Pakistan has a population density of 844 people per square mile compared to 99.6 people in Palau. Pakistan has 37,780 sq ft of land per person vs 283,195 sq ft in Palau. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Pakistan and Palau are ranked 29th and 147th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Pakistan has 3.09% of the world's population and 0.52% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.0002% of the population and 0.0003% of the land area for Palau, hence the population density in Pakistan is 747% higher than in Palau.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 844 ppl/mi² | 99.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 29/197 | 147/197 |
| Population |
258497127
|
17663
|
| Land area | 297,638 sq mi | 177.6 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 33,023 sq ft | 279,819 sq ft |
| Rural population | 61.6% | 17.2% |
| Urban population | 38.4% | 82.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 16.3% | 0% |
Pakistan vs Palau:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Pakistan increased by 46.7%, compared to a 10.7% decline in Palau.
In 2004, Pakistan ranked 38th for population density and is in 29th place now. Palau was 129th in 2004 and ranks 147th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 844 | 99.6 |
| 2023 | 832 | 99.8 |
| 2022 | 819 | 100 |
| 2021 | 805 | 100.1 |
| 2020 | 790 | 100.2 |
| 2019 | 775 | 100.2 |
| 2018 | 762 | 100.3 |
| 2017 | 750 | 100.3 |
| 2016 | 740 | 100.2 |
| 2015 | 730 | 100.1 |
| 2014 | 720 | 99.7 |
| 2013 | 709 | 99.4 |
| 2012 | 698 | 100 |
| 2011 | 685 | 101.8 |
| 2010 | 669 | 103.6 |
| 2009 | 653 | 105.3 |
| 2008 | 637 | 107 |
| 2007 | 620 | 108.7 |
| 2006 | 604 | 110.3 |
| 2005 | 589 | 111.6 |
| 2004 | 575 | 111.6 |
| 2003 | 561 | 110.7 |
| 2002 | 548 | 109.8 |
| 2001 | 535 | 109 |
| 2000 | 520 | 108 |
| 1999 | 506 | 106.4 |
| 1998 | 492 | 104.3 |
| 1997 | 479 | 102 |
| 1996 | 466 | 99.4 |
| 1995 | 452 | 96.8 |
| 1994 | 439 | 94.4 |
| 1993 | 427 | 92.2 |
| 1992 | 415 | 90 |
| 1991 | 403 | 87.9 |
| 1990 | 390 | - |
| 1989 | 377 | - |
| 1988 | 365 | - |
| 1987 | 353 | - |
| 1986 | 341 | - |
| 1985 | 330 | - |
| 1984 | 320 | - |
| 1983 | 310 | - |
| 1982 | 299.3 | - |
| 1981 | 288.3 | - |
| 1980 | 276.5 | - |
| 1979 | 265.4 | - |
| 1978 | 256.4 | - |
| 1977 | 248.3 | - |
| 1976 | 240.6 | - |
| 1975 | 233.4 | - |
| 1974 | 226.5 | - |
| 1973 | 219.9 | - |
| 1972 | 213.6 | - |
| 1971 | 207.8 | - |
| 1970 | 202.1 | - |
| 1969 | 196.4 | - |
| 1968 | 190.9 | - |
| 1967 | 185.5 | - |
| 1966 | 180.3 | - |
| 1965 | 175.4 | - |
| 1964 | 170.7 | - |
| 1963 | 166.1 | - |
| 1962 | 161.8 | - |
| 1961 | 157.6 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 38.4% | 82.8% |
| 2023 | 38% | 82.4% |
| 2022 | 37.7% | 82% |
| 2021 | 37.4% | 81.5% |
| 2020 | 37.2% | 81% |
| 2019 | 36.9% | 80.5% |
| 2018 | 36.7% | 79.9% |
| 2017 | 36.4% | 79.4% |
| 2016 | 36.2% | 78.8% |
| 2015 | 36% | 78.2% |
| 2014 | 35.8% | 77.5% |
| 2013 | 35.6% | 76.9% |
| 2012 | 35.4% | 76.2% |
| 2011 | 35.2% | 75.5% |
| 2010 | 35% | 74.8% |
| 2009 | 34.8% | 74.1% |
| 2008 | 34.6% | 73.4% |
| 2007 | 34.4% | 72.7% |
| 2006 | 34.2% | 71.9% |
| 2005 | 34% | 71.2% |
| 2004 | 33.8% | 70.4% |
| 2003 | 33.6% | 69.6% |
| 2002 | 33.4% | 69.8% |
| 2001 | 33.2% | 70.1% |
| 2000 | 33% | 70.3% |
| 1999 | 32.8% | 70.6% |
| 1998 | 32.6% | 70.8% |
| 1997 | 32.3% | 71.1% |
| 1996 | 32.1% | 71.3% |
| 1995 | 31.8% | 71.4% |
| 1994 | 31.6% | 71.1% |
| 1993 | 31.3% | 70.7% |
| 1992 | 31.1% | 70.3% |
| 1991 | 30.8% | 70% |
| 1990 | 30.6% | 69.6% |
| 1989 | 30.3% | 69.2% |
| 1988 | 30.1% | 68.9% |
| 1987 | 29.8% | 68.5% |
| 1986 | 29.6% | 68.2% |
| 1985 | 29.3% | 67.4% |
| 1984 | 29.1% | 66.4% |
| 1983 | 28.9% | 65.4% |
| 1982 | 28.6% | 64.4% |
| 1981 | 28.4% | 63.4% |
| 1980 | 28.1% | 62.5% |
| 1979 | 27.7% | 62.3% |
| 1978 | 27.4% | 62% |
| 1977 | 27% | 61.7% |
| 1976 | 26.7% | 61.4% |
| 1975 | 26.3% | 61.1% |
| 1974 | 26% | 60.9% |
| 1973 | 25.7% | 60.6% |
| 1972 | 25.4% | 60.3% |
| 1971 | 25.1% | 60% |
| 1970 | 24.8% | 59.7% |
| 1969 | 24.6% | 59.4% |
| 1968 | 24.3% | 59.1% |
| 1967 | 24% | 58.9% |
| 1966 | 23.8% | 58.6% |
| 1965 | 23.5% | 58.3% |
| 1964 | 23.3% | 58% |
| 1963 | 23% | 57.7% |
| 1962 | 22.8% | 57.4% |
| 1961 | 22.5% | 57.1% |
| 1960 | 22.1% | 56.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 33.8% to 38.4% in Pakistan and from 70.4% to 82.8% in Palau.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Karachi | 14.9M |
| Lahore | 11.1M |
| Faisalabad | 3.2M |
| Rawalpindi | 2.1M |
| Gujranwala | 2.03M |
| Peshawar | 1.97M |
| Multan | 1.87M |
| Hyderabad | 1.73M |
| Islamabad | 1.01M |
| Quetta | 1M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons