Cuba has a population density of 274 people per square mile compared to 174.4 people in Mexico. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 162,251 sq ft in Mexico. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Cuba and Mexico are ranked 88th and 123rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 1.61% of the population and 1.31% of the land area for Mexico, hence the population density in Cuba is 57.1% higher than in Mexico.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 274 ppl/mi² | 174.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 88/197 | 123/197 |
| Population |
10937204
|
132790957
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 750,563 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 159,899 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.3% | 18.1% |
| Urban population | 77.7% | 81.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.7% | 17.3% |
Cuba vs Mexico:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Cuba increased by 0.15%, compared to a 25.4% growth in Mexico.
In 2004, Cuba ranked 74th for population density and is in 88th place now. Mexico was 120th in 2004 and ranks 123rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 274 | 174.4 |
| 2023 | 275 | 172.9 |
| 2022 | 276 | 171.4 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 170.1 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 168.9 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 167.6 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 166 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 164.4 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 162.9 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 161.3 |
| 2014 | 281 | 159.6 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 157.7 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 155.6 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 153.5 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 151.4 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 149.2 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 147.1 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 144.9 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 142.9 |
| 2005 | 274 | 141 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 139.1 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 137.2 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 135.3 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 133.4 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 131.4 |
| 1999 | 267 | 129.4 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 127.3 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 125.3 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 123.2 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 121.1 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 118.9 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 116.8 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | 114.6 |
| 1991 | 258.5 | 112.5 |
| 1990 | 256.4 | 110.3 |
| 1989 | 254 | 108.2 |
| 1988 | 251.6 | 106.2 |
| 1987 | 249.2 | 104.1 |
| 1986 | 247 | 102 |
| 1985 | 244.9 | 100 |
| 1984 | 242.9 | 97.9 |
| 1983 | 240.9 | 95.9 |
| 1982 | 239 | 93.8 |
| 1981 | 237.5 | 91.8 |
| 1980 | 236.4 | 89.7 |
| 1979 | 235.4 | 87.5 |
| 1978 | 234.2 | 85.2 |
| 1977 | 232.7 | 83 |
| 1976 | 230.8 | 80.8 |
| 1975 | 228.6 | 78.6 |
| 1974 | 226.1 | 76.4 |
| 1973 | 223.2 | 74.2 |
| 1972 | 220 | 72 |
| 1971 | 216.5 | 69.8 |
| 1970 | 212.8 | 67.7 |
| 1969 | 209 | 65.6 |
| 1968 | 205.2 | 63.5 |
| 1967 | 201.4 | 61.5 |
| 1966 | 197.6 | 59.5 |
| 1965 | 193.7 | 57.5 |
| 1964 | 189.7 | 55.7 |
| 1963 | 185.7 | 53.9 |
| 1962 | 181.9 | 52.1 |
| 1961 | 178.1 | 50.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 77.7% | 81.9% |
| 2023 | 77.5% | 81.6% |
| 2022 | 77.4% | 81.3% |
| 2021 | 77.3% | 81% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 80.7% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 80.4% |
| 2018 | 77% | 80.2% |
| 2017 | 77% | 79.9% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 79.6% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 79.3% |
| 2014 | 76.9% | 79% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 78.7% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 78.4% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 78.1% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 77.8% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 77.5% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 77.2% |
| 2007 | 76.3% | 76.9% |
| 2006 | 76.2% | 76.6% |
| 2005 | 76.1% | 76.3% |
| 2004 | 76% | 76% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 75.7% |
| 2002 | 75.8% | 75.4% |
| 2001 | 75.6% | 75% |
| 2000 | 75.3% | 74.7% |
| 1999 | 75.1% | 74.4% |
| 1998 | 74.9% | 74.2% |
| 1997 | 74.6% | 73.9% |
| 1996 | 74.4% | 73.7% |
| 1995 | 74.3% | 73.4% |
| 1994 | 74.1% | 73% |
| 1993 | 74% | 72.6% |
| 1992 | 73.8% | 72.2% |
| 1991 | 73.7% | 71.8% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 71.4% |
| 1989 | 72.9% | 71% |
| 1988 | 72.4% | 70.5% |
| 1987 | 71.9% | 70% |
| 1986 | 71.4% | 69.5% |
| 1985 | 70.9% | 69% |
| 1984 | 70.4% | 68.4% |
| 1983 | 69.9% | 67.9% |
| 1982 | 69.4% | 67.4% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 66.9% |
| 1980 | 68.1% | 66.3% |
| 1979 | 67.3% | 65.6% |
| 1978 | 66.6% | 64.9% |
| 1977 | 65.8% | 64.2% |
| 1976 | 65% | 63.5% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 62.8% |
| 1974 | 63.4% | 62% |
| 1973 | 62.6% | 61.3% |
| 1972 | 61.8% | 60.5% |
| 1971 | 61% | 59.8% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 59% |
| 1969 | 60.1% | 58.2% |
| 1968 | 59.9% | 57.4% |
| 1967 | 59.7% | 56.6% |
| 1966 | 59.5% | 55.8% |
| 1965 | 59.3% | 54.9% |
| 1964 | 59.2% | 54.1% |
| 1963 | 59% | 53.3% |
| 1962 | 58.8% | 52.4% |
| 1961 | 58.6% | 51.6% |
| 1960 | 58.4% | 50.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba and from 76% to 81.9% in Mexico.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Mexico | 9.21M |
| Tijuana | 1.96M |
| Ecatepec de Morelos | 1.93M |
| Leon | 1.58M |
| Zapopan | 1.48M |
| Guadalajara | 1.46M |
| Puebla | 1.43M |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1.32M |
| Monterrey | 1.14M |
| Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl | 1.07M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons