Cuba has a population density of 274 people per square mile compared to 1,006 people in the Philippines. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 31,912 sq ft in the Philippines. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Cuba and the Philippines are ranked 88th and 24th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 1.42% of the population and 0.2% of the land area for the Philippines, hence the population density in Cuba is 72.8% lower than in the Philippines.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 274 ppl/mi² | 1,006 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 88/197 | 24/197 |
| Population |
10937204
|
117540050
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 115,124 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 27,705 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.3% | 51.4% |
| Urban population | 77.7% | 48.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.7% | 7.12% |
Cuba vs the Philippines:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Cuba increased by 0.15%, compared to a 34.1% growth in the Philippines.
In 2004, Cuba ranked 74th for population density and is in 88th place now. The Philippines was 28th in 2004 and ranks 24th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 274 | 1,006 |
| 2023 | 275 | 998 |
| 2022 | 276 | 990 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 982 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 974 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 962 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 951 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 939 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 927 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 915 |
| 2014 | 281 | 901 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 887 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 870 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 853 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 837 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 820 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 805 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 791 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 778 |
| 2005 | 274 | 765 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 750 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 736 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 722 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 707 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 692 |
| 1999 | 267 | 675 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 658 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 642 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 627 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 613 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 600 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 587 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | 573 |
| 1991 | 258.5 | 559 |
| 1990 | 256.4 | 546 |
| 1989 | 254 | 532 |
| 1988 | 251.6 | 519 |
| 1987 | 249.2 | 505 |
| 1986 | 247 | 492 |
| 1985 | 244.9 | 480 |
| 1984 | 242.9 | 467 |
| 1983 | 240.9 | 453 |
| 1982 | 239 | 440 |
| 1981 | 237.5 | 428 |
| 1980 | 236.4 | 417 |
| 1979 | 235.4 | 407 |
| 1978 | 234.2 | 396 |
| 1977 | 232.7 | 385 |
| 1976 | 230.8 | 375 |
| 1975 | 228.6 | 366 |
| 1974 | 226.1 | 358 |
| 1973 | 223.2 | 350 |
| 1972 | 220 | 342 |
| 1971 | 216.5 | 334 |
| 1970 | 212.8 | 327 |
| 1969 | 209 | 318 |
| 1968 | 205.2 | 309 |
| 1967 | 201.4 | 301 |
| 1966 | 197.6 | 291.9 |
| 1965 | 193.7 | 283.3 |
| 1964 | 189.7 | 274.8 |
| 1963 | 185.7 | 266.4 |
| 1962 | 181.9 | 258.1 |
| 1961 | 178.1 | 250 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 77.7% | 48.6% |
| 2023 | 77.5% | 48.3% |
| 2022 | 77.4% | 48% |
| 2021 | 77.3% | 47.7% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 47.4% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 47.1% |
| 2018 | 77% | 46.9% |
| 2017 | 77% | 46.7% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 46.5% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 46.3% |
| 2014 | 76.9% | 46.1% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 45.9% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 45.7% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 45.5% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 45.3% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 45.4% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 45.5% |
| 2007 | 76.3% | 45.5% |
| 2006 | 76.2% | 45.6% |
| 2005 | 76.1% | 45.7% |
| 2004 | 76% | 45.8% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 45.9% |
| 2002 | 75.8% | 46% |
| 2001 | 75.6% | 46% |
| 2000 | 75.3% | 46.1% |
| 1999 | 75.1% | 46.2% |
| 1998 | 74.9% | 46.3% |
| 1997 | 74.6% | 46.4% |
| 1996 | 74.4% | 46.5% |
| 1995 | 74.3% | 46.6% |
| 1994 | 74.1% | 46.6% |
| 1993 | 74% | 46.7% |
| 1992 | 73.8% | 46.8% |
| 1991 | 73.7% | 46.9% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 47% |
| 1989 | 72.9% | 46.2% |
| 1988 | 72.4% | 45.2% |
| 1987 | 71.9% | 44.2% |
| 1986 | 71.4% | 43.2% |
| 1985 | 70.9% | 42.2% |
| 1984 | 70.4% | 41.3% |
| 1983 | 69.9% | 40.3% |
| 1982 | 69.4% | 39.3% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 38.4% |
| 1980 | 68.1% | 37.5% |
| 1979 | 67.3% | 37% |
| 1978 | 66.6% | 36.6% |
| 1977 | 65.8% | 36.3% |
| 1976 | 65% | 35.9% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 35.6% |
| 1974 | 63.4% | 35.1% |
| 1973 | 62.6% | 34.5% |
| 1972 | 61.8% | 34% |
| 1971 | 61% | 33.5% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 33% |
| 1969 | 60.1% | 32.7% |
| 1968 | 59.9% | 32.4% |
| 1967 | 59.7% | 32.1% |
| 1966 | 59.5% | 31.9% |
| 1965 | 59.3% | 31.6% |
| 1964 | 59.2% | 31.3% |
| 1963 | 59% | 31.1% |
| 1962 | 58.8% | 30.8% |
| 1961 | 58.6% | 30.6% |
| 1960 | 58.4% | 30.3% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba and from 45.8% to 48.6% in the Philippines.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons