Ecuador has a population density of 189.1 people per square mile compared to 844 people in Pakistan. Ecuador has 152,658 sq ft of land per person vs 37,780 sq ft in Pakistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Ecuador and Pakistan are ranked 117th and 29th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Ecuador has 0.22% of the world's population and 0.17% of the land area of all countries, compared to 3.09% of the population and 0.52% of the land area for Pakistan, hence the population density in Ecuador is 77.6% lower than in Pakistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 189.1 ppl/mi² | 844 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 117/197 | 29/197 |
| Population |
18414090
|
258497127
|
| Land area | 95,892 sq mi | 297,638 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 147,409 sq ft | 33,023 sq ft |
| Rural population | 35% | 61.6% |
| Urban population | 65% | 38.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 24.3% | 16.3% |
Ecuador vs Pakistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Ecuador increased by 33.3%, compared to a 46.7% growth in Pakistan.
In 2004, Ecuador ranked 118th for population density and is in 117th place now. Pakistan was 38th in 2004 and ranks 29th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 189.1 | 844 |
| 2023 | 187.5 | 832 |
| 2022 | 185.9 | 819 |
| 2021 | 184.4 | 805 |
| 2020 | 183 | 790 |
| 2019 | 180.8 | 775 |
| 2018 | 177.8 | 762 |
| 2017 | 174.8 | 750 |
| 2016 | 172.1 | 740 |
| 2015 | 169.6 | 730 |
| 2014 | 167.2 | 720 |
| 2013 | 164.8 | 709 |
| 2012 | 162.4 | 698 |
| 2011 | 159.8 | 685 |
| 2010 | 157.2 | 669 |
| 2009 | 154.6 | 653 |
| 2008 | 152 | 637 |
| 2007 | 149.4 | 620 |
| 2006 | 146.9 | 604 |
| 2005 | 144.4 | 589 |
| 2004 | 141.9 | 575 |
| 2003 | 139.5 | 561 |
| 2002 | 137 | 548 |
| 2001 | 134.6 | 535 |
| 2000 | 132.3 | 520 |
| 1999 | 130 | 506 |
| 1998 | 127.8 | 492 |
| 1997 | 112.6 | 479 |
| 1996 | 110.5 | 466 |
| 1995 | 108.4 | 452 |
| 1994 | 106.4 | 439 |
| 1993 | 104.4 | 427 |
| 1992 | 102.3 | 415 |
| 1991 | 100.1 | 403 |
| 1990 | 98 | 390 |
| 1989 | 95.8 | 377 |
| 1988 | 93.7 | 365 |
| 1987 | 91.5 | 353 |
| 1986 | 89.3 | 341 |
| 1985 | 87.1 | 330 |
| 1984 | 84.9 | 320 |
| 1983 | 82.7 | 310 |
| 1982 | 80.6 | 299.3 |
| 1981 | 78.5 | 288.3 |
| 1980 | 76.4 | 276.5 |
| 1979 | 74.4 | 265.4 |
| 1978 | 72.4 | 256.4 |
| 1977 | 70.4 | 248.3 |
| 1976 | 68.5 | 240.6 |
| 1975 | 66.6 | 233.4 |
| 1974 | 64.7 | 226.5 |
| 1973 | 62.9 | 219.9 |
| 1972 | 61.1 | 213.6 |
| 1971 | 59.3 | 207.8 |
| 1970 | 57.6 | 202.1 |
| 1969 | 55.9 | 196.4 |
| 1968 | 54.3 | 190.9 |
| 1967 | 52.7 | 185.5 |
| 1966 | 51.1 | 180.3 |
| 1965 | 49.6 | 175.4 |
| 1964 | 48.2 | 170.7 |
| 1963 | 46.8 | 166.1 |
| 1962 | 45.5 | 161.8 |
| 1961 | 44.2 | 157.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65% | 38.4% |
| 2023 | 64.8% | 38% |
| 2022 | 64.6% | 37.7% |
| 2021 | 64.4% | 37.4% |
| 2020 | 64.2% | 37.2% |
| 2019 | 64% | 36.9% |
| 2018 | 63.8% | 36.7% |
| 2017 | 63.7% | 36.4% |
| 2016 | 63.5% | 36.2% |
| 2015 | 63.4% | 36% |
| 2014 | 63.3% | 35.8% |
| 2013 | 63.1% | 35.6% |
| 2012 | 63% | 35.4% |
| 2011 | 62.9% | 35.2% |
| 2010 | 62.7% | 35% |
| 2009 | 62.5% | 34.8% |
| 2008 | 62.3% | 34.6% |
| 2007 | 62.1% | 34.4% |
| 2006 | 61.9% | 34.2% |
| 2005 | 61.7% | 34% |
| 2004 | 61.5% | 33.8% |
| 2003 | 61.3% | 33.6% |
| 2002 | 61.1% | 33.4% |
| 2001 | 60.8% | 33.2% |
| 2000 | 60.3% | 33% |
| 1999 | 59.8% | 32.8% |
| 1998 | 59.3% | 32.6% |
| 1997 | 58.8% | 32.3% |
| 1996 | 58.3% | 32.1% |
| 1995 | 57.8% | 31.8% |
| 1994 | 57.3% | 31.6% |
| 1993 | 56.7% | 31.3% |
| 1992 | 56.2% | 31.1% |
| 1991 | 55.7% | 30.8% |
| 1990 | 55.1% | 30.6% |
| 1989 | 54.3% | 30.3% |
| 1988 | 53.5% | 30.1% |
| 1987 | 52.8% | 29.8% |
| 1986 | 52% | 29.6% |
| 1985 | 51.2% | 29.3% |
| 1984 | 50.4% | 29.1% |
| 1983 | 49.7% | 28.9% |
| 1982 | 48.8% | 28.6% |
| 1981 | 47.9% | 28.4% |
| 1980 | 47% | 28.1% |
| 1979 | 46% | 27.7% |
| 1978 | 45.1% | 27.4% |
| 1977 | 44.2% | 27% |
| 1976 | 43.3% | 26.7% |
| 1975 | 42.4% | 26.3% |
| 1974 | 41.5% | 26% |
| 1973 | 40.9% | 25.7% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 25.4% |
| 1971 | 39.8% | 25.1% |
| 1970 | 39.3% | 24.8% |
| 1969 | 38.7% | 24.6% |
| 1968 | 38.2% | 24.3% |
| 1967 | 37.7% | 24% |
| 1966 | 37.2% | 23.8% |
| 1965 | 36.6% | 23.5% |
| 1964 | 36.1% | 23.3% |
| 1963 | 35.6% | 23% |
| 1962 | 35.1% | 22.8% |
| 1961 | 34.5% | 22.5% |
| 1960 | 33.9% | 22.1% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 61.5% to 65% in Ecuador and from 33.8% to 38.4% in Pakistan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guayaquil | 2.65M |
| Quito | 1.76M |
| Cuenca | 362K |
| Santo Domingo | 335K |
| Duran | 295K |
| Machala | 288K |
| Manta | 259K |
| Portoviejo | 244K |
| Loja | 203K |
| Quevedo | 178K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Karachi | 14.9M |
| Lahore | 11.1M |
| Faisalabad | 3.2M |
| Rawalpindi | 2.1M |
| Gujranwala | 2.03M |
| Peshawar | 1.97M |
| Multan | 1.87M |
| Hyderabad | 1.73M |
| Islamabad | 1.01M |
| Quetta | 1M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons