Nigeria has a population density of 662 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Nigeria has 42,734 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Nigeria and Sweden are ranked 43rd and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Nigeria has 2.86% of the world's population and 0.61% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Nigeria is 884% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 662 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 43/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
241467099
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 351,650 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 42,133 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 45% | 11% |
| Urban population | 55% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 14.5% | 0% |
Nigeria vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Nigeria increased by 65%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Nigeria ranked 53rd for population density and is in 43rd place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 662 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 648 | 67 |
| 2022 | 635 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 621 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 609 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 596 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 583 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 569 | 64 |
| 2016 | 556 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 542 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 529 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 515 | 61 |
| 2012 | 501 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 487 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 474 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 461 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 448 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 436 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 424 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 412 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 401 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 390 | 57 |
| 2002 | 380 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 369 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 359 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 350 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 341 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 332 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 323 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 315 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 307 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 298.9 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 291.1 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 283.6 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 276.2 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 268.8 | 54 |
| 1988 | 261.7 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 254.8 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 248.1 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 241.4 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 234.7 | 53 |
| 1983 | 228.7 | 53 |
| 1982 | 222.9 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 216.3 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 209.8 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 203.3 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 197.1 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 191.2 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 185.6 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 180.3 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 175.4 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 170.9 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 166.6 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 162.7 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 158.9 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 155.4 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 151.9 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 148.7 | 50 |
| 1966 | 145.6 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 142.4 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 139.4 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 136.4 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 133.6 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 130.8 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 55% | 89% |
| 2023 | 54.3% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 53.5% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 52.7% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 52% | 88% |
| 2019 | 51.2% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 50.3% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 49.5% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 48.7% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 47.8% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 47% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 46.1% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 45.2% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 44.4% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 43.5% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 42.6% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 41.7% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 40.8% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 39.9% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 39.1% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 38.2% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 37.4% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 36.5% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 35.7% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 34.8% | 84% |
| 1999 | 34.3% | 84% |
| 1998 | 33.8% | 84% |
| 1997 | 33.2% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 32.7% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 32.2% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 31.7% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 31.2% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 30.7% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 30.2% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 29.7% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 28.8% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 28% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 27.2% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 26.4% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 25.6% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 24.9% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 24.1% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 23.4% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 22.7% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 22% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 21.5% | 83% |
| 1978 | 21.1% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 20.6% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 20.2% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 19.8% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 19.4% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 19% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 18.5% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 18.2% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 17.8% | 81% |
| 1969 | 17.5% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 17.3% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 17% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 16.8% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 16.6% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 16.3% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 16.1% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 15.9% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 15.6% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 15.4% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 38.2% to 55% in Nigeria and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Lagos | 15.1M |
| Kano | 4.35M |
| Port Harcourt | 3.32M |
| Ibadan | 2.55M |
| Benin | 1.78M |
| Abuja | 1.69M |
| Onitsha | 1.48M |
| Maiduguri | 1.2M |
| Aba | 1.16M |
| Enugu | 1.03M |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons