Barbados has a population density of 1,703 people per square mile compared to 205.5 people in Samoa. Barbados has 16,729 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. Barbados and Samoa rank 9th and 112th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Barbados has 0.003% of the world's population and 0.0003% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, making the population density in Barbados 729% higher than in Samoa.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Barbados
|
Samoa
|
|
| 2026 | 1,703 | 205.5 |
| 2025 | 1,702 | 204.4 |
| 2024 | 1,701 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 1,701 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 1,700 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 1,699 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 1,697 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 1,694 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 1,691 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 1,688 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 1,684 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 1,680 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 1,677 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 1,672 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 1,668 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 1,663 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 1,658 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 1,651 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 1,643 | 174 |
| 2007 | 1,634 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 1,626 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 1,618 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 1,610 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 1,601 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 1,591 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 1,581 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 1,578 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 1,581 | 165 |
| 1998 | 1,581 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 1,580 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 1,580 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 1,578 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 1,576 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 1,572 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 1,568 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 1,562 | 155 |
| 1990 | 1,557 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 1,555 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 1,553 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 1,550 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 1,546 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 1,541 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 1,535 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 1,530 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 1,524 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 1,519 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 1,515 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 1,513 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 1,515 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 1,516 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 1,514 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 1,513 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 1,510 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 1,508 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 1,504 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 1,501 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 1,502 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 1,502 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 1,497 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 1,488 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 1,476 | 120 |
| 1965 | 1,460 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 1,445 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 1,431 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 1,417 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 1,404 | 105.7 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/barbados/samoa | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Barbados increased by 4.73%, compared to a 19.6% growth in Samoa.
In 2006, Barbados ranked 9th by population density and is 9th still. Samoa was 108th in 2006 and ranks 112th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Barbados
|
Samoa
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 1,703 ppl/mi² | 205.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 9/197 | 112/197 |
| Population |
282798
|
220932
|
| Land area | 166 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 16,386 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 40.5% | 82.5% |
| Urban population | 59.5% | 17.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Barbados
|
Samoa
|
|
| 2024 | 59.5% | 17.5% |
| 2023 | 59.4% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 59.4% | 17.5% |
| 2021 | 59.3% | 17.6% |
| 2020 | 59.3% | 18.1% |
| 2019 | 59.3% | 18.4% |
| 2018 | 59.3% | 18.7% |
| 2017 | 59.3% | 19% |
| 2016 | 59.3% | 19.1% |
| 2015 | 59.2% | 19.2% |
| 2014 | 59.2% | 19.3% |
| 2013 | 59.2% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 59.2% | 19.5% |
| 2011 | 59.2% | 19.6% |
| 2010 | 59.2% | 19.8% |
| 2009 | 59.3% | 20.1% |
| 2008 | 59.5% | 20.4% |
| 2007 | 59.8% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 60.2% | 21% |
| 2005 | 60.6% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 61.1% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 61.6% | 21.8% |
| 2002 | 62% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 62.3% | 22% |
| 2000 | 62.5% | 22% |
| 1999 | 62.7% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 62.8% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 63% | 21.8% |
| 1996 | 63.1% | 21.7% |
| 1995 | 63.2% | 21.6% |
| 1994 | 63.3% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 63.4% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 63.5% | 21.2% |
| 1991 | 63.5% | 21.1% |
| 1990 | 63.6% | 21% |
| 1989 | 63.6% | 20.8% |
| 1988 | 63.6% | 20.6% |
| 1987 | 63.6% | 20.5% |
| 1986 | 63.5% | 20.5% |
| 1985 | 63.5% | 20.6% |
| 1984 | 63.5% | 20.8% |
| 1983 | 63.5% | 21% |
| 1982 | 63.5% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 63.5% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 63.5% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 63.1% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 62% | 21.2% |
| 1977 | 60.3% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 58.1% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 55.7% | 21% |
| 1974 | 53.1% | 21% |
| 1973 | 50.6% | 20.9% |
| 1972 | 48.4% | 20.7% |
| 1971 | 46.6% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 45.3% | 20.3% |
| 1969 | 44.5% | 20% |
| 1968 | 43.8% | 19.7% |
| 1967 | 43.2% | 19.5% |
| 1966 | 42.6% | 19.3% |
| 1965 | 42.1% | 19.2% |
| 1964 | 41.6% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 41.2% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 40.9% | 19% |
| 1961 | 40.6% | 18.9% |
| 1960 | 40.4% | 18.9% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/barbados/samoa | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 61.1% to 59.5% in Barbados and from 21.5% to 17.5% in Samoa.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/barbados/samoa | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.