Cuba has a population density of 274 people per square mile compared to 119.5 people in Lithuania. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 243,376 sq ft in Lithuania. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Cuba and Lithuania are ranked 88th and 142nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.04% of the population and 0.04% of the land area for Lithuania, hence the population density in Cuba is 129.3% higher than in Lithuania.
Population density comparison
Cuba
|
Lithuania
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 274 ppl/mi² | 119.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 88/197 | 142/197 |
| Population |
10937204
|
2858798
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 24,170 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 233,313 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.3% | 31.1% |
| Urban population | 77.7% | 68.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.7% | 0% |
Cuba vs Lithuania:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Cuba increased by 0.15%, compared to a 14.4% decline in Lithuania.
In 2004, Cuba ranked 74th for population density and is in 88th place now. Lithuania was 119th in 2004 and ranks 142nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Lithuania
|
|
| 2024 | 274 | 119.5 |
| 2023 | 275 | 118.8 |
| 2022 | 276 | 117.1 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 116.2 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 116.2 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 116.3 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 116.6 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 117.5 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 119 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 120.3 |
| 2014 | 281 | 121.4 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 122.4 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 123.5 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 125.1 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 128 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 130.7 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 132.2 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 133.5 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 135.1 |
| 2005 | 274 | 137.3 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 139.5 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 141.1 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 142.3 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 143.4 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 144.6 |
| 1999 | 267 | 145.6 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 146.7 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 147.7 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 148.8 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 150 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 151.1 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 152.2 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | 152.9 |
| 1991 | 258.5 | - |
| 1990 | 256.4 | - |
| 1989 | 254 | - |
| 1988 | 251.6 | - |
| 1987 | 249.2 | - |
| 1986 | 247 | - |
| 1985 | 244.9 | - |
| 1984 | 242.9 | - |
| 1983 | 240.9 | - |
| 1982 | 239 | - |
| 1981 | 237.5 | - |
| 1980 | 236.4 | - |
| 1979 | 235.4 | - |
| 1978 | 234.2 | - |
| 1977 | 232.7 | - |
| 1976 | 230.8 | - |
| 1975 | 228.6 | - |
| 1974 | 226.1 | - |
| 1973 | 223.2 | - |
| 1972 | 220 | - |
| 1971 | 216.5 | - |
| 1970 | 212.8 | - |
| 1969 | 209 | - |
| 1968 | 205.2 | - |
| 1967 | 201.4 | - |
| 1966 | 197.6 | - |
| 1965 | 193.7 | - |
| 1964 | 189.7 | - |
| 1963 | 185.7 | - |
| 1962 | 181.9 | - |
| 1961 | 178.1 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Lithuania
|
|
| 2024 | 77.7% | 68.9% |
| 2023 | 77.5% | 68.7% |
| 2022 | 77.4% | 68.5% |
| 2021 | 77.3% | 68.2% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 68% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 67.9% |
| 2018 | 77% | 67.7% |
| 2017 | 77% | 67.5% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 67.4% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 67.2% |
| 2014 | 76.9% | 67.1% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 67% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 66.9% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 66.7% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 66.8% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 66.8% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 66.8% |
| 2007 | 76.3% | 66.8% |
| 2006 | 76.2% | 66.7% |
| 2005 | 76.1% | 66.6% |
| 2004 | 76% | 66.6% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 75.8% | 66.8% |
| 2001 | 75.6% | 66.9% |
| 2000 | 75.3% | 67% |
| 1999 | 75.1% | 67% |
| 1998 | 74.9% | 67.1% |
| 1997 | 74.6% | 67.2% |
| 1996 | 74.4% | 67.2% |
| 1995 | 74.3% | 67.3% |
| 1994 | 74.1% | 67.3% |
| 1993 | 74% | 67.4% |
| 1992 | 73.8% | 67.5% |
| 1991 | 73.7% | 67.5% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 67.6% |
| 1989 | 72.9% | 67.6% |
| 1988 | 72.4% | 67.3% |
| 1987 | 71.9% | 66.5% |
| 1986 | 71.4% | 65.8% |
| 1985 | 70.9% | 65% |
| 1984 | 70.4% | 64.3% |
| 1983 | 69.9% | 63.5% |
| 1982 | 69.4% | 62.7% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 61.9% |
| 1980 | 68.1% | 61.2% |
| 1979 | 67.3% | 60.4% |
| 1978 | 66.6% | 59.3% |
| 1977 | 65.8% | 58.1% |
| 1976 | 65% | 56.9% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 55.7% |
| 1974 | 63.4% | 54.5% |
| 1973 | 62.6% | 53.2% |
| 1972 | 61.8% | 52% |
| 1971 | 61% | 50.7% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 49.6% |
| 1969 | 60.1% | 48.5% |
| 1968 | 59.9% | 47.5% |
| 1967 | 59.7% | 46.5% |
| 1966 | 59.5% | 45.5% |
| 1965 | 59.3% | 44.5% |
| 1964 | 59.2% | 43.4% |
| 1963 | 59% | 42.4% |
| 1962 | 58.8% | 41.4% |
| 1961 | 58.6% | 40.4% |
| 1960 | 58.4% | 39.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba and from 66.6% to 68.9% in Lithuania.
Densely populated cities
|
Cuba
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
