988 | 154.1 | 1,129 |
| 1987 | 153.4 | 1,118 |
| 1986 | 152.9 | 1,107 |
| 1985 | 152.7 | 1,096 |
| 1984 | 152.7 | 1,085 |
| 1983 | 152.6 | 1,072 |
| 1982 | 152.4 | 1,056 |
| 1981 | 151.6 | 1,040 |
| 1980 | 150.4 | 1,024 |
| 1979 | 149.1 | 1,008 |
| 1978 | 147.7 | 993 |
| 1977 | 146.2 | 978 |
| 1976 | 143.8 | 963 |
| 1975 | 140.3 | 947 |
| 1974 | 136.8 | 932 |
| 1973 | 134.1 | 916 |
| 1972 | 132.3 | 900 |
| 1971 | 130.4 | 883 |
| 1970 | 128.5 | 866 |
| 1969 | 126.5 | 847 |
| 1968 | 124.5 | 828 |
| 1967 | 122.4 | 809 |
| 1966 | 120 | 790 |
| 1965 | 117.1 | 771 |
| 1964 | 114.3 | 751 |
| 1963 | 111.4 | 732 |
| 1962 | 108.5 | 712 |
| 1961 | 105.7 | 692 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 17.4% | 81.5% |
| 2023 | 17.5% | 81.5% |
| 2022 | 17.6% | 81.4% |
| 2021 | 17.7% | 81.4% |
| 2020 | 17.9% | 81.4% |
| 2019 | 18.1% | 81.4% |
| 2018 | 18.2% | 81.5% |
| 2017 | 18.5% | 81.5% |
| 2016 | 18.7% | 81.6% |
| 2015 | 18.9% | 81.6% |
| 2014 | 19.1% | 81.7% |
| 2013 | 19.4% | 81.8% |
| 2012 | 19.6% | 81.9% |
| 2011 | 19.9% | 81.9% |
| 2010 | 20.1% | 81.9% |
| 2009 | 20.3% | 81.8% |
| 2008 | 20.5% | 81.7% |
| 2007 | 20.7% | 81.6% |
| 2006 | 21% | 81.5% |
| 2005 | 21.2% | 81.3% |
| 2004 | 21.5% | 81% |
| 2003 | 21.7% | 80.7% |
| 2002 | 21.9% | 80.3% |
| 2001 | 22.1% | 79.9% |
| 2000 | 22% | 79.6% |
| 1999 | 21.9% | 79.4% |
| 1998 | 21.8% | 79.1% |
| 1997 | 21.7% | 78.9% |
| 1996 | 21.6% | 78.7% |
| 1995 | 21.5% | 78.2% |
| 1994 | 21.4% | 77.5% |
| 1993 | 21.3% | 76.6% |
| 1992 | 21.3% | 75.8% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 75% |
| 1990 | 21.2% | 73.8% |
| 1989 | 21.2% | 72.1% |
| 1988 | 21.2% | 70.4% |
| 1987 | 21.2% | 68.6% |
| 1986 | 21.2% | 66.7% |
| 1985 | 21.2% | 64.9% |
| 1984 | 21.2% | 63.3% |
| 1983 | 21.2% | 61.7% |
| 1982 | 21.2% | 60.1% |
| 1981 | 21.2% | 58.4% |
| 1980 | 21.2% | 56.7% |
| 1979 | 21.2% | 55% |
| 1978 | 21.1% | 53.2% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 51.5% |
| 1976 | 21.1% | 49.7% |
| 1975 | 21% | 48% |
| 1974 | 20.9% | 46.6% |
| 1973 | 20.8% | 45.1% |
| 1972 | 20.8% | 43.7% |
| 1971 | 20.6% | 42.3% |
| 1970 | 20.4% | 40.7% |
| 1969 | 20.1% | 38.8% |
| 1968 | 19.8% | 36.8% |
| 1967 | 19.6% | 35% |
| 1966 | 19.4% | 33.3% |
| 1965 | 19.3% | 32.4% |
| 1964 | 19.2% | 31.4% |
| 1963 | 19.1% | 30.4% |
| 1962 | 19.1% | 29.5% |
| 1961 | 19% | 28.5% |
| 1960 | 18.9% | 27.7% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa and from 81% to 81.5% in South Korea.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons