Antigua and Barbuda has a population density of 552 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Antigua and Barbuda has 50,540 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Antigua and Barbuda and Sweden are ranked 53rd and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Antigua and Barbuda has 0.001% of the world's population and 0.0003% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Antigua and Barbuda is 721% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 552 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 53/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
94540
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 169.9 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 50,507 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75.7% | 11% |
| Urban population | 24.3% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Antigua and Barbuda vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Antigua and Barbuda increased by 19.1%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Antigua and Barbuda ranked 47th for population density and is in 53rd place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 552 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 549 | 67 |
| 2022 | 546 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 544 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 541 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 538 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 535 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 533 | 64 |
| 2016 | 530 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 526 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 523 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 518 | 61 |
| 2012 | 514 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 508 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 502 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 495 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 488 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 481 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 474 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 469 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 463 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 458 | 57 |
| 2002 | 453 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 448 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 441 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 434 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 426 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 418 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 410 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 401 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 393 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 386 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 379 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 373 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 371 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 373 | 54 |
| 1988 | 375 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 376 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 378 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 380 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 382 | 53 |
| 1983 | 382 | 53 |
| 1982 | 381 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 381 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 380 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 378 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 377 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 376 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 375 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 376 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 377 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 379 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 380 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 381 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 380 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 376 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 370 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 364 | 50 |
| 1966 | 358 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 353 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 347 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 342 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 337 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 333 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 24.3% | 89% |
| 2023 | 24.3% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 24.3% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 24.4% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 24.4% | 88% |
| 2019 | 24.5% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 24.6% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 24.7% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 24.8% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 25% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 25.2% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 25.3% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 25.5% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 25.7% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 26.2% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 26.8% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 27.4% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 28% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 28.6% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 29.2% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 30.5% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 31.1% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 31.7% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 32.1% | 84% |
| 1999 | 32.5% | 84% |
| 1998 | 32.9% | 84% |
| 1997 | 33.2% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 33.6% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 34% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 34.3% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 34.7% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 35.1% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 35.5% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 35.4% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 35.3% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 35.3% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 35.2% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 35.1% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 35% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 34.9% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 34.9% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 34.8% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 34.7% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 34.6% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 34.5% | 83% |
| 1978 | 34.5% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 34.4% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 34.3% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 34.2% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 34.1% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 34.1% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 34% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 33.9% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 33.8% | 81% |
| 1969 | 34.2% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 34.8% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 35.4% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 36% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 36.6% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 37.2% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 37.8% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 38.4% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 39% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 39.7% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 24.3% in Antigua and Barbuda and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons