Cuba has a population density of 271.8 people per square mile compared to 191.2 people in Eswatini. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 150,387 sq ft in Eswatini. Cuba and Eswatini rank 90th and 118th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.14% of the world's population and 0.07% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for Eswatini, making the population density in Cuba 42.2% higher than in Eswatini.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Cuba
|
Eswatini
|
|
| 2026 | 271.8 | 191.2 |
| 2025 | 272.9 | 189.1 |
| 2024 | 274 | 187.1 |
| 2023 | 275 | 185.3 |
| 2022 | 276 | 183.5 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 181.7 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 179.6 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 177.7 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 176 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 174.4 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 173.1 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 172.1 |
| 2014 | 281 | 171.1 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 170.2 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 169.2 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 168.3 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 167.4 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 166.4 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 165.4 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 164.2 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 163.3 |
| 2005 | 274 | 162.5 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 161.6 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 160.6 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 159.5 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 158.3 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 156.8 |
| 1999 | 267 | 155.2 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 153.5 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 151.6 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 149.1 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 146.1 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 146.2 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 146.3 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | 142.1 |
| 1991 | 258.5 | 136.8 |
| 1990 | 256.4 | 131.4 |
| 1989 | 254 | 126.2 |
| 1988 | 251.6 | 120.4 |
| 1987 | 249.2 | 115 |
| 1986 | 247 | 110.6 |
| 1985 | 244.9 | 106.3 |
| 1984 | 242.9 | 102.5 |
| 1983 | 240.9 | 99.2 |
| 1982 | 239 | 96 |
| 1981 | 237.5 | 92.9 |
| 1980 | 236.4 | 89.8 |
| 1979 | 235.4 | 86.9 |
| 1978 | 234.2 | 84.1 |
| 1977 | 232.7 | 81.4 |
| 1976 | 230.8 | 78.8 |
| 1975 | 228.6 | 76.4 |
| 1974 | 226.1 | 74.2 |
| 1973 | 223.2 | 72.1 |
| 1972 | 220 | 70.1 |
| 1971 | 216.5 | 68.2 |
| 1970 | 212.8 | 66.4 |
| 1969 | 209 | 64.7 |
| 1968 | 205.2 | 63.1 |
| 1967 | 201.4 | 61.6 |
| 1966 | 197.6 | 60 |
| 1965 | 193.7 | 58.5 |
| 1964 | 189.7 | 57 |
| 1963 | 185.7 | 55.7 |
| 1962 | 181.9 | 54.4 |
| 1961 | 178.1 | 53.2 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cuba/eswatini | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Cuba decreased by 0.96%, compared to a 17.1% growth in Eswatini.
In 2006, Cuba ranked 76th by population density and is 90th now. Eswatini was 114th in 2006 and ranks 118th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Cuba
|
Eswatini
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 271.8 ppl/mi² | 191.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 90/197 | 118/197 |
| Population |
10894785
|
1273390
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 6,641 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 148,967 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.8% | 73.8% |
| Urban population | 77.2% | 26.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.9% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Eswatini
|
|
| 2024 | 77.2% | 26.2% |
| 2023 | 77.1% | 25.8% |
| 2022 | 77.1% | 25.4% |
| 2021 | 77.1% | 25% |
| 2020 | 77.1% | 24.7% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 24.3% |
| 2018 | 77% | 24.1% |
| 2017 | 77% | 23.8% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 23.5% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 23.3% |
| 2014 | 76.8% | 23% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 22.8% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 22.6% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 22.5% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 22.3% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 22.2% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 22.2% |
| 2007 | 76.2% | 22.1% |
| 2006 | 76.1% | 22.2% |
| 2005 | 76% | 22.2% |
| 2004 | 75.9% | 22.3% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 22.4% |
| 2002 | 75.9% | 22.6% |
| 2001 | 75.9% | 22.7% |
| 2000 | 75.6% | 22.8% |
| 1999 | 75.4% | 23% |
| 1998 | 75.3% | 23% |
| 1997 | 75.1% | 23.1% |
| 1996 | 74.8% | 23.1% |
| 1995 | 74.6% | 23.1% |
| 1994 | 74.5% | 23% |
| 1993 | 74.5% | 23% |
| 1992 | 74.4% | 23% |
| 1991 | 74.1% | 23% |
| 1990 | 73.7% | 22.9% |
| 1989 | 73.3% | 22.9% |
| 1988 | 72.7% | 22.9% |
| 1987 | 72.1% | 22.8% |
| 1986 | 71.6% | 22.7% |
| 1985 | 71.1% | 22.5% |
| 1984 | 70.8% | 22.1% |
| 1983 | 70.3% | 21.4% |
| 1982 | 69.5% | 20.6% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 19.7% |
| 1980 | 68.4% | 18.8% |
| 1979 | 67.7% | 17.8% |
| 1978 | 66.9% | 16.8% |
| 1977 | 65.9% | 15.9% |
| 1976 | 64.9% | 15.1% |
| 1975 | 63.9% | 14.3% |
| 1974 | 63% | 13.5% |
| 1973 | 62.1% | 12.6% |
| 1972 | 61.3% | 11.8% |
| 1971 | 60.7% | 10.9% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 10.1% |
| 1969 | 59.9% | 9.25% |
| 1968 | 59.6% | 8.49% |
| 1967 | 59.4% | 7.79% |
| 1966 | 59.1% | 7.16% |
| 1965 | 58.8% | 6.59% |
| 1964 | 58.6% | 6.03% |
| 1963 | 58.3% | 5.5% |
| 1962 | 58.1% | 4.99% |
| 1961 | 57.9% | 4.51% |
| 1960 | 57.7% | 4.06% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cuba/eswatini | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 75.9% to 77.2% in Cuba and from 22.3% to 26.2% in Eswatini.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/cuba/eswatini | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2005–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.