Sweden has a population density of 67.2 people per square mile compared to 204.7 people in Tunisia. Sweden has 455,646 sq ft of land per person vs 143,444 sq ft in Tunisia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sweden and Tunisia are ranked 163rd and 108th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sweden has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.27% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Tunisia, hence the population density in Sweden is 67.2% lower than in Tunisia.
Population density comparison
Sweden
|
Tunisia
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 67.2 ppl/mi² | 204.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 163/197 | 108/197 |
| Population |
10654722
|
12402051
|
| Land area | 157,248 sq mi | 59,985 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 414,753 sq ft | 136,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 29.1% |
| Urban population | 89% | 70.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sweden vs Tunisia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sweden increased by 17.5%, compared to a 20.8% growth in Tunisia.
In 2004, Sweden ranked 151st for population density and is in 163rd place now. Tunisia was 105th in 2004 and ranks 108th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sweden
|
Tunisia
|
|
| 2024 | 67.2 | 204.7 |
| 2023 | 67 | 203.4 |
| 2022 | 66.7 | 202 |
| 2021 | 66.2 | 200.9 |
| 2020 | 65.8 | 199.6 |
| 2019 | 65.4 | 198 |
| 2018 | 64.7 | 196.1 |
| 2017 | 64 | 194.2 |
| 2016 | 63.1 | 192.2 |
| 2015 | 62.3 | 190.1 |
| 2014 | 61.7 | 188 |
| 2013 | 61 | 185.7 |
| 2012 | 60.5 | 183.5 |
| 2011 | 60.1 | 181.5 |
| 2010 | 59.6 | 179.5 |
| 2009 | 59.1 | 177.6 |
| 2008 | 58.6 | 175.8 |
| 2007 | 58.2 | 174.1 |
| 2006 | 57.7 | 172.5 |
| 2005 | 57.4 | 171 |
| 2004 | 57.2 | 169.5 |
| 2003 | 57 | 167.9 |
| 2002 | 56.7 | 166.2 |
| 2001 | 56.6 | 164.5 |
| 2000 | 56.4 | 162.8 |
| 1999 | 56.3 | 161 |
| 1998 | 56.3 | 159.1 |
| 1997 | 56.2 | 157.1 |
| 1996 | 56.2 | 154.9 |
| 1995 | 56.1 | 152.7 |
| 1994 | 55.8 | 150.3 |
| 1993 | 55.4 | 147.7 |
| 1992 | 55.1 | 144.7 |
| 1991 | 54.8 | 141.7 |
| 1990 | 54.4 | 138.8 |
| 1989 | 54 | 135.9 |
| 1988 | 53.6 | 132.9 |
| 1987 | 53.4 | 129.9 |
| 1986 | 53.2 | 126.7 |
| 1985 | 53.1 | 123.5 |
| 1984 | 53 | 120.4 |
| 1983 | 53 | 117.6 |
| 1982 | 52.9 | 115.2 |
| 1981 | 52.9 | 112.7 |
| 1980 | 52.8 | 110.1 |
| 1979 | 52.7 | 107.6 |
| 1978 | 52.6 | 105.2 |
| 1977 | 52.5 | 102.6 |
| 1976 | 52.3 | 100 |
| 1975 | 52.1 | 97.3 |
| 1974 | 51.9 | 94.8 |
| 1973 | 51.7 | 92.3 |
| 1972 | 51.6 | 90 |
| 1971 | 51.5 | 87.7 |
| 1970 | 51.1 | 85.5 |
| 1969 | 50.7 | 83.4 |
| 1968 | 50.3 | 81.4 |
| 1967 | 50 | 79.4 |
| 1966 | 49.6 | 77.6 |
| 1965 | 49.2 | 76 |
| 1964 | 48.7 | 74.9 |
| 1963 | 48.4 | 73.8 |
| 1962 | 48.1 | 72.8 |
| 1961 | 47.8 | 72 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sweden
|
Tunisia
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 70.9% |
| 2023 | 88.7% | 70.5% |
| 2022 | 88.5% | 70.2% |
| 2021 | 88.2% | 69.9% |
| 2020 | 88% | 69.6% |
| 2019 | 87.7% | 69.3% |
| 2018 | 87.4% | 68.9% |
| 2017 | 87.1% | 68.6% |
| 2016 | 86.9% | 68.3% |
| 2015 | 86.6% | 68.1% |
| 2014 | 86.2% | 67.8% |
| 2013 | 85.9% | 67.5% |
| 2012 | 85.6% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 66.9% |
| 2010 | 85.1% | 66.7% |
| 2009 | 84.9% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 84.7% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | 84.6% | 65.8% |
| 2006 | 84.4% | 65.5% |
| 2005 | 84.3% | 65.2% |
| 2004 | 84.3% | 65% |
| 2003 | 84.2% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 84.1% | 64.2% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 63.8% |
| 2000 | 84% | 63.4% |
| 1999 | 84% | 63% |
| 1998 | 84% | 62.7% |
| 1997 | 83.9% | 62.3% |
| 1996 | 83.9% | 61.9% |
| 1995 | 83.8% | 61.5% |
| 1994 | 83.7% | 61.1% |
| 1993 | 83.5% | 60.4% |
| 1992 | 83.4% | 59.6% |
| 1991 | 83.2% | 58.8% |
| 1990 | 83.1% | 57.9% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 83.1% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 83.1% | 55.5% |
| 1986 | 83.1% | 54.7% |
| 1985 | 83.1% | 53.8% |
| 1984 | 83.1% | 53% |
| 1983 | 83.1% | 52.4% |
| 1982 | 83.1% | 51.8% |
| 1981 | 83.1% | 51.2% |
| 1980 | 83.1% | 50.6% |
| 1979 | 83% | 50% |
| 1978 | 82.9% | 49.4% |
| 1977 | 82.9% | 48.8% |
| 1976 | 82.8% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 82.7% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 82.5% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 82.2% | 46% |
| 1972 | 81.9% | 45.1% |
| 1971 | 81.6% | 44.3% |
| 1970 | 81% | 43.5% |
| 1969 | 80.3% | 42.7% |
| 1968 | 79.5% | 41.8% |
| 1967 | 78.7% | 41% |
| 1966 | 77.9% | 40.2% |
| 1965 | 77.1% | 39.7% |
| 1964 | 76.2% | 39.3% |
| 1963 | 75.2% | 38.8% |
| 1962 | 74.3% | 38.4% |
| 1961 | 73.3% | 38% |
| 1960 | 72.5% | 37.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden and from 65% to 70.9% in Tunisia.
Densely populated cities
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
