Malta has a population density of 4,649 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Malta has 5,922 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Malta and Samoa are ranked 5th and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malta has 0.007% of the world's population and 0.0002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Malta is 2,189% higher than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 4,649 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 5/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
583596
|
220288
|
| Land area | 123.6 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 5,997 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 4.99% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 95% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Malta vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Malta increased by 43.1%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Malta ranked 4th for population density and is in 5th place now. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 4,649 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 4,474 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 4,299 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 4,194 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 4,172 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 4,079 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 3,917 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 3,781 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 3,679 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 3,595 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 3,508 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 3,438 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 3,400 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 3,369 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 3,355 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 3,338 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 3,313 | 174 |
| 2007 | 3,292 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 3,280 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 3,269 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 3,248 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 3,226 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 3,205 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 3,181 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 3,157 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 3,137 | 165 |
| 1998 | 3,118 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 3,098 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 3,075 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 3,055 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 3,033 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 3,005 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 2,975 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 2,945 | 155 |
| 1990 | 2,867 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 2,839 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 2,811 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 2,788 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 2,769 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 2,723 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 2,676 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 2,675 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 2,638 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 2,582 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 2,563 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 2,536 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 2,511 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 2,485 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 2,475 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 2,462 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 2,444 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 2,446 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 2,448 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 2,450 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 2,450 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 2,463 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 2,492 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 2,522 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 2,551 | 120 |
| 1965 | 2,580 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 2,600 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 2,611 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 2,622 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 2,632 | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 95% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 94.9% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 94.9% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 94.8% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 94.7% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 94.7% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 94.6% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 94.5% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 94.5% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 94.4% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 94.3% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 94.3% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 94.2% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 94.1% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 94.1% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 94% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 93.9% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 93.9% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 93.8% | 21% |
| 2005 | 93.6% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 93.4% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 93.2% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 92.9% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 92.6% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 22% |
| 1999 | 92.1% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 91.8% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 91.5% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 91.2% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 90.9% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 90.8% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 90.7% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 90.6% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 90.5% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 90.4% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 90.3% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 90.1% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 90% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 89.9% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 89.8% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 89.8% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 89.8% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 89.8% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 89.7% | 21% |
| 1974 | 89.7% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 89.7% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 89.7% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 89.7% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 89.7% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 89.7% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 89.7% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 89.7% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 89.8% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 89.8% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 89.9% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 89.9% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 90% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 90.1% | 19% |
| 1960 | 90.1% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 93.4% to 95% in Malta and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons