Mozambique has a population density of 114.1 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Mozambique has 249,142 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mozambique and Samoa are ranked 144th and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mozambique has 0.43% of the world's population and 0.53% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Mozambique is 43.8% lower than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 114.1 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 144/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
36441519
|
220288
|
| Land area | 303,623 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 244,415 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 60.7% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 39.3% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.25% | 0% |
Mozambique vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mozambique increased by 74.6%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Mozambique ranked 148th for population density and is in 144th place now. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 114.1 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 110.8 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 107.6 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 104.4 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 101.4 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 98.4 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 95.6 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 92.8 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 90 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 87.4 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 84.9 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 82.5 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 80.2 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 77.9 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 75.7 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 73.7 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 71.9 | 174 |
| 2007 | 70.1 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 68.5 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 66.9 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 65.3 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 63.9 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 62.4 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 61.1 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 59.7 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 58.4 | 165 |
| 1998 | 57.1 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 55.8 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 54.3 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 52.6 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 49.5 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 46.3 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 44.8 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 44 | 155 |
| 1990 | 43.1 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 42.5 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 42.2 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 42.2 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 42.1 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 41.3 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 40.6 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 39.8 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 38.9 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 38.1 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 37.3 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 36.3 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 35 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 33.7 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 32.5 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 31.4 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 30.4 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 29.5 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 28.6 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 27.9 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 27.2 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 26.6 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 26 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 25.4 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 24.9 | 120 |
| 1965 | 24.4 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 23.9 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 23.4 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 23 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 22.5 | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 39.3% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 38.8% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 38.2% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 37.6% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 37.1% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 36.5% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 36% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 35.5% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 34.9% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 34.4% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 33.9% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 33.4% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 32.8% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 32.3% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 31.8% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 31.3% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 30.8% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 30.4% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 30.2% | 21% |
| 2005 | 30% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 29.6% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 29.5% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 29.3% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 29.1% | 22% |
| 1999 | 28.9% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 28.7% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 28.5% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 28% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 27.5% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 27% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 26.5% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 26% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 25.5% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 25% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 23.5% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 22.2% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 20.8% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 19.5% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 17.2% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 16.1% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 15% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 14.1% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 13.2% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 12.7% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 12.2% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 11.7% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 11.3% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 10.9% | 21% |
| 1974 | 10.5% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 10.1% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 9.67% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 9.3% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 8.99% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 8.75% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 8.52% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 8.3% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 8.07% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 7.86% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 7.65% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 7.45% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 7.25% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 7.05% | 19% |
| 1960 | 6.87% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 39.3% in Mozambique and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons