Denmark has a population density of 387 people per square mile compared to 213.7 people in Uzbekistan. Denmark has 77,304 sq ft of land per person vs 132,907 sq ft in Uzbekistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Denmark and Uzbekistan are ranked 66th and 106th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Denmark has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.03% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.45% of the population and 0.3% of the land area for Uzbekistan, hence the population density in Denmark is 81.1% higher than in Uzbekistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 387 ppl/mi² | 213.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 66/197 | 106/197 |
| Population |
6018959
|
37592263
|
| Land area | 15,444 sq mi | 170,136 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 72,036 sq ft | 130,442 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11.4% | 49.4% |
| Urban population | 88.6% | 50.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 8.13% |
Denmark vs Uzbekistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Denmark increased by 10.6%, compared to a 38.2% growth in Uzbekistan.
In 2004, Denmark ranked 57th for population density and is in 66th place now. Uzbekistan was 114th in 2004 and ranks 106th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 387 | 213.7 |
| 2023 | 385 | 209.6 |
| 2022 | 382 | 205.4 |
| 2021 | 379 | 201.3 |
| 2020 | 378 | 197.4 |
| 2019 | 376 | 193.8 |
| 2018 | 375 | 190.3 |
| 2017 | 373 | 187 |
| 2016 | 371 | 183.9 |
| 2015 | 368 | 180.8 |
| 2014 | 365 | 179.6 |
| 2013 | 364 | 176.7 |
| 2012 | 362 | 173.9 |
| 2011 | 361 | 171.3 |
| 2010 | 359 | 168.7 |
| 2009 | 358 | 166 |
| 2008 | 356 | 163.3 |
| 2007 | 354 | 160.8 |
| 2006 | 352 | 158.7 |
| 2005 | 351 | 156.6 |
| 2004 | 350 | 154.7 |
| 2003 | 349 | 152.8 |
| 2002 | 348 | 150.9 |
| 2001 | 347 | 149.1 |
| 2000 | 346 | 147.3 |
| 1999 | 345 | 149 |
| 1998 | 343 | 146.9 |
| 1997 | 342 | 144.7 |
| 1996 | 341 | 142.2 |
| 1995 | 339 | 139.5 |
| 1994 | 337 | 136.8 |
| 1993 | 336 | 133.9 |
| 1992 | 335 | 130.8 |
| 1991 | 334 | - |
| 1990 | 333 | - |
| 1989 | 332 | - |
| 1988 | 332 | - |
| 1987 | 332 | - |
| 1986 | 332 | - |
| 1985 | 331 | - |
| 1984 | 331 | - |
| 1983 | 331 | - |
| 1982 | 331 | - |
| 1981 | 332 | - |
| 1980 | 332 | - |
| 1979 | 331 | - |
| 1978 | 330 | - |
| 1977 | 329 | - |
| 1976 | 328 | - |
| 1975 | 328 | - |
| 1974 | 327 | - |
| 1973 | 325 | - |
| 1972 | 323 | - |
| 1971 | 321 | - |
| 1970 | 319 | - |
| 1969 | 317 | - |
| 1968 | 315 | - |
| 1967 | 313 | - |
| 1966 | 311 | - |
| 1965 | 308 | - |
| 1964 | 306 | - |
| 1963 | 303 | - |
| 1962 | 301 | - |
| 1961 | 298.6 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 88.6% | 50.6% |
| 2023 | 88.5% | 50.5% |
| 2022 | 88.4% | 50.5% |
| 2021 | 88.2% | 50.4% |
| 2020 | 88.1% | 50.4% |
| 2019 | 88% | 50.4% |
| 2018 | 87.9% | 50.5% |
| 2017 | 87.8% | 50.5% |
| 2016 | 87.6% | 50.7% |
| 2015 | 87.5% | 50.7% |
| 2014 | 87.4% | 50.8% |
| 2013 | 87.3% | 50.9% |
| 2012 | 87.1% | 51% |
| 2011 | 87% | 51.2% |
| 2010 | 86.8% | 51% |
| 2009 | 86.7% | 50.5% |
| 2008 | 86.5% | 50% |
| 2007 | 86.3% | 49.5% |
| 2006 | 86.1% | 49% |
| 2005 | 85.9% | 48.5% |
| 2004 | 85.6% | 48.1% |
| 2003 | 85.4% | 47.6% |
| 2002 | 85.2% | 47.1% |
| 2001 | 85.2% | 46.6% |
| 2000 | 85.1% | 46.1% |
| 1999 | 85.1% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 85.1% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 85% | 44.7% |
| 1996 | 85% | 44.2% |
| 1995 | 85% | 43.7% |
| 1994 | 85% | 43.3% |
| 1993 | 84.9% | 42.8% |
| 1992 | 84.9% | 42.3% |
| 1991 | 84.9% | 41.8% |
| 1990 | 84.8% | 41.4% |
| 1989 | 84.8% | 40.9% |
| 1988 | 84.7% | 40.7% |
| 1987 | 84.6% | 40.7% |
| 1986 | 84.5% | 40.7% |
| 1985 | 84.4% | 40.7% |
| 1984 | 84.2% | 40.7% |
| 1983 | 84.1% | 40.7% |
| 1982 | 84% | 40.8% |
| 1981 | 83.9% | 40.8% |
| 1980 | 83.7% | 40.8% |
| 1979 | 83.4% | 40.8% |
| 1978 | 83.2% | 40.5% |
| 1977 | 82.9% | 40.1% |
| 1976 | 82.6% | 39.6% |
| 1975 | 82.1% | 39.1% |
| 1974 | 81.7% | 38.6% |
| 1973 | 81.2% | 38.1% |
| 1972 | 80.7% | 37.7% |
| 1971 | 80.2% | 37.2% |
| 1970 | 79.7% | 36.7% |
| 1969 | 79.2% | 36.4% |
| 1968 | 78.7% | 36.1% |
| 1967 | 78.2% | 35.8% |
| 1966 | 77.6% | 35.6% |
| 1965 | 77% | 35.3% |
| 1964 | 76.4% | 35% |
| 1963 | 75.8% | 34.8% |
| 1962 | 75.1% | 34.5% |
| 1961 | 74.4% | 34.2% |
| 1960 | 73.7% | 34% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 85.6% to 88.6% in Denmark and from 48.1% to 50.6% in Uzbekistan.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons