Bangladesh has a population density of 3,458 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Bangladesh has 9,152 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Bangladesh and Sweden are ranked 7th and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Bangladesh has 2.13% of the world's population and 0.09% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Bangladesh is 5,045% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 3,458 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 7/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
177398795
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 50,186 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 8,061 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 58.8% | 11% |
| Urban population | 41.2% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 11.2% | 0% |
Bangladesh vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Bangladesh increased by 21.6%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Bangladesh ranked 6th for population density and is in 7th place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 3,458 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 3,417 | 67 |
| 2022 | 3,368 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 3,336 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 3,309 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 3,281 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 3,254 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 3,227 | 64 |
| 2016 | 3,200 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 3,171 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 3,143 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 3,115 | 61 |
| 2012 | 3,085 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 3,056 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 3,028 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 3,002 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 2,974 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 2,945 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 2,913 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 2,879 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 2,843 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 2,805 | 57 |
| 2002 | 2,764 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 2,722 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 2,677 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 2,629 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 2,579 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 2,531 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 2,484 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 2,439 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 2,394 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 2,350 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 2,307 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 2,264 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 2,221 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 2,177 | 54 |
| 1988 | 2,133 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 2,088 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 2,042 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 1,995 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 1,946 | 53 |
| 1983 | 1,897 | 53 |
| 1982 | 1,847 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 1,797 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 1,751 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 1,710 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 1,669 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 1,629 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 1,589 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 1,549 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 1,509 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 1,467 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 1,425 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 1,398 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 1,374 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 1,339 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 1,301 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 1,264 | 50 |
| 1966 | 1,227 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 1,192 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 1,158 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 1,124 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 1,092 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 1,061 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 41.2% | 89% |
| 2023 | 40.5% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 39.7% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 38.9% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 38.2% | 88% |
| 2019 | 37.4% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 36.6% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 35.9% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 35.1% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 34.3% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 33.5% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 32.8% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 32% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 31.2% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 30.5% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 29.7% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 29% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 28.2% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 27.5% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 26.8% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 26.1% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 25.4% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 24.8% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 24.1% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 23.6% | 84% |
| 1999 | 23.2% | 84% |
| 1998 | 22.8% | 84% |
| 1997 | 22.4% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 22.1% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 21.7% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 21.3% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 21% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 20.6% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 20.3% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 19.8% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 19.3% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 18.9% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 18.4% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 17.9% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 17.5% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 17.1% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 16.6% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 16.2% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 15.8% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 14.9% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 13.7% | 83% |
| 1978 | 12.6% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 11.6% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 10.7% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 9.84% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 9.03% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 8.55% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 8.22% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 7.9% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 7.59% | 81% |
| 1969 | 7.3% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 7.01% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 6.73% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 6.47% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 6.21% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 5.96% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 5.73% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 5.5% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 5.28% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 5.14% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 26.1% to 41.2% in Bangladesh and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Dhaka | 16.8M |
| Chittagong | 2.58M |
| Narayanganj | 968K |
| Khulna | 929K |
| Sylhet | 480K |
| Rajshahi | 448K |
| Bogra | 401K |
| Barisal | 328K |
| Rangpur | 294K |
| Brahmanbaria | 268K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons