Kazakhstan has a population density of 19.8 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Kazakhstan has 1,424,328 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Kazakhstan and Sweden are ranked 187th and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Kazakhstan has 0.25% of the world's population and 1.81% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Kazakhstan is 70.6% lower than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
Kazakhstan
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 19.8 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 187/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
21036432
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 1,042,360 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,411,156 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.6% | 11% |
| Urban population | 58.4% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.8% | 0% |
Kazakhstan vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Kazakhstan increased by 29.9%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Kazakhstan ranked 181st for population density and is in 187th place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Kazakhstan
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 19.8 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 19.5 | 67 |
| 2022 | 19.2 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 18.9 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 18.7 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 18.4 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 18.2 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 17.9 | 64 |
| 2016 | 17.6 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 17.3 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 17.1 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 16.8 | 61 |
| 2012 | 16.6 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 16.4 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 16.2 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 15.9 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 15.8 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 15.6 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 15.4 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 15.3 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 15.2 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 15.1 | 57 |
| 2002 | 15 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 14.9 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 14.9 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 14.8 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 15 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 15.4 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 15.7 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 16.1 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 16.4 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 16.6 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 16.6 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | - | 54.8 |
| 1990 | - | 54.4 |
| 1989 | - | 54 |
| 1988 | - | 53.6 |
| 1987 | - | 53.4 |
| 1986 | - | 53.2 |
| 1985 | - | 53.1 |
| 1984 | - | 53 |
| 1983 | - | 53 |
| 1982 | - | 52.9 |
| 1981 | - | 52.9 |
| 1980 | - | 52.8 |
| 1979 | - | 52.7 |
| 1978 | - | 52.6 |
| 1977 | - | 52.5 |
| 1976 | - | 52.3 |
| 1975 | - | 52.1 |
| 1974 | - | 51.9 |
| 1973 | - | 51.7 |
| 1972 | - | 51.6 |
| 1971 | - | 51.5 |
| 1970 | - | 51.1 |
| 1969 | - | 50.7 |
| 1968 | - | 50.3 |
| 1967 | - | 50 |
| 1966 | - | 49.6 |
| 1965 | - | 49.2 |
| 1964 | - | 48.7 |
| 1963 | - | 48.4 |
| 1962 | - | 48.1 |
| 1961 | - | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Kazakhstan
|
Sweden
|
|
| 2024 | 58.4% | 89% |
| 2023 | 58.2% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 58% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 57.8% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 57.7% | 88% |
| 2019 | 57.5% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 57.4% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 57.3% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 57.3% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 57.2% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 57.1% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 57% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 57% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 56.9% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 56.8% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 56.8% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 56.7% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 56.6% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 56.5% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 56.5% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 56.4% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 56.2% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 56.2% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 56.1% | 84% |
| 1999 | 56% | 84% |
| 1998 | 56% | 84% |
| 1997 | 56% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 55.9% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 55.9% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 55.9% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 56% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 56.1% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 56.2% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 56.3% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 56.4% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 56.3% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 56.2% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 56.1% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 56% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 55.9% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 55.5% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 55% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 54.6% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 54.1% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 53.7% | 83% |
| 1978 | 53.4% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 53.1% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 52.8% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 52.6% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 52.3% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 51.8% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 51.3% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 50.8% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 50.2% | 81% |
| 1969 | 49.6% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 49% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 48.3% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 47.7% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 47% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 46.4% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 45.8% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 45.3% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 44.7% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 44.2% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Almaty | 2.23M |
| Shymkent | 1.19M |
| Nur-Sultan | 1.08M |
| Karaganda | 516K |
| Taraz | 418K |
| Aktobe | 388K |
| Semey | 350K |
| Pavlodar | 333K |
| Oskemen | 333K |
| Atyrau | 295K |
|
Sweden
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
