Finland has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 213.7 people in Uzbekistan. Finland has 646,303 sq ft of land per person vs 132,907 sq ft in Uzbekistan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Finland and Uzbekistan are ranked 173rd and 106th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Finland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.45% of the population and 0.3% of the land area for Uzbekistan, hence the population density in Finland is 77.5% lower than in Uzbekistan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 213.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 173/197 | 106/197 |
| Population |
5643254
|
37592263
|
| Land area | 117,360 sq mi | 170,136 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,393 sq ft | 130,442 sq ft |
| Rural population | 14.1% | 49.4% |
| Urban population | 85.9% | 50.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 8.13% |
Finland vs Uzbekistan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Finland increased by 8.05%, compared to a 38.2% growth in Uzbekistan.
In 2004, Finland ranked 157th for population density and is in 173rd place now. Uzbekistan was 114th in 2004 and ranks 106th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 213.7 |
| 2023 | 47.6 | 209.6 |
| 2022 | 47.3 | 205.4 |
| 2021 | 47.2 | 201.3 |
| 2020 | 47.1 | 197.4 |
| 2019 | 47.1 | 193.8 |
| 2018 | 47 | 190.3 |
| 2017 | 46.9 | 187 |
| 2016 | 46.8 | 183.9 |
| 2015 | 46.7 | 180.8 |
| 2014 | 46.5 | 179.6 |
| 2013 | 46.4 | 176.7 |
| 2012 | 46.1 | 173.9 |
| 2011 | 45.9 | 171.3 |
| 2010 | 45.7 | 168.7 |
| 2009 | 45.5 | 166 |
| 2008 | 45.3 | 163.3 |
| 2007 | 45 | 160.8 |
| 2006 | 44.9 | 158.7 |
| 2005 | 44.6 | 156.6 |
| 2004 | 44.5 | 154.7 |
| 2003 | 44.3 | 152.8 |
| 2002 | 44.2 | 150.9 |
| 2001 | 44.1 | 149.1 |
| 2000 | 44 | 147.3 |
| 1999 | 43.9 | 149 |
| 1998 | 43.8 | 146.9 |
| 1997 | 43.7 | 144.7 |
| 1996 | 43.6 | 142.2 |
| 1995 | 43.4 | 139.5 |
| 1994 | 43.3 | 136.8 |
| 1993 | 43.1 | 133.9 |
| 1992 | 42.9 | 130.8 |
| 1991 | 42.6 | - |
| 1990 | 42.4 | - |
| 1989 | 42.2 | - |
| 1988 | 42.1 | - |
| 1987 | 41.9 | - |
| 1986 | 41.8 | - |
| 1985 | 41.7 | - |
| 1984 | 41.5 | - |
| 1983 | 41.3 | - |
| 1982 | 41 | - |
| 1981 | 40.8 | - |
| 1980 | 40.6 | - |
| 1979 | 40.5 | - |
| 1978 | 40.4 | - |
| 1977 | 40.3 | - |
| 1976 | 40.2 | - |
| 1975 | 40.1 | - |
| 1974 | 39.9 | - |
| 1973 | 39.7 | - |
| 1972 | 39.5 | - |
| 1971 | 39.2 | - |
| 1970 | 39.2 | - |
| 1969 | 39.3 | - |
| 1968 | 39.3 | - |
| 1967 | 39.2 | - |
| 1966 | 39 | - |
| 1965 | 38.8 | - |
| 1964 | 38.7 | - |
| 1963 | 38.5 | - |
| 1962 | 38.2 | - |
| 1961 | 37.9 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 85.9% | 50.6% |
| 2023 | 85.8% | 50.5% |
| 2022 | 85.7% | 50.5% |
| 2021 | 85.6% | 50.4% |
| 2020 | 85.5% | 50.4% |
| 2019 | 85.4% | 50.4% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | 50.5% |
| 2017 | 85.3% | 50.5% |
| 2016 | 85.3% | 50.7% |
| 2015 | 85.2% | 50.7% |
| 2014 | 85.2% | 50.8% |
| 2013 | 85.1% | 50.9% |
| 2012 | 84.8% | 51% |
| 2011 | 84.3% | 51.2% |
| 2010 | 83.8% | 51% |
| 2009 | 83.4% | 50.5% |
| 2008 | 83.3% | 50% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | 49.5% |
| 2006 | 83% | 49% |
| 2005 | 82.9% | 48.5% |
| 2004 | 82.8% | 48.1% |
| 2003 | 82.6% | 47.6% |
| 2002 | 82.5% | 47.1% |
| 2001 | 82.4% | 46.6% |
| 2000 | 82.2% | 46.1% |
| 1999 | 81.9% | 45.6% |
| 1998 | 81.7% | 45.2% |
| 1997 | 81.5% | 44.7% |
| 1996 | 81.2% | 44.2% |
| 1995 | 81% | 43.7% |
| 1994 | 80.7% | 43.3% |
| 1993 | 80.4% | 42.8% |
| 1992 | 80.1% | 42.3% |
| 1991 | 79.8% | 41.8% |
| 1990 | 79.4% | 41.4% |
| 1989 | 78.7% | 40.9% |
| 1988 | 78% | 40.7% |
| 1987 | 77.3% | 40.7% |
| 1986 | 76.6% | 40.7% |
| 1985 | 75.8% | 40.7% |
| 1984 | 75% | 40.7% |
| 1983 | 74.2% | 40.7% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 40.8% |
| 1981 | 72.5% | 40.8% |
| 1980 | 71.7% | 40.8% |
| 1979 | 71% | 40.8% |
| 1978 | 70.2% | 40.5% |
| 1977 | 69.4% | 40.1% |
| 1976 | 68.6% | 39.6% |
| 1975 | 67.8% | 39.1% |
| 1974 | 67% | 38.6% |
| 1973 | 66.2% | 38.1% |
| 1972 | 65.4% | 37.7% |
| 1971 | 64.5% | 37.2% |
| 1970 | 63.7% | 36.7% |
| 1969 | 62.9% | 36.4% |
| 1968 | 62.1% | 36.1% |
| 1967 | 61.3% | 35.8% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 35.6% |
| 1965 | 59.7% | 35.3% |
| 1964 | 58.8% | 35% |
| 1963 | 58% | 34.8% |
| 1962 | 57.2% | 34.5% |
| 1961 | 56.3% | 34.2% |
| 1960 | 55.3% | 34% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland and from 48.1% to 50.6% in Uzbekistan.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons