Cuba has a population density of 274 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Cuba has 107,724 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Cuba and Sweden are ranked 88th and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Cuba has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Cuba is 308% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
Cuba
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 274 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 88/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
10937204
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 40,077 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 101,759 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 22.3% | 11% |
| Urban population | 77.7% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 22.7% | 0% |
Cuba vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Cuba increased by 0.15%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Cuba ranked 74th for population density and is in 88th place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 274 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 275 | 67 |
| 2022 | 276 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 277.5 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 278.9 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 279.5 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 280.1 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 280.7 | 64 |
| 2016 | 280.4 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 280.5 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 281 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 280.8 | 61 |
| 2012 | 274.5 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 273.9 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 274.9 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 274.8 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 274.8 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 274.7 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 274.5 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 274 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 273.5 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 272.9 | 57 |
| 2002 | 272.1 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 268.7 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 267.9 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 267 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 266.1 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 265.2 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 264.4 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 263.5 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 262.5 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 261.4 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 260.1 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 258.5 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 256.4 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 254 | 54 |
| 1988 | 251.6 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 249.2 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 247 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 244.9 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 242.9 | 53 |
| 1983 | 240.9 | 53 |
| 1982 | 239 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 237.5 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 236.4 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 235.4 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 234.2 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 232.7 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 230.8 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 228.6 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 226.1 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 223.2 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 220 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 216.5 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 212.8 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 209 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 205.2 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 201.4 | 50 |
| 1966 | 197.6 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 193.7 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 189.7 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 185.7 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 181.9 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 178.1 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Cuba
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 77.7% | 89% |
| 2023 | 77.5% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 77.4% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 77.3% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 88% |
| 2019 | 77.1% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 77% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 77% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 76.9% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 76.9% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 76.9% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 76.8% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 76.8% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 76.7% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 76.5% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 76.4% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 76.3% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 76.2% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 76.1% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 76% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 75.9% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 75.8% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 75.6% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 75.3% | 84% |
| 1999 | 75.1% | 84% |
| 1998 | 74.9% | 84% |
| 1997 | 74.6% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 74.4% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 74.3% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 74.1% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 74% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 73.8% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 73.7% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 72.9% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 72.4% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 71.9% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 71.4% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 70.9% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 70.4% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 69.9% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 69.4% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 68.9% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 68.1% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 67.3% | 83% |
| 1978 | 66.6% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 65.8% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 65% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 64.2% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 63.4% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 62.6% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 61.8% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 61% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 60.3% | 81% |
| 1969 | 60.1% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 59.9% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 59.7% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 59.5% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 59.3% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 59.2% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 59% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 58.8% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 58.6% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 58.4% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 76% to 77.7% in Cuba and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
Cuba
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Havana | 2.49M |
| Santiago de Cuba | 445K |
| Holguin | 350K |
| Camaguey | 322K |
| Santa Clara | 247K |
| Bayamo | 235K |
| Guantanamo | 228K |
| Las Tunas | 202K |
| Pinar del Rio | 189K |
| Cienfuegos | 165K |
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
