Malaysia has a population density of 280.3 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Malaysia has 100,140 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Malaysia and Sweden are ranked 85th and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malaysia has 0.44% of the world's population and 0.22% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Malaysia is 317% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 280.3 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 85/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
36304998
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 126,854 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 99,458 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 20.8% | 11% |
| Urban population | 79.2% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 5.57% | 0% |
Malaysia vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Malaysia increased by 40.8%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Malaysia ranked 93rd for population density and is in 85th place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 280.3 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 276.9 | 67 |
| 2022 | 273.5 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 270.3 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 267.2 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 263.6 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 259.4 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 255.1 | 64 |
| 2016 | 250.6 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 246.2 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 242 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 237.9 | 61 |
| 2012 | 233.8 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 229.9 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 225.9 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 221.7 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 217.3 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 212.8 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 208.3 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 203.7 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 199.1 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 194.6 | 57 |
| 2002 | 190 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 185.5 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 181.1 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 176.9 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 172.7 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 168.5 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 164.4 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 160.3 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 156.2 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 152.3 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 148.5 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 144.6 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 140.6 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 136.5 | 54 |
| 1988 | 132.4 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 128.3 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 124.2 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 120.2 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 116.3 | 53 |
| 1983 | 112.6 | 53 |
| 1982 | 109 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 105.6 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 102.3 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 99.5 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 97.2 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 94.9 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 92.6 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 90.4 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 88.3 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 86.2 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 84.2 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 82.2 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 80.2 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 78.4 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 76.7 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 74.9 | 50 |
| 1966 | 73.2 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 71.4 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 69.6 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 67.8 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 66.1 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 64.4 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 79.2% | 89% |
| 2023 | 78.7% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 78.2% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 77.7% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 88% |
| 2019 | 76.6% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 76% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 75.4% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 74.8% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 74.2% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 73.6% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 72.9% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 72.3% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 71.6% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 70.9% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 70.1% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 69.2% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 68.4% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 67.5% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 66.6% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 65.7% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 64.8% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 63.9% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 62.9% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 62% | 84% |
| 1999 | 60.7% | 84% |
| 1998 | 59.5% | 84% |
| 1997 | 58.2% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 57% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 55.7% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 54.4% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 53.1% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 50.6% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 49.8% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 49% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 47.5% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 46.7% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 45.9% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 45.1% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 43.6% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 42.8% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 42% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 41.2% | 83% |
| 1978 | 40.3% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 39.4% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 38.5% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 37.7% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 35.9% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 35.1% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 34.3% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 33.5% | 81% |
| 1969 | 32.7% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 32% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 31.3% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 30.6% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 29.9% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 29.2% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 28.6% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 27.9% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 27.2% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 26.6% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 65.7% to 79.2% in Malaysia and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kuala Lumpur | 1.98M |
| Klang | 878K |
| Ipoh | 867K |
| Johor Bahru | 798K |
| George Town | 794K |
| Shah Alam | 741K |
| Subang Jaya | 708K |
| Petaling Jaya | 639K |
| Kuantan | 608K |
| Sungai Petani | 545K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons