Chile has a population density of 68.9 people per square mile compared to 203.1 people in Samoa. Chile has 411,774 sq ft of land per person vs 140,314 sq ft in Samoa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Chile and Samoa are ranked 162nd and 109th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Chile has 0.24% of the world's population and 0.5% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.003% of the population and 0.002% of the land area for Samoa, hence the population density in Chile is 66.1% lower than in Samoa.
Population density comparison
Chile
|
Samoa
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 68.9 ppl/mi² | 203.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 162/197 | 109/197 |
| Population |
19928941
|
220288
|
| Land area | 286,809 sq mi | 1,073 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 404,547 sq ft | 137,253 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11.9% | 82.6% |
| Urban population | 88.1% | 17.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 31.7% | 0% |
Chile vs Samoa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Chile increased by 22.2%, compared to a 19.2% growth in Samoa.
In 2004, Chile ranked 153rd for population density and is in 162nd place now. Samoa was 104th in 2004 and ranks 109th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Samoa
|
|
| 2024 | 68.9 | 203.1 |
| 2023 | 68.5 | 201.9 |
| 2022 | 68.2 | 200.5 |
| 2021 | 67.8 | 199.2 |
| 2020 | 67.5 | 197.5 |
| 2019 | 66.9 | 195.4 |
| 2018 | 65.9 | 193.4 |
| 2017 | 64.8 | 191.4 |
| 2016 | 63.7 | 186.2 |
| 2015 | 63 | 184.7 |
| 2014 | 62.4 | 183.1 |
| 2013 | 61.6 | 181.5 |
| 2012 | 61 | 179.8 |
| 2011 | 60.4 | 178.2 |
| 2010 | 59.8 | 176.7 |
| 2009 | 59.3 | 175.3 |
| 2008 | 58.7 | 174 |
| 2007 | 58.1 | 172.7 |
| 2006 | 57.5 | 171.8 |
| 2005 | 56.9 | 171.1 |
| 2004 | 56.4 | 170.5 |
| 2003 | 55.8 | 169.7 |
| 2002 | 55.2 | 168.8 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 167.6 |
| 2000 | 54 | 166.3 |
| 1999 | 53.4 | 165 |
| 1998 | 52.7 | 163.7 |
| 1997 | 52 | 162.5 |
| 1996 | 51.3 | 161.1 |
| 1995 | 50.6 | 159.8 |
| 1994 | 49.9 | 158.5 |
| 1993 | 49.1 | 157.2 |
| 1992 | 48.4 | 155.9 |
| 1991 | 47.6 | 155 |
| 1990 | 46.8 | 154.7 |
| 1989 | 46 | 154.5 |
| 1988 | 45.3 | 154.1 |
| 1987 | 44.6 | 153.4 |
| 1986 | 43.9 | 152.9 |
| 1985 | 43.2 | 152.7 |
| 1984 | 42.5 | 152.7 |
| 1983 | 41.9 | 152.6 |
| 1982 | 41.3 | 152.4 |
| 1981 | 40.7 | 151.6 |
| 1980 | 40.1 | 150.4 |
| 1979 | 39.5 | 149.1 |
| 1978 | 38.9 | 147.7 |
| 1977 | 38.3 | 146.2 |
| 1976 | 37.8 | 143.8 |
| 1975 | 37.2 | 140.3 |
| 1974 | 36.6 | 136.8 |
| 1973 | 36 | 134.1 |
| 1972 | 35.4 | 132.3 |
| 1971 | 34.9 | 130.4 |
| 1970 | 34.3 | 128.5 |
| 1969 | 33.7 | 126.5 |
| 1968 | 33.1 | 124.5 |
| 1967 | 32.6 | 122.4 |
| 1966 | 32 | 120 |
| 1965 | 31.4 | 117.1 |
| 1964 | 30.8 | 114.3 |
| 1963 | 30.2 | 111.4 |
| 1962 | 29.6 | 108.5 |
| 1961 | 29 | 105.7 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Samoa
|
|
| 2024 | 88.1% | 17.4% |
| 2023 | 88% | 17.5% |
| 2022 | 87.9% | 17.6% |
| 2021 | 87.8% | 17.7% |
| 2020 | 87.7% | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 87.6% | 18.1% |
| 2018 | 87.6% | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 87.5% | 18.5% |
| 2016 | 87.4% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | 87.4% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 87.3% | 19.1% |
| 2013 | 87.2% | 19.4% |
| 2012 | 87.2% | 19.6% |
| 2011 | 87.1% | 19.9% |
| 2010 | 87.1% | 20.1% |
| 2009 | 87% | 20.3% |
| 2008 | 87% | 20.5% |
| 2007 | 86.9% | 20.7% |
| 2006 | 86.8% | 21% |
| 2005 | 86.8% | 21.2% |
| 2004 | 86.7% | 21.5% |
| 2003 | 86.7% | 21.7% |
| 2002 | 86.6% | 21.9% |
| 2001 | 86.4% | 22.1% |
| 2000 | 86.1% | 22% |
| 1999 | 85.8% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 85.5% | 21.8% |
| 1997 | 85.2% | 21.7% |
| 1996 | 84.9% | 21.6% |
| 1995 | 84.5% | 21.5% |
| 1994 | 84.2% | 21.4% |
| 1993 | 83.9% | 21.3% |
| 1992 | 83.6% | 21.3% |
| 1991 | 83.4% | 21.2% |
| 1990 | 83.3% | 21.2% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 21.2% |
| 1988 | 83% | 21.2% |
| 1987 | 82.9% | 21.2% |
| 1986 | 82.8% | 21.2% |
| 1985 | 82.6% | 21.2% |
| 1984 | 82.5% | 21.2% |
| 1983 | 82.4% | 21.2% |
| 1982 | 82.2% | 21.2% |
| 1981 | 81.8% | 21.2% |
| 1980 | 81.2% | 21.2% |
| 1979 | 80.7% | 21.2% |
| 1978 | 80.1% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 79.6% | 21.1% |
| 1976 | 79% | 21.1% |
| 1975 | 78.4% | 21% |
| 1974 | 77.8% | 20.9% |
| 1973 | 77.2% | 20.8% |
| 1972 | 76.5% | 20.8% |
| 1971 | 75.9% | 20.6% |
| 1970 | 75.2% | 20.4% |
| 1969 | 74.5% | 20.1% |
| 1968 | 73.9% | 19.8% |
| 1967 | 73.1% | 19.6% |
| 1966 | 72.4% | 19.4% |
| 1965 | 71.7% | 19.3% |
| 1964 | 71% | 19.2% |
| 1963 | 70.2% | 19.1% |
| 1962 | 69.4% | 19.1% |
| 1961 | 68.7% | 19% |
| 1960 | 67.8% | 18.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 86.7% to 88.1% in Chile and from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa.
Densely populated cities
|
Chile
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Santiago | 6.26M |
| Puente Alto | 574K |
| Antofagasta | 349K |
| Vina del Mar | 333K |
| San Bernardo | 301K |
| Valparaiso | 297K |
| Temuco | 282K |
| Concepcion | 218K |
| Coquimbo | 204K |
| Arica | 202K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
