Samoa has a population density of 203.1 people per square mile compared to 273.5 people in Slovenia. Samoa has 140,314 sq ft of land per person vs 102,616 sq ft in Slovenia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Samoa and Slovenia are ranked 109th and 89th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Samoa has 0.003% of the world's population and 0.002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for Slovenia, hence the population density in Samoa is 25.7% lower than in Slovenia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 203.1 ppl/mi² | 273.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 109/197 | 89/197 |
| Population |
220288
|
2124696
|
| Land area | 1,073 sq mi | 7,774 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,253 sq ft | 101,925 sq ft |
| Rural population | 82.6% | 43.6% |
| Urban population | 17.4% | 56.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Samoa vs Slovenia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Samoa increased by 19.2%, compared to a 6.5% growth in Slovenia.
In 2004, Samoa ranked 104th for population density and is in 109th place now. Slovenia was 78th in 2004 and ranks 89th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 203.1 | 273.5 |
| 2023 | 201.9 | 272.8 |
| 2022 | 200.5 | 271.7 |
| 2021 | 199.2 | 271.1 |
| 2020 | 197.5 | 270.4 |
| 2019 | 195.4 | 268.6 |
| 2018 | 193.4 | 266.7 |
| 2017 | 191.4 | 265.8 |
| 2016 | 186.2 | 265.5 |
| 2015 | 184.7 | 265.3 |
| 2014 | 183.1 | 265.2 |
| 2013 | 181.5 | 264.9 |
| 2012 | 179.8 | 264.5 |
| 2011 | 178.2 | 263.9 |
| 2010 | 176.7 | 263.4 |
| 2009 | 175.3 | 262.2 |
| 2008 | 174 | 259.9 |
| 2007 | 172.7 | 259.5 |
| 2006 | 171.8 | 258.1 |
| 2005 | 171.1 | 257.3 |
| 2004 | 170.5 | 256.8 |
| 2003 | 169.7 | 256.6 |
| 2002 | 168.8 | 256.5 |
| 2001 | 167.6 | 256.2 |
| 2000 | 166.3 | 255.8 |
| 1999 | 165 | 255 |
| 1998 | 163.7 | 254.8 |
| 1997 | 162.5 | 255.4 |
| 1996 | 161.1 | 255.7 |
| 1995 | 159.8 | 255.9 |
| 1994 | 158.5 | 255.8 |
| 1993 | 157.2 | 256.1 |
| 1992 | 155.9 | 256.7 |
| 1991 | 155 | - |
| 1990 | 154.7 | - |
| 1989 | 154.5 | - |
| 1988 | 154.1 | - |
| 1987 | 153.4 | - |
| 1986 | 152.9 | - |
| 1985 | 152.7 | - |
| 1984 | 152.7 | - |
| 1983 | 152.6 | - |
| 1982 | 152.4 | - |
| 1981 | 151.6 | - |
| 1980 | 150.4 | - |
| 1979 | 149.1 | - |
| 1978 | 147.7 | - |
| 1977 | 146.2 | - |
| 1976 | 143.8 | - |
| 1975 | 140.3 | - |
| 1974 | 136.8 | - |
| 1973 | 134.1 | - |
| 1972 | 132.3 | - |
| 1971 | 130.4 | - |
| 1970 | 128.5 | - |
| 1969 | 126.5 | - |
| 1968 | 124.5 | - |
| 1967 | 122.4 | - |
| 1966 | 120 | - |
| 1965 | 117.1 | - |
| 1964 | 114.3 | - |
| 1963 | 111.4 | - |
| 1962 | 108.5 | - |
| 1961 | 105.7 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 17.4% | 56.4% |
| 2023 | 17.5% | 56.1% |
| 2022 | 17.6% | 55.8% |
| 2021 | 17.7% | 55.4% |
| 2020 | 17.9% | 55.1% |
| 2019 | 18.1% | 54.8% |
| 2018 | 18.2% | 54.5% |
| 2017 | 18.5% | 54.3% |
| 2016 | 18.7% | 54% |
| 2015 | 18.9% | 53.8% |
| 2014 | 19.1% | 53.6% |
| 2013 | 19.4% | 53.3% |
| 2012 | 19.6% | 53.1% |
| 2011 | 19.9% | 52.9% |
| 2010 | 20.1% | 52.7% |
| 2009 | 20.3% | 52.4% |
| 2008 | 20.5% | 52.2% |
| 2007 | 20.7% | 52% |
| 2006 | 21% | 51.8% |
| 2005 | 21.2% | 51.5% |
| 2004 | 21.5% | 51.3% |
| 2003 | 21.7% | 51.1% |
| 2002 | 21.9% | 50.9% |
| 2001 | 22.1% | 50.8% |
| 2000 | 22% | 50.8% |
| 1999 | 21.9% | 50.7% |
| 1998 | 21.8% | 50.7% |
| 1997 | 21.7% | 50.7% |
| 1996 | 21.6% | 50.6% |
| 1995 | 21.5% | 50.6% |
| 1994 | 21.4% | 50.6% |
| 1993 | 21.3% | 50.6% |
| 1992 | 21.3% | 50.5% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 50.5% |
| 1990 | 21.2% | 50.4% |
| 1989 | 21.2% | 50.2% |
| 1988 | 21.2% | 50.1% |
| 1987 | 21.2% | 49.9% |
| 1986 | 21.2% | 49.7% |
| 1985 | 21.2% | 49.6% |
| 1984 | 21.2% | 49.4% |
| 1983 | 21.2% | 49.3% |
| 1982 | 21.2% | 49.1% |
| 1981 | 21.2% | 48.9% |
| 1980 | 21.2% | 48% |
| 1979 | 21.2% | 46.9% |
| 1978 | 21.1% | 45.8% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 44.6% |
| 1976 | 21.1% | 43.5% |
| 1975 | 21% | 42.4% |
| 1974 | 20.9% | 41.3% |
| 1973 | 20.8% | 40.2% |
| 1972 | 20.8% | 39.1% |
| 1971 | 20.6% | 38% |
| 1970 | 20.4% | 37% |
| 1969 | 20.1% | 36.1% |
| 1968 | 19.8% | 35.2% |
| 1967 | 19.6% | 34.3% |
| 1966 | 19.4% | 33.4% |
| 1965 | 19.3% | 32.5% |
| 1964 | 19.2% | 31.6% |
| 1963 | 19.1% | 30.8% |
| 1962 | 19.1% | 29.9% |
| 1961 | 19% | 29.1% |
| 1960 | 18.9% | 28.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa and from 51.3% to 56.4% in Slovenia.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons