The Congo has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 48 people in Finland. The Congo has 581,285 sq ft of land per person vs 646,303 sq ft in Finland. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Congo and Finland are ranked 174th and 173rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Congo has 0.08% of the world's population and 0.23% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.2% of the land area for Finland, hence the population density in the Congo is 0.007% lower than in Finland.
Population density comparison
Congo
|
Finland
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 48 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 174/197 | 173/197 |
| Population |
6607609
|
5643254
|
| Land area | 131,854 sq mi | 117,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,436 sq ft | 580,393 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30.4% | 14.1% |
| Urban population | 69.6% | 85.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 56.3% | 0% |
the Congo vs Finland:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Congo increased by 77.6%, compared to a 8.05% growth in Finland.
In 2004, the Congo ranked 174th for population density and is in 174th place still. Finland was 157th in 2004 and ranks 173rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Congo
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 48 |
| 2023 | 46.9 | 47.6 |
| 2022 | 45.8 | 47.3 |
| 2021 | 44.7 | 47.2 |
| 2020 | 43.6 | 47.1 |
| 2019 | 42.6 | 47.1 |
| 2018 | 41.6 | 47 |
| 2017 | 40.6 | 46.9 |
| 2016 | 39.6 | 46.8 |
| 2015 | 38.7 | 46.7 |
| 2014 | 37.7 | 46.5 |
| 2013 | 36.8 | 46.4 |
| 2012 | 36 | 46.1 |
| 2011 | 35 | 45.9 |
| 2010 | 33.8 | 45.7 |
| 2009 | 32.5 | 45.5 |
| 2008 | 31.2 | 45.3 |
| 2007 | 30.2 | 45 |
| 2006 | 29.1 | 44.9 |
| 2005 | 28 | 44.6 |
| 2004 | 27 | 44.5 |
| 2003 | 26.1 | 44.3 |
| 2002 | 25.4 | 44.2 |
| 2001 | 24.8 | 44.1 |
| 2000 | 23.9 | 44 |
| 1999 | 23 | 43.9 |
| 1998 | 22.4 | 43.8 |
| 1997 | 21.9 | 43.7 |
| 1996 | 21.4 | 43.6 |
| 1995 | 20.9 | 43.4 |
| 1994 | 20.3 | 43.3 |
| 1993 | 19.7 | 43.1 |
| 1992 | 19.1 | 42.9 |
| 1991 | 18.6 | 42.6 |
| 1990 | 18.1 | 42.4 |
| 1989 | 17.5 | 42.2 |
| 1988 | 17 | 42.1 |
| 1987 | 16.6 | 41.9 |
| 1986 | 16.1 | 41.8 |
| 1985 | 15.6 | 41.7 |
| 1984 | 15.2 | 41.5 |
| 1983 | 14.8 | 41.3 |
| 1982 | 14.5 | 41 |
| 1981 | 14.2 | 40.8 |
| 1980 | 13.9 | 40.6 |
| 1979 | 13.6 | 40.5 |
| 1978 | 13.3 | 40.4 |
| 1977 | 13 | 40.3 |
| 1976 | 12.6 | 40.2 |
| 1975 | 12.3 | 40.1 |
| 1974 | 12 | 39.9 |
| 1973 | 11.6 | 39.7 |
| 1972 | 11.3 | 39.5 |
| 1971 | 10.9 | 39.2 |
| 1970 | 10.6 | 39.2 |
| 1969 | 10.3 | 39.3 |
| 1968 | 9.98 | 39.3 |
| 1967 | 9.7 | 39.2 |
| 1966 | 9.42 | 39 |
| 1965 | 9.16 | 38.8 |
| 1964 | 8.91 | 38.7 |
| 1963 | 8.67 | 38.5 |
| 1962 | 8.44 | 38.2 |
| 1961 | 8.22 | 37.9 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Congo
|
Finland
|
|
| 2024 | 69.6% | 85.9% |
| 2023 | 69.2% | 85.8% |
| 2022 | 68.7% | 85.7% |
| 2021 | 68.3% | 85.6% |
| 2020 | 67.8% | 85.5% |
| 2019 | 67.4% | 85.4% |
| 2018 | 66.9% | 85.4% |
| 2017 | 66.5% | 85.3% |
| 2016 | 66% | 85.3% |
| 2015 | 65.5% | 85.2% |
| 2014 | 65.1% | 85.2% |
| 2013 | 64.6% | 85.1% |
| 2012 | 64.2% | 84.8% |
| 2011 | 63.7% | 84.3% |
| 2010 | 63.3% | 83.8% |
| 2009 | 62.8% | 83.4% |
| 2008 | 62.3% | 83.3% |
| 2007 | 61.9% | 83.2% |
| 2006 | 61.4% | 83% |
| 2005 | 61% | 82.9% |
| 2004 | 60.5% | 82.8% |
| 2003 | 60.1% | 82.6% |
| 2002 | 59.6% | 82.5% |
| 2001 | 59.2% | 82.4% |
| 2000 | 58.7% | 82.2% |
| 1999 | 58.2% | 81.9% |
| 1998 | 57.8% | 81.7% |
| 1997 | 57.3% | 81.5% |
| 1996 | 56.8% | 81.2% |
| 1995 | 56.4% | 81% |
| 1994 | 56% | 80.7% |
| 1993 | 55.6% | 80.4% |
| 1992 | 55.2% | 80.1% |
| 1991 | 54.7% | 79.8% |
| 1990 | 54.3% | 79.4% |
| 1989 | 53.9% | 78.7% |
| 1988 | 53.5% | 78% |
| 1987 | 53.1% | 77.3% |
| 1986 | 52.6% | 76.6% |
| 1985 | 52.2% | 75.8% |
| 1984 | 51.6% | 75% |
| 1983 | 50.6% | 74.2% |
| 1982 | 49.7% | 73.4% |
| 1981 | 48.8% | 72.5% |
| 1980 | 47.9% | 71.7% |
| 1979 | 46.9% | 71% |
| 1978 | 46% | 70.2% |
| 1977 | 45.1% | 69.4% |
| 1976 | 44.2% | 68.6% |
| 1975 | 43.3% | 67.8% |
| 1974 | 42.4% | 67% |
| 1973 | 41.5% | 66.2% |
| 1972 | 40.7% | 65.4% |
| 1971 | 39.9% | 64.5% |
| 1970 | 39.1% | 63.7% |
| 1969 | 38.3% | 62.9% |
| 1968 | 37.6% | 62.1% |
| 1967 | 36.8% | 61.3% |
| 1966 | 36% | 60.5% |
| 1965 | 35.3% | 59.7% |
| 1964 | 34.5% | 58.8% |
| 1963 | 33.8% | 58% |
| 1962 | 33% | 57.2% |
| 1961 | 32.3% | 56.3% |
| 1960 | 31.6% | 55.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 60.5% to 69.6% in the Congo and from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland.
Densely populated cities
|
Congo
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Brazzaville | 2.15M |
| Pointe-Noire | 1.42M |
| Kayes | 71.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
