Croatia has a population density of 178.9 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Croatia has 157,560 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Croatia and Sweden are ranked 121st and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Croatia has 0.05% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Croatia is 166.2% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 178.9 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 121/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
3839202
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 21,606 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 155,795 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.1% | 11% |
| Urban population | 58.9% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Croatia vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Croatia decreased by 10.2%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Croatia ranked 92nd for population density and is in 121st place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 178.9 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 178.6 | 67 |
| 2022 | 178.5 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 179.5 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 181.2 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 182.8 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 184.6 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 187 | 64 |
| 2016 | 190.1 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 192.1 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 194.4 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 195.9 | 61 |
| 2012 | 197.2 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 198.1 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 198.8 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 199.2 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 199.5 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 199.5 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 199.5 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 199.5 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 199.2 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 199.2 | 57 |
| 2002 | 199.3 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 199.2 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 207 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 209 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 209.9 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 209.8 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 210.8 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 214 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 215.5 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 213.1 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 212 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | - | 54.8 |
| 1990 | - | 54.4 |
| 1989 | - | 54 |
| 1988 | - | 53.6 |
| 1987 | - | 53.4 |
| 1986 | - | 53.2 |
| 1985 | - | 53.1 |
| 1984 | - | 53 |
| 1983 | - | 53 |
| 1982 | - | 52.9 |
| 1981 | - | 52.9 |
| 1980 | - | 52.8 |
| 1979 | - | 52.7 |
| 1978 | - | 52.6 |
| 1977 | - | 52.5 |
| 1976 | - | 52.3 |
| 1975 | - | 52.1 |
| 1974 | - | 51.9 |
| 1973 | - | 51.7 |
| 1972 | - | 51.6 |
| 1971 | - | 51.5 |
| 1970 | - | 51.1 |
| 1969 | - | 50.7 |
| 1968 | - | 50.3 |
| 1967 | - | 50 |
| 1966 | - | 49.6 |
| 1965 | - | 49.2 |
| 1964 | - | 48.7 |
| 1963 | - | 48.4 |
| 1962 | - | 48.1 |
| 1961 | - | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 58.9% | 89% |
| 2023 | 58.6% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 58.2% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 57.9% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 57.6% | 88% |
| 2019 | 57.2% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 56.9% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 56.7% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 56.4% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 56.2% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 55.9% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 55.7% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 55.5% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 55.3% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 55.2% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 55% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 54.8% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 54.7% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 54.5% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 54.3% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 54.1% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 54% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 53.8% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 53.6% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 53.4% | 84% |
| 1999 | 53.2% | 84% |
| 1998 | 53% | 84% |
| 1997 | 52.7% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 52.5% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 52.3% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 52% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 51.8% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 51.6% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 51.4% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 51% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 50.7% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 50.3% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 50% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 49.6% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 49.3% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 48.9% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 48.6% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 48.2% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 47.9% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 47.3% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 46.6% | 83% |
| 1978 | 45.9% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 45.2% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 44.5% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 43.9% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 43.2% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 42.5% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 41.8% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 41.2% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 40.2% | 81% |
| 1969 | 39.1% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 38.1% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 37% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 36% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 35% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 34% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 33% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 32% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 31% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 30.2% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 54.1% to 58.9% in Croatia and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Zagreb | 767K |
| Split | 161K |
| Rijeka | 108K |
| Osijek | 96.3K |
| Zadar | 70.8K |
| Velika Gorica | 61.1K |
| Pula | 52.2K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons