Morocco has a population density of 221 people per square mile compared to 67.2 people in Sweden. Morocco has 126,220 sq ft of land per person vs 455,646 sq ft in Sweden. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Morocco and Sweden are ranked 103rd and 163rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Morocco has 0.47% of the world's population and 0.3% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.13% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Sweden, hence the population density in Morocco is 228.8% higher than in Sweden.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 221 ppl/mi² | 67.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 103/197 | 163/197 |
| Population |
38697192
|
10654722
|
| Land area | 172,317 sq mi | 157,248 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 126,150 sq ft | 414,753 sq ft |
| Rural population | 34.4% | 11% |
| Urban population | 65.6% | 89% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 17.3% | 0% |
Morocco vs Sweden:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Morocco increased by 27.1%, compared to a 17.5% growth in Sweden.
In 2004, Morocco ranked 100th for population density and is in 103rd place now. Sweden was 151st in 2004 and ranks 163rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 221 | 67.2 |
| 2023 | 218.9 | 67 |
| 2022 | 216.6 | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 214.5 | 66.2 |
| 2020 | 212.3 | 65.8 |
| 2019 | 210.1 | 65.4 |
| 2018 | 208 | 64.7 |
| 2017 | 205.7 | 64 |
| 2016 | 203.2 | 63.1 |
| 2015 | 200.8 | 62.3 |
| 2014 | 198.5 | 61.7 |
| 2013 | 196.1 | 61 |
| 2012 | 193.6 | 60.5 |
| 2011 | 191 | 60.1 |
| 2010 | 188.4 | 59.6 |
| 2009 | 185.9 | 59.1 |
| 2008 | 183.4 | 58.6 |
| 2007 | 181 | 58.2 |
| 2006 | 178.6 | 57.7 |
| 2005 | 176.2 | 57.4 |
| 2004 | 173.8 | 57.2 |
| 2003 | 171.6 | 57 |
| 2002 | 169.4 | 56.7 |
| 2001 | 167.2 | 56.6 |
| 2000 | 164.9 | 56.4 |
| 1999 | 162.6 | 56.3 |
| 1998 | 160.3 | 56.3 |
| 1997 | 157.9 | 56.2 |
| 1996 | 155.6 | 56.2 |
| 1995 | 153.2 | 56.1 |
| 1994 | 150.9 | 55.8 |
| 1993 | 148.6 | 55.4 |
| 1992 | 146.3 | 55.1 |
| 1991 | 143.9 | 54.8 |
| 1990 | 141.5 | 54.4 |
| 1989 | 138.9 | 54 |
| 1988 | 136.4 | 53.6 |
| 1987 | 133.8 | 53.4 |
| 1986 | 131.2 | 53.2 |
| 1985 | 128.3 | 53.1 |
| 1984 | 125.3 | 53 |
| 1983 | 122.2 | 53 |
| 1982 | 119.1 | 52.9 |
| 1981 | 116 | 52.9 |
| 1980 | 112.9 | 52.8 |
| 1979 | 110 | 52.7 |
| 1978 | 107.2 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 104.5 | 52.5 |
| 1976 | 102 | 52.3 |
| 1975 | 99.5 | 52.1 |
| 1974 | 97.1 | 51.9 |
| 1973 | 94.7 | 51.7 |
| 1972 | 92.4 | 51.6 |
| 1971 | 90.1 | 51.5 |
| 1970 | 87.8 | 51.1 |
| 1969 | 85.5 | 50.7 |
| 1968 | 83.3 | 50.3 |
| 1967 | 81.1 | 50 |
| 1966 | 78.9 | 49.6 |
| 1965 | 76.8 | 49.2 |
| 1964 | 74.8 | 48.7 |
| 1963 | 73 | 48.4 |
| 1962 | 71.1 | 48.1 |
| 1961 | 69.2 | 47.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65.6% | 89% |
| 2023 | 65.1% | 88.7% |
| 2022 | 64.6% | 88.5% |
| 2021 | 64.1% | 88.2% |
| 2020 | 63.5% | 88% |
| 2019 | 63% | 87.7% |
| 2018 | 62.5% | 87.4% |
| 2017 | 61.9% | 87.1% |
| 2016 | 61.4% | 86.9% |
| 2015 | 60.8% | 86.6% |
| 2014 | 60.3% | 86.2% |
| 2013 | 59.7% | 85.9% |
| 2012 | 59.1% | 85.6% |
| 2011 | 58.6% | 85.3% |
| 2010 | 58% | 85.1% |
| 2009 | 57.5% | 84.9% |
| 2008 | 56.9% | 84.7% |
| 2007 | 56.3% | 84.6% |
| 2006 | 55.7% | 84.4% |
| 2005 | 55.2% | 84.3% |
| 2004 | 54.6% | 84.3% |
| 2003 | 54.3% | 84.2% |
| 2002 | 54% | 84.1% |
| 2001 | 53.7% | 84.1% |
| 2000 | 53.3% | 84% |
| 1999 | 53% | 84% |
| 1998 | 52.7% | 84% |
| 1997 | 52.4% | 83.9% |
| 1996 | 52% | 83.9% |
| 1995 | 51.7% | 83.8% |
| 1994 | 51.3% | 83.7% |
| 1993 | 50.6% | 83.5% |
| 1992 | 49.8% | 83.4% |
| 1991 | 49.1% | 83.2% |
| 1990 | 48.4% | 83.1% |
| 1989 | 47.7% | 83.1% |
| 1988 | 46.9% | 83.1% |
| 1987 | 46.2% | 83.1% |
| 1986 | 45.5% | 83.1% |
| 1985 | 44.8% | 83.1% |
| 1984 | 44.1% | 83.1% |
| 1983 | 43.3% | 83.1% |
| 1982 | 42.6% | 83.1% |
| 1981 | 41.9% | 83.1% |
| 1980 | 41.2% | 83.1% |
| 1979 | 40.5% | 83% |
| 1978 | 39.8% | 82.9% |
| 1977 | 39.1% | 82.9% |
| 1976 | 38.4% | 82.8% |
| 1975 | 37.7% | 82.7% |
| 1974 | 37% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 36.3% | 82.2% |
| 1972 | 35.7% | 81.9% |
| 1971 | 35% | 81.6% |
| 1970 | 34.5% | 81% |
| 1969 | 33.9% | 80.3% |
| 1968 | 33.4% | 79.5% |
| 1967 | 32.9% | 78.7% |
| 1966 | 32.4% | 77.9% |
| 1965 | 31.9% | 77.1% |
| 1964 | 31.4% | 76.2% |
| 1963 | 30.8% | 75.2% |
| 1962 | 30.3% | 74.3% |
| 1961 | 29.8% | 73.3% |
| 1960 | 29.4% | 72.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 54.6% to 65.6% in Morocco and from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Casablanca | 3.22M |
| Tangier | 1.28M |
| Fez | 1.11M |
| Marrakesh | 1M |
| Sale | 945K |
| Meknes | 601K |
| Rabat | 573K |
| Agadir | 538K |
| Kenitra | 508K |
| Oujda | 506K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons