Samoa has a population density of 203.1 people per square mile compared to 136.7 people in South Africa. Samoa has 140,314 sq ft of land per person vs 205,338 sq ft in South Africa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Samoa and South Africa are ranked 109th and 136th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Samoa has 0.003% of the world's population and 0.002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.79% of the population and 0.81% of the land area for South Africa, hence the population density in Samoa is 48.6% higher than in South Africa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 203.1 ppl/mi² | 136.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 109/197 | 136/197 |
| Population |
220288
|
65314246
|
| Land area | 1,073 sq mi | 468,377 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,253 sq ft | 204,002 sq ft |
| Rural population | 82.6% | 30.7% |
| Urban population | 17.4% | 69.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 14.8% |
Samoa vs South Africa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Samoa increased by 19.2%, compared to a 30.6% growth in South Africa.
In 2004, Samoa ranked 104th for population density and is in 109th place now. South Africa was 132nd in 2004 and ranks 136th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 203.1 | 136.7 |
| 2023 | 201.9 | 135 |
| 2022 | 200.5 | 133.2 |
| 2021 | 199.2 | 131.3 |
| 2020 | 197.5 | 129.3 |
| 2019 | 195.4 | 127.2 |
| 2018 | 193.4 | 125.1 |
| 2017 | 191.4 | 123.1 |
| 2016 | 186.2 | 122.3 |
| 2015 | 184.7 | 121.1 |
| 2014 | 183.1 | 118.7 |
| 2013 | 181.5 | 116.7 |
| 2012 | 179.8 | 114.8 |
| 2011 | 178.2 | 113.1 |
| 2010 | 176.7 | 111.8 |
| 2009 | 175.3 | 110.4 |
| 2008 | 174 | 109.1 |
| 2007 | 172.7 | 107.9 |
| 2006 | 171.8 | 106.7 |
| 2005 | 171.1 | 105.7 |
| 2004 | 170.5 | 104.6 |
| 2003 | 169.7 | 103.5 |
| 2002 | 168.8 | 102.5 |
| 2001 | 167.6 | 101.6 |
| 2000 | 166.3 | 100.7 |
| 1999 | 165 | 99.8 |
| 1998 | 163.7 | 98.7 |
| 1997 | 162.5 | 97.5 |
| 1996 | 161.1 | 96.3 |
| 1995 | 159.8 | 95.1 |
| 1994 | 158.5 | 94 |
| 1993 | 157.2 | 92.4 |
| 1992 | 155.9 | 90.6 |
| 1991 | 155 | 89 |
| 1990 | 154.7 | 87 |
| 1989 | 154.5 | 84.6 |
| 1988 | 154.1 | 82.2 |
| 1987 | 153.4 | 79.7 |
| 1986 | 152.9 | 77.2 |
| 1985 | 152.7 | 74.8 |
| 1984 | 152.7 | 72.4 |
| 1983 | 152.6 | 69.9 |
| 1982 | 152.4 | 67.5 |
| 1981 | 151.6 | 65.2 |
| 1980 | 150.4 | 63 |
| 1979 | 149.1 | 61.1 |
| 1978 | 147.7 | 59.5 |
| 1977 | 146.2 | 57.9 |
| 1976 | 143.8 | 56.4 |
| 1975 | 140.3 | 54.9 |
| 1974 | 136.8 | 53.4 |
| 1973 | 134.1 | 51.9 |
| 1972 | 132.3 | 50.4 |
| 1971 | 130.4 | 49 |
| 1970 | 128.5 | 47.6 |
| 1969 | 126.5 | 46.1 |
| 1968 | 124.5 | 44.7 |
| 1967 | 122.4 | 43.4 |
| 1966 | 120 | 42 |
| 1965 | 117.1 | 40.8 |
| 1964 | 114.3 | 39.5 |
| 1963 | 111.4 | 38.3 |
| 1962 | 108.5 | 37.2 |
| 1961 | 105.7 | 36.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 17.4% | 69.3% |
| 2023 | 17.5% | 68.8% |
| 2022 | 17.6% | 68.3% |
| 2021 | 17.7% | 67.8% |
| 2020 | 17.9% | 67.4% |
| 2019 | 18.1% | 66.9% |
| 2018 | 18.2% | 66.4% |
| 2017 | 18.5% | 65.8% |
| 2016 | 18.7% | 65.3% |
| 2015 | 18.9% | 64.8% |
| 2014 | 19.1% | 64.3% |
| 2013 | 19.4% | 63.8% |
| 2012 | 19.6% | 63.3% |
| 2011 | 19.9% | 62.7% |
| 2010 | 20.1% | 62.2% |
| 2009 | 20.3% | 61.7% |
| 2008 | 20.5% | 61.2% |
| 2007 | 20.7% | 60.6% |
| 2006 | 21% | 60.1% |
| 2005 | 21.2% | 59.5% |
| 2004 | 21.5% | 59% |
| 2003 | 21.7% | 58.4% |
| 2002 | 21.9% | 57.9% |
| 2001 | 22.1% | 57.4% |
| 2000 | 22% | 56.9% |
| 1999 | 21.9% | 56.4% |
| 1998 | 21.8% | 55.9% |
| 1997 | 21.7% | 55.4% |
| 1996 | 21.6% | 55% |
| 1995 | 21.5% | 54.5% |
| 1994 | 21.4% | 54% |
| 1993 | 21.3% | 53.5% |
| 1992 | 21.3% | 53% |
| 1991 | 21.2% | 52.6% |
| 1990 | 21.2% | 52% |
| 1989 | 21.2% | 51.5% |
| 1988 | 21.2% | 51% |
| 1987 | 21.2% | 50.4% |
| 1986 | 21.2% | 49.9% |
| 1985 | 21.2% | 49.4% |
| 1984 | 21.2% | 49.1% |
| 1983 | 21.2% | 48.9% |
| 1982 | 21.2% | 48.8% |
| 1981 | 21.2% | 48.6% |
| 1980 | 21.2% | 48.4% |
| 1979 | 21.2% | 48.3% |
| 1978 | 21.1% | 48.3% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 48.2% |
| 1976 | 21.1% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 21% | 48.1% |
| 1974 | 20.9% | 48% |
| 1973 | 20.8% | 48% |
| 1972 | 20.8% | 47.9% |
| 1971 | 20.6% | 47.9% |
| 1970 | 20.4% | 47.8% |
| 1969 | 20.1% | 47.7% |
| 1968 | 19.8% | 47.6% |
| 1967 | 19.6% | 47.5% |
| 1966 | 19.4% | 47.4% |
| 1965 | 19.3% | 47.2% |
| 1964 | 19.2% | 47.1% |
| 1963 | 19.1% | 47% |
| 1962 | 19.1% | 46.9% |
| 1961 | 19% | 46.8% |
| 1960 | 18.9% | 46.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 21.5% to 17.4% in Samoa and from 59% to 69.3% in South Africa.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Johannesburg | 4.43M |
| Cape Town | 3.78M |
| Soweto | 1.27M |
| Pietermaritzburg | 839K |
| Pretoria | 742K |
| Durban | 595K |
| Rustenburg | 550K |
| Randburg | 337K |
| Port Elizabeth | 312K |
| East London | 267K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons