Sweden has a population density of 67.2 people per square mile compared to 69.6 people in Vanuatu. Sweden has 455,646 sq ft of land per person vs 400,309 sq ft in Vanuatu. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Sweden and Vanuatu are ranked 163rd and 160th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Sweden has 0.13% of the world's population and 0.27% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.004% of the population and 0.008% of the land area for Vanuatu, hence the population density in Sweden is 3.48% lower than in Vanuatu.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 67.2 ppl/mi² | 69.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 163/197 | 160/197 |
| Population |
10654722
|
341110
|
| Land area | 157,248 sq mi | 4,707 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 414,753 sq ft | 400,309 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 73.9% |
| Urban population | 89% | 26.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Sweden vs Vanuatu:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Sweden increased by 17.5%, compared to a 59.3% growth in Vanuatu.
In 2004, Sweden ranked 151st for population density and is in 163rd place now. Vanuatu was 160th in 2004 and still ranks 160th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 67.2 | 69.6 |
| 2023 | 67 | 68.1 |
| 2022 | 66.7 | 66.5 |
| 2021 | 66.2 | 65 |
| 2020 | 65.8 | 63.5 |
| 2019 | 65.4 | 62 |
| 2018 | 64.7 | 60.6 |
| 2017 | 64 | 59.2 |
| 2016 | 63.1 | 57.8 |
| 2015 | 62.3 | 56.5 |
| 2014 | 61.7 | 55.3 |
| 2013 | 61 | 54.1 |
| 2012 | 60.5 | 52.9 |
| 2011 | 60.1 | 51.7 |
| 2010 | 59.6 | 50.6 |
| 2009 | 59.1 | 49.4 |
| 2008 | 58.6 | 48.2 |
| 2007 | 58.2 | 47 |
| 2006 | 57.7 | 45.9 |
| 2005 | 57.4 | 44.8 |
| 2004 | 57.2 | 43.7 |
| 2003 | 57 | 42.7 |
| 2002 | 56.7 | 41.6 |
| 2001 | 56.6 | 40.6 |
| 2000 | 56.4 | 39.6 |
| 1999 | 56.3 | 38.7 |
| 1998 | 56.3 | 37.9 |
| 1997 | 56.2 | 37.1 |
| 1996 | 56.2 | 36.3 |
| 1995 | 56.1 | 35.5 |
| 1994 | 55.8 | 34.7 |
| 1993 | 55.4 | 33.9 |
| 1992 | 55.1 | 33.1 |
| 1991 | 54.8 | 32.3 |
| 1990 | 54.4 | 31.5 |
| 1989 | 54 | 30.7 |
| 1988 | 53.6 | 29.9 |
| 1987 | 53.4 | 29.1 |
| 1986 | 53.2 | 28.4 |
| 1985 | 53.1 | 27.7 |
| 1984 | 53 | 27 |
| 1983 | 53 | 26.3 |
| 1982 | 52.9 | 25.7 |
| 1981 | 52.9 | 25.1 |
| 1980 | 52.8 | 24.6 |
| 1979 | 52.7 | 24 |
| 1978 | 52.6 | 23.4 |
| 1977 | 52.5 | 22.7 |
| 1976 | 52.3 | 22 |
| 1975 | 52.1 | 21.3 |
| 1974 | 51.9 | 20.7 |
| 1973 | 51.7 | 20 |
| 1972 | 51.6 | 19.5 |
| 1971 | 51.5 | 18.9 |
| 1970 | 51.1 | 18.3 |
| 1969 | 50.7 | 17.8 |
| 1968 | 50.3 | 17.3 |
| 1967 | 50 | 16.8 |
| 1966 | 49.6 | 16.3 |
| 1965 | 49.2 | 15.8 |
| 1964 | 48.7 | 15.3 |
| 1963 | 48.4 | 14.9 |
| 1962 | 48.1 | 14.5 |
| 1961 | 47.8 | 14.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 26.1% |
| 2023 | 88.7% | 26% |
| 2022 | 88.5% | 25.8% |
| 2021 | 88.2% | 25.7% |
| 2020 | 88% | 25.5% |
| 2019 | 87.7% | 25.4% |
| 2018 | 87.4% | 25.3% |
| 2017 | 87.1% | 25.2% |
| 2016 | 86.9% | 25.1% |
| 2015 | 86.6% | 25% |
| 2014 | 86.2% | 24.9% |
| 2013 | 85.9% | 24.8% |
| 2012 | 85.6% | 24.7% |
| 2011 | 85.3% | 24.6% |
| 2010 | 85.1% | 24.5% |
| 2009 | 84.9% | 24.3% |
| 2008 | 84.7% | 24% |
| 2007 | 84.6% | 23.7% |
| 2006 | 84.4% | 23.4% |
| 2005 | 84.3% | 23.1% |
| 2004 | 84.3% | 22.8% |
| 2003 | 84.2% | 22.5% |
| 2002 | 84.1% | 22.2% |
| 2001 | 84.1% | 22% |
| 2000 | 84% | 21.7% |
| 1999 | 84% | 21.4% |
| 1998 | 84% | 21.1% |
| 1997 | 83.9% | 20.8% |
| 1996 | 83.9% | 20.5% |
| 1995 | 83.8% | 20.2% |
| 1994 | 83.7% | 19.9% |
| 1993 | 83.5% | 19.6% |
| 1992 | 83.4% | 19.3% |
| 1991 | 83.2% | 19% |
| 1990 | 83.1% | 18.7% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 18.4% |
| 1988 | 83.1% | 18% |
| 1987 | 83.1% | 17.6% |
| 1986 | 83.1% | 17.1% |
| 1985 | 83.1% | 16.7% |
| 1984 | 83.1% | 16.3% |
| 1983 | 83.1% | 15.9% |
| 1982 | 83.1% | 15.5% |
| 1981 | 83.1% | 15.1% |
| 1980 | 83.1% | 14.7% |
| 1979 | 83% | 14.4% |
| 1978 | 82.9% | 14.1% |
| 1977 | 82.9% | 13.8% |
| 1976 | 82.8% | 13.6% |
| 1975 | 82.7% | 13.4% |
| 1974 | 82.5% | 13.2% |
| 1973 | 82.2% | 13% |
| 1972 | 81.9% | 12.7% |
| 1971 | 81.6% | 12.5% |
| 1970 | 81% | 12.3% |
| 1969 | 80.3% | 12.1% |
| 1968 | 79.5% | 11.9% |
| 1967 | 78.7% | 11.7% |
| 1966 | 77.9% | 11.5% |
| 1965 | 77.1% | 11.3% |
| 1964 | 76.2% | 11.1% |
| 1963 | 75.2% | 10.9% |
| 1962 | 74.3% | 10.8% |
| 1961 | 73.3% | 10.6% |
| 1960 | 72.5% | 10.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 84.3% to 89% in Sweden and from 22.8% to 26.1% in Vanuatu.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Stockholm | 985K |
| Gothenburg | 675K |
| Malmo | 339K |
| Uppsala | 175K |
| Norrkoping | 98.2K |
| Umea | 94.2K |
| Solna | 85.8K |
| Sodertalje | 78.4K |
| Sollentuna | 77.7K |
| Halmstad | 73K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons