Mauritania has a population density of 13 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Mauritania has 2,146,163 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mauritania and Samoa are ranked 188th and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mauritania has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.69% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Mauritania is 93.6% lower than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 13 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 188/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
5432542
|
220288
|
| Land area | 397,955 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,146,163 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.5% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 58.5% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 20.8% | 0% |
Mauritania vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mauritania increased by 80.2%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Mauritania ranked 189th for population density and is in 188th place now. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 13 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 12.6 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 12.3 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 11.9 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 11.6 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 11.2 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 10.9 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 10.6 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 10.3 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 9.97 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 9.67 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 9.38 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 9.09 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 8.8 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 8.52 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 8.25 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 8 | 174 |
| 2007 | 7.77 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 7.57 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 7.39 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 7.21 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 7.04 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 6.88 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 6.73 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 6.57 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 6.39 | 165 |
| 1998 | 6.22 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 6.06 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 5.93 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 5.81 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 5.65 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 5.46 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 5.25 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 5.05 | 155 |
| 1990 | 4.9 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 4.78 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 4.66 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 4.53 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 4.4 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 4.28 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 4.16 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 4.04 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 3.92 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 3.81 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 3.7 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 3.6 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 3.5 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 3.4 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 3.31 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 3.21 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 3.12 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 3.03 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 2.94 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 2.85 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 2.76 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 2.68 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 2.6 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 2.52 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 2.45 | 120 |
| 1965 | 2.38 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 2.31 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 2.25 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 2.18 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 2.13 | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 58.5% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 57.7% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 56.1% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 55.3% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 54.5% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 53.7% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 52.8% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 52% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 51.1% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 50.2% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 48.4% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 47.5% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 46.6% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 45.7% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 44.8% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 43.9% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 43% | 21% |
| 2005 | 42.1% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 41.2% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 40.4% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 39.5% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 38.6% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 38.1% | 22% |
| 1999 | 38.2% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 38.3% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 38.5% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 38.6% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 38.7% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 38.8% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 39% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 39.1% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 39.2% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 39.3% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 39.4% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 39.6% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 38.3% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 36.6% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 35% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 33.4% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 31.8% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 30.3% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 28.8% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 27.4% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 26% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 24.6% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 23.3% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 22% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 20.6% | 21% |
| 1974 | 19.2% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 18% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 16.8% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 15.6% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 14.6% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 13.6% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 12.6% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 11.7% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 10.9% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 10.1% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 9.36% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 8.67% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 8.03% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 7.44% | 19% |
| 1960 | 6.88% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 41.2% to 58.5% in Mauritania and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons