Pakistan has a population density of 844 people per square mile compared to 111.4 people in Zimbabwe. Pakistan has 37,780 sq ft of land per person vs 252,854 sq ft in Zimbabwe. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Pakistan and Zimbabwe are ranked 29th and 145th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Pakistan has 3.09% of the world's population and 0.52% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.2% of the population and 0.26% of the land area for Zimbabwe, hence the population density in Pakistan is 658% higher than in Zimbabwe.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 844 ppl/mi² | 111.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 29/197 | 145/197 |
| Population |
258497127
|
17210092
|
| Land area | 297,638 sq mi | 149,364 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 33,023 sq ft | 250,326 sq ft |
| Rural population | 61.6% | 67.3% |
| Urban population | 38.4% | 32.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 16.3% | 22.8% |
Pakistan vs Zimbabwe:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Pakistan increased by 46.7%, compared to a 34.5% growth in Zimbabwe.
In 2004, Pakistan ranked 38th for population density and is in 29th place now. Zimbabwe was 144th in 2004 and ranks 145th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 844 | 111.4 |
| 2023 | 832 | 109.4 |
| 2022 | 819 | 107.6 |
| 2021 | 805 | 105.8 |
| 2020 | 790 | 104 |
| 2019 | 775 | 102.2 |
| 2018 | 762 | 100.7 |
| 2017 | 750 | 99.2 |
| 2016 | 740 | 97.8 |
| 2015 | 730 | 96.4 |
| 2014 | 720 | 95.1 |
| 2013 | 709 | 93.8 |
| 2012 | 698 | 92.5 |
| 2011 | 685 | 91 |
| 2010 | 669 | 89.4 |
| 2009 | 653 | 88 |
| 2008 | 637 | 86.8 |
| 2007 | 620 | 85.7 |
| 2006 | 604 | 84.6 |
| 2005 | 589 | 83.6 |
| 2004 | 575 | 82.8 |
| 2003 | 561 | 81.9 |
| 2002 | 548 | 80.9 |
| 2001 | 535 | 80.2 |
| 2000 | 520 | 79.6 |
| 1999 | 506 | 78.9 |
| 1998 | 492 | 77.6 |
| 1997 | 479 | 76.1 |
| 1996 | 466 | 74.7 |
| 1995 | 452 | 73.5 |
| 1994 | 439 | 72.8 |
| 1993 | 427 | 72.7 |
| 1992 | 415 | 71.7 |
| 1991 | 403 | 69.7 |
| 1990 | 390 | 67.9 |
| 1989 | 377 | 66 |
| 1988 | 365 | 64.2 |
| 1987 | 353 | 62.2 |
| 1986 | 341 | 60.1 |
| 1985 | 330 | 58.2 |
| 1984 | 320 | 56.2 |
| 1983 | 310 | 54.2 |
| 1982 | 299.3 | 52.2 |
| 1981 | 288.3 | 50.2 |
| 1980 | 276.5 | 47.1 |
| 1979 | 265.4 | 44.5 |
| 1978 | 256.4 | 43.8 |
| 1977 | 248.3 | 43.2 |
| 1976 | 240.6 | 42.1 |
| 1975 | 233.4 | 40.8 |
| 1974 | 226.5 | 39.6 |
| 1973 | 219.9 | 38.3 |
| 1972 | 213.6 | 37.1 |
| 1971 | 207.8 | 36 |
| 1970 | 202.1 | 34.9 |
| 1969 | 196.4 | 33.9 |
| 1968 | 190.9 | 32.8 |
| 1967 | 185.5 | 31.8 |
| 1966 | 180.3 | 30.8 |
| 1965 | 175.4 | 29.8 |
| 1964 | 170.7 | 28.9 |
| 1963 | 166.1 | 28 |
| 1962 | 161.8 | 27.2 |
| 1961 | 157.6 | 26.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 38.4% | 32.7% |
| 2023 | 38% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 37.7% | 32.4% |
| 2021 | 37.4% | 32.3% |
| 2020 | 37.2% | 32.2% |
| 2019 | 36.9% | 32.2% |
| 2018 | 36.7% | 32.2% |
| 2017 | 36.4% | 32.2% |
| 2016 | 36.2% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 36% | 32.4% |
| 2014 | 35.8% | 32.5% |
| 2013 | 35.6% | 32.7% |
| 2012 | 35.4% | 32.8% |
| 2011 | 35.2% | 33% |
| 2010 | 35% | 33.2% |
| 2009 | 34.8% | 33.4% |
| 2008 | 34.6% | 33.6% |
| 2007 | 34.4% | 33.7% |
| 2006 | 34.2% | 33.9% |
| 2005 | 34% | 34.1% |
| 2004 | 33.8% | 34.3% |
| 2003 | 33.6% | 34.5% |
| 2002 | 33.4% | 34.6% |
| 2001 | 33.2% | 34.2% |
| 2000 | 33% | 33.8% |
| 1999 | 32.8% | 33.3% |
| 1998 | 32.6% | 32.9% |
| 1997 | 32.3% | 32.5% |
| 1996 | 32.1% | 32.1% |
| 1995 | 31.8% | 31.7% |
| 1994 | 31.6% | 31.3% |
| 1993 | 31.3% | 30.9% |
| 1992 | 31.1% | 30.5% |
| 1991 | 30.8% | 29.7% |
| 1990 | 30.6% | 29% |
| 1989 | 30.3% | 28.2% |
| 1988 | 30.1% | 27.5% |
| 1987 | 29.8% | 26.8% |
| 1986 | 29.6% | 26.1% |
| 1985 | 29.3% | 25.4% |
| 1984 | 29.1% | 24.7% |
| 1983 | 28.9% | 24.1% |
| 1982 | 28.6% | 23.4% |
| 1981 | 28.4% | 22.9% |
| 1980 | 28.1% | 22.4% |
| 1979 | 27.7% | 21.9% |
| 1978 | 27.4% | 21.3% |
| 1977 | 27% | 20.8% |
| 1976 | 26.7% | 20.4% |
| 1975 | 26.3% | 19.9% |
| 1974 | 26% | 19.4% |
| 1973 | 25.7% | 18.9% |
| 1972 | 25.4% | 18.4% |
| 1971 | 25.1% | 17.9% |
| 1970 | 24.8% | 17.4% |
| 1969 | 24.6% | 16.9% |
| 1968 | 24.3% | 16.3% |
| 1967 | 24% | 15.7% |
| 1966 | 23.8% | 15.2% |
| 1965 | 23.5% | 14.6% |
| 1964 | 23.3% | 14.1% |
| 1963 | 23% | 13.6% |
| 1962 | 22.8% | 13.1% |
| 1961 | 22.5% | 12.8% |
| 1960 | 22.1% | 12.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 33.8% to 38.4% in Pakistan and from 34.3% to 32.7% in Zimbabwe.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Karachi | 14.9M |
| Lahore | 11.1M |
| Faisalabad | 3.2M |
| Rawalpindi | 2.1M |
| Gujranwala | 2.03M |
| Peshawar | 1.97M |
| Multan | 1.87M |
| Hyderabad | 1.73M |
| Islamabad | 1.01M |
| Quetta | 1M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons