Laos has a population density of 87.2 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Laos has 328,051 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Laos and Sweden are ranked 150th and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Laos has 0.1% of the world's population and 0.15% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Laos is 29.7% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
Laos
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 87.2 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 150/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
7954155
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 89,112 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 319,739 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 61.1% | 11% |
| Urban population | 38.9% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Laos vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Laos increased by 34.4%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Laos ranked 150th for population density and is in 150th place still. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Laos
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 87.2 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 86 | 67 |
| 2022 | 84.8 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 83.6 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 82.4 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 81.2 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 80 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 78.8 | 64 |
| 2016 | 77.5 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 76.3 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 75.2 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 74.2 | 61 |
| 2012 | 73.2 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 72.1 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 71.1 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 70 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 69 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 68 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 66.9 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 65.9 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 64.9 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 63.9 | 57 |
| 2002 | 63 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 62 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 60.9 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 59.9 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 58.9 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 57.8 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 56.6 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 55.3 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 54 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 52.6 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 51.2 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 49.8 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 48.4 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 47 | 54 |
| 1988 | 45.7 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 44.4 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 43.2 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 42 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 40.8 | 53 |
| 1983 | 39.7 | 53 |
| 1982 | 38.7 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 37.8 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 36.9 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 36.2 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 35.6 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 35 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 34.4 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 33.7 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 33 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 32.2 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 31.4 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 30.7 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 30 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 29.3 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 28.6 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 27.9 | 50 |
| 1966 | 27.3 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 26.7 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 26.1 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 25.5 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 24.9 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 24.3 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Laos
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 38.9% | 89% |
| 2023 | 38.2% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 37.6% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 36.9% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 36.3% | 88% |
| 2019 | 35.6% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 35% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 34.4% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 33.7% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 33.1% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 32.5% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 31.9% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 31.3% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 30.7% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 30.1% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 29.5% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 28.9% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 28.3% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 27.7% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 27.2% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 26.2% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 25.1% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 24% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 23% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 22% | 84% |
| 1999 | 21% | 84% |
| 1998 | 20% | 84% |
| 1997 | 19.1% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 18.2% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 17.4% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 16.9% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 16.5% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 16.1% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 15.8% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 15.4% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 15.1% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 14.8% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 14.4% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 14.1% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 13.8% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 13.5% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 13.2% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 12.9% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 12.7% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 12.4% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 12.1% | 83% |
| 1978 | 11.8% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 11.6% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 11.3% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 11.1% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 10.8% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 10.6% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 10.3% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 9.95% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 9.63% | 81% |
| 1969 | 9.3% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 8.99% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 8.69% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 8.4% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 8.32% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 8.25% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 8.17% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 8.1% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 8.02% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 7.95% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 26.2% to 38.9% in Laos and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
Laos
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Vientiane | 948K |
| Thakhek | 90.8K |
| Luang Prabang | 53.8K |
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
