Ireland has a population density of 202.3 people per square mile compared to 200.5 people in Tanzania. Ireland has 139,638 sq ft of land per person vs 148,726 sq ft in Tanzania. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Ireland and Tanzania are ranked 112th and 113th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Ireland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.05% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.84% of the population and 0.59% of the land area for Tanzania, hence the population density in Ireland is 0.9% higher than in Tanzania.
Population density comparison
Ireland
|
Tanzania
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 202.3 ppl/mi² | 200.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 112/197 | 113/197 |
| Population |
5474763
|
72166806
|
| Land area | 26,599 sq mi | 342,009 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 137,823 sq ft | 139,070 sq ft |
| Rural population | 35.2% | 61.9% |
| Urban population | 64.8% | 38.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 6.88% |
Ireland vs Tanzania:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Ireland increased by 32.2%, compared to a 79.9% growth in Tanzania.
In 2004, Ireland ranked 115th for population density and is in 112th place now. Tanzania was 130th in 2004 and ranks 113th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Ireland
|
Tanzania
|
|
| 2024 | 202.3 | 200.5 |
| 2023 | 199.5 | 194.8 |
| 2022 | 196 | 189.2 |
| 2021 | 192.1 | 183.7 |
| 2020 | 189.5 | 178.3 |
| 2019 | 187.1 | 173 |
| 2018 | 184.1 | 167.9 |
| 2017 | 181.5 | 162.7 |
| 2016 | 179.1 | 157.4 |
| 2015 | 176.8 | 152.1 |
| 2014 | 175.1 | 147.2 |
| 2013 | 173.8 | 142.8 |
| 2012 | 172.9 | 138.5 |
| 2011 | 172.2 | 134.6 |
| 2010 | 171.4 | 130.9 |
| 2009 | 170.5 | 127.6 |
| 2008 | 168.8 | 124.5 |
| 2007 | 165.4 | 121.2 |
| 2006 | 160.7 | 117.8 |
| 2005 | 156.4 | 114.6 |
| 2004 | 153 | 111.4 |
| 2003 | 150.3 | 108.4 |
| 2002 | 147.8 | 105.6 |
| 2001 | 145.4 | 102.9 |
| 2000 | 143.1 | 100.2 |
| 1999 | 141.2 | 97.4 |
| 1998 | 139.6 | 94.8 |
| 1997 | 138.1 | 92.3 |
| 1996 | 136.8 | 90.5 |
| 1995 | 135.7 | 88.8 |
| 1994 | 135 | 86.1 |
| 1993 | 134.5 | 82.8 |
| 1992 | 133.8 | 80.3 |
| 1991 | 132.9 | 78.3 |
| 1990 | 132.1 | 76.3 |
| 1989 | 132 | 74.4 |
| 1988 | 132.5 | 72.4 |
| 1987 | 133.1 | 70.3 |
| 1986 | 133.1 | 68 |
| 1985 | 133 | 65.8 |
| 1984 | 132.8 | 63.7 |
| 1983 | 132 | 61.6 |
| 1982 | 131.1 | 59.6 |
| 1981 | 129.8 | 57.8 |
| 1980 | 128.3 | 56.1 |
| 1979 | 126.8 | 54.4 |
| 1978 | 125.2 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 123.4 | 50.7 |
| 1976 | 121.7 | 48.9 |
| 1975 | 119.9 | 47.2 |
| 1974 | 118 | 45.5 |
| 1973 | 116 | 43.9 |
| 1972 | 114.2 | 42.3 |
| 1971 | 112.5 | 40.9 |
| 1970 | 111.2 | 39.5 |
| 1969 | 110.3 | 38.1 |
| 1968 | 109.6 | 36.8 |
| 1967 | 109.1 | 35.7 |
| 1966 | 108.6 | 34.6 |
| 1965 | 108.2 | 33.5 |
| 1964 | 107.8 | 32.5 |
| 1963 | 107.2 | 31.6 |
| 1962 | 106.6 | 30.7 |
| 1961 | 106.2 | 29.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Ireland
|
Tanzania
|
|
| 2024 | 64.8% | 38.1% |
| 2023 | 64.5% | 37.4% |
| 2022 | 64.2% | 36.7% |
| 2021 | 63.9% | 36% |
| 2020 | 63.7% | 35.2% |
| 2019 | 63.4% | 34.5% |
| 2018 | 63.2% | 33.8% |
| 2017 | 62.9% | 33.1% |
| 2016 | 62.7% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 62.5% | 31.6% |
| 2014 | 62.3% | 30.9% |
| 2013 | 62.1% | 30.2% |
| 2012 | 61.9% | 29.5% |
| 2011 | 61.7% | 28.8% |
| 2010 | 61.5% | 28.1% |
| 2009 | 61.3% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 61.1% | 26.8% |
| 2007 | 60.9% | 26.1% |
| 2006 | 60.7% | 25.5% |
| 2005 | 60.5% | 24.8% |
| 2004 | 60.2% | 24.2% |
| 2003 | 59.9% | 23.6% |
| 2002 | 59.6% | 23% |
| 2001 | 59.4% | 22.7% |
| 2000 | 59.2% | 22.3% |
| 1999 | 58.9% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 58.7% | 21.6% |
| 1997 | 58.4% | 21.2% |
| 1996 | 58.2% | 20.9% |
| 1995 | 57.9% | 20.5% |
| 1994 | 57.7% | 20.2% |
| 1993 | 57.5% | 19.9% |
| 1992 | 57.3% | 19.5% |
| 1991 | 57.1% | 19.2% |
| 1990 | 56.9% | 18.9% |
| 1989 | 56.8% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 56.7% | 18.2% |
| 1987 | 56.6% | 17.7% |
| 1986 | 56.4% | 17.2% |
| 1985 | 56.3% | 16.8% |
| 1984 | 56.1% | 16.3% |
| 1983 | 56% | 15.9% |
| 1982 | 55.8% | 15.4% |
| 1981 | 55.6% | 15% |
| 1980 | 55.3% | 14.6% |
| 1979 | 55% | 14.1% |
| 1978 | 54.7% | 13.7% |
| 1977 | 54.3% | 12.8% |
| 1976 | 54% | 11.9% |
| 1975 | 53.6% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 53.3% | 10.4% |
| 1973 | 53% | 9.7% |
| 1972 | 52.6% | 9.05% |
| 1971 | 52.3% | 8.43% |
| 1970 | 51.3% | 7.85% |
| 1969 | 50.1% | 7.31% |
| 1968 | 49% | 6.8% |
| 1967 | 47.8% | 6.37% |
| 1966 | 46.6% | 6.2% |
| 1965 | 46.2% | 6.03% |
| 1964 | 46% | 5.87% |
| 1963 | 45.8% | 5.7% |
| 1962 | 45.6% | 5.55% |
| 1961 | 45.4% | 5.39% |
| 1960 | 45.2% | 5.25% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 60.2% to 64.8% in Ireland and from 24.2% to 38.1% in Tanzania.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
