Samoa has a population density of 203.1 people per square mile compared to 691 people in Trinidad and Tobago. Samoa has 140,314 sq ft of land per person vs 40,339 sq ft in Trinidad and Tobago. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Samoa and Trinidad and Tobago are ranked 109th and 38th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Samoa has 0.003% of the world's population and 0.002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.003% of the land area for Trinidad and Tobago, hence the population density in Samoa is 70.6% lower than in Trinidad and Tobago.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 203.1 ppl/mi² | 691 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 109/197 | 38/197 |
| Population |
220288
|
1372940
|
| Land area | 1,073 sq mi | 1,981 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,253 sq ft | 40,355 sq ft |
| Rural population | 82.6% | 46.4% |
| Urban population | 17.4% | 53.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Samoa vs Trinidad and Tobago:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Samoa increased by 19.2%, compared to a 1.71% growth in Trinidad and Tobago.
In 2004, Samoa ranked 104th for population density and is in 109th place now. Trinidad and Tobago was 33rd in 2004 and ranks 38th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 203.1 | 691 |
| 2023 | 201.9 | 690 |
| 2022 | 200.5 | 690 |
| 2021 | 199.2 | 690 |
| 2020 | 197.5 | 690 |
| 2019 | 195.4 | 689 |
| 2018 | 193.4 | 686 |
| 2017 | 191.4 | 685 |
| 2016 | 186.2 | 684 |
| 2015 | 184.7 | 681 |
| 2014 | 183.1 | 679 |
| 2013 | 181.5 | 677 |
| 2012 | 179.8 | 674 |
| 2011 | 178.2 | 670 |
| 2010 | 176.7 | 665 |
| 2009 | 175.3 | 661 |
| 2008 | 174 | 661 |
| 2007 | 172.7 | 658 |
| 2006 | 171.8 | 655 |
| 2005 | 171.1 | 654 |
| 2004 | 170.5 | 679 |
| 2003 | 169.7 | 676 |
| 2002 | 168.8 | 672 |
| 2001 | 167.6 | 669 |
| 2000 | 166.3 | 666 |
| 1999 | 165 | 664 |
| 1998 | 163.7 | 661 |
| 1997 | 162.5 | 659 |
| 1996 | 161.1 | 657 |
| 1995 | 159.8 | 654 |
| 1994 | 158.5 | 650 |
| 1993 | 157.2 | 646 |
| 1992 | 155.9 | 642 |
| 1991 | 155 | 637 |
| 1990 | 154.7 | 632 |
| 1989 | 154.5 | 627 |
| 1988 | 154.1 | 621 |
| 1987 | 153.4 | 615 |
| 1986 | 152.9 | 607 |
| 1985 | 152.7 | 599 |
| 1984 | 152.7 | 592 |
| 1983 | 152.6 | 586 |
| 1982 | 152.4 | 580 |
| 1981 | 151.6 | 573 |
| 1980 | 150.4 | 566 |
| 1979 | 149.1 | 559 |
| 1978 | 147.7 | 552 |
| 1977 | 146.2 | 545 |
| 1976 | 143.8 | 538 |
| 1975 | 140.3 | 532 |
| 1974 | 136.8 | 525 |
| 1973 | 134.1 | 519 |
| 1972 | 132.3 | 512 |
| 1971 | 130.4 | 506 |
| 1970 | 128.5 | 501 |
| 1969 | 126.5 | 495 |
| 1968 | 124.5 | 489 |
| 1967 | 122.4 | 483 |
| 1966 | 120 | 476 |
| 1965 | 117.1 | 469 |
| 1964 | 114.3 | 461 |
| 1963 | 111.4 | 453 |
| 1962 | 108.5 | 444 |
| 1961 | 105.7 | 436 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 17.4% | 53.6% |
| 2023 | 17.5% | 53.4% |
| 2022 | 17.6% | 53.3% |
| 2021 | 17.7% | 53.3% |
| 2020 | 17.9% | 53.2% |
| 2019 | 18.1% | 53.2% |
| 2018 | 18.2% | 53.2% |
| 2017 | 18.5% | 53.2% |
| 2016 | 18.7% | 53.2% |
| 2015 | 18.9% | 53.3% |
| 2014 | 19.1% | 53.4% |
| 2013 | 19.4% | 53.5% |
| 2012 | 19.6% | 53.7% |
| 2011 | 19.9% | 53.8% |
| 2010 | 20.1% | 54% |
| 2009 | 20.3% | 54.2% |
| 2008 | 20.5% | 54.4% |
| 2007 | 20.7% | 54.6% |
| 2006 | 21% | 54.8% |
| 2005 | 21.2% | 55% |
| 2004 | 21.5% | 55.2% |
| 2003 | 21.7% | 55.3% |
| 2002 | 21.9% | 55.5% |
| 2001 | 22.1% | 55.7% |
| 2000 | 22% | 55.9% |
| 1999 | 21.9% | 55.8% |
| 1998 | 21.8% | 55.6% |
| 1997 | 21.7% | 55.4% |
| 1996 | 21.6% | 55.2% |
| 1995 | 21.5% | 55% |
| 1994 | 21.4% | 54.9% |
| 1993 | 21.3% | 54.7% |
| 1992 | 21.3% | 54.5% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 54.3% |
| 1990 | 21.2% | 54.1% |
| 1989 | 21.2% | 53.9% |
| 1988 | 21.2% | 53.8% |
| 1987 | 21.2% | 53.6% |
| 1986 | 21.2% | 53.4% |
| 1985 | 21.2% | 53.2% |
| 1984 | 21.2% | 53% |
| 1983 | 21.2% | 52.8% |
| 1982 | 21.2% | 52.7% |
| 1981 | 21.2% | 52.5% |
| 1980 | 21.2% | 52.3% |
| 1979 | 21.2% | 51.4% |
| 1978 | 21.1% | 50.5% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 49.6% |
| 1976 | 21.1% | 48.6% |
| 1975 | 21% | 47.7% |
| 1974 | 20.9% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 20.8% | 45.8% |
| 1972 | 20.8% | 44.9% |
| 1971 | 20.6% | 44% |
| 1970 | 20.4% | 43% |
| 1969 | 20.1% | 42.1% |
| 1968 | 19.8% | 41.2% |
| 1967 | 19.6% | 40.3% |
| 1966 | 19.4% | 39.4% |
| 1965 | 19.3% | 38.5% |
| 1964 | 19.2% | 37.6% |
| 1963 | 19.1% | 36.7% |
| 1962 | 19.1% | 35.9% |
| 1961 | 19% | 35% |
| 1960 | 18.9% | 34.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa and from 55.2% to 53.6% in Trinidad and Tobago.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Port of Spain | 84.1K |
| Chaguanas | 83.5K |
| San Fernando | 55.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons