Finland has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 120.1 people in Montenegro. Finland has 646,303 sq ft of land per person vs 239,545 sq ft in Montenegro. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Finland and Montenegro are ranked 173rd and 141st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Finland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.008% of the population and 0.009% of the land area for Montenegro, hence the population density in Finland is 60% lower than in Montenegro.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 120.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 173/197 | 141/197 |
| Population |
5643254
|
618209
|
| Land area | 117,360 sq mi | 5,193 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,393 sq ft | 232,073 sq ft |
| Rural population | 14.1% | 31.2% |
| Urban population | 85.9% | 68.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Finland vs Montenegro:
Population density chart by year
From 2006 to 2024, population density in Finland increased by 7.1%, compared to a 1.43% growth in Montenegro.
In 2006, Finland ranked 163rd for population density and is in 173rd place now. Montenegro was 127th in 2006 and ranks 141st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 120.1 |
| 2023 | 47.6 | 120.1 |
| 2022 | 47.3 | 120.1 |
| 2021 | 47.2 | 120.4 |
| 2020 | 47.1 | 120.7 |
| 2019 | 47.1 | 120.7 |
| 2018 | 47 | 120.6 |
| 2017 | 46.9 | 120.5 |
| 2016 | 46.8 | 120.4 |
| 2015 | 46.7 | 120.3 |
| 2014 | 46.5 | 120.1 |
| 2013 | 46.4 | 119.9 |
| 2012 | 46.1 | 119.7 |
| 2011 | 45.9 | 119.5 |
| 2010 | 45.7 | 119.3 |
| 2009 | 45.5 | 119.1 |
| 2008 | 45.3 | 118.8 |
| 2007 | 45 | 118.6 |
| 2006 | 44.9 | 118.4 |
| 2005 | 44.6 | - |
| 2004 | 44.5 | - |
| 2003 | 44.3 | - |
| 2002 | 44.2 | - |
| 2001 | 44.1 | - |
| 2000 | 44 | - |
| 1999 | 43.9 | - |
| 1998 | 43.8 | - |
| 1997 | 43.7 | - |
| 1996 | 43.6 | - |
| 1995 | 43.4 | - |
| 1994 | 43.3 | - |
| 1993 | 43.1 | - |
| 1992 | 42.9 | - |
| 1991 | 42.6 | - |
| 1990 | 42.4 | - |
| 1989 | 42.2 | - |
| 1988 | 42.1 | - |
| 1987 | 41.9 | - |
| 1986 | 41.8 | - |
| 1985 | 41.7 | - |
| 1984 | 41.5 | - |
| 1983 | 41.3 | - |
| 1982 | 41 | - |
| 1981 | 40.8 | - |
| 1980 | 40.6 | - |
| 1979 | 40.5 | - |
| 1978 | 40.4 | - |
| 1977 | 40.3 | - |
| 1976 | 40.2 | - |
| 1975 | 40.1 | - |
| 1974 | 39.9 | - |
| 1973 | 39.7 | - |
| 1972 | 39.5 | - |
| 1971 | 39.2 | - |
| 1970 | 39.2 | - |
| 1969 | 39.3 | - |
| 1968 | 39.3 | - |
| 1967 | 39.2 | - |
| 1966 | 39 | - |
| 1965 | 38.8 | - |
| 1964 | 38.7 | - |
| 1963 | 38.5 | - |
| 1962 | 38.2 | - |
| 1961 | 37.9 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 85.9% | 68.8% |
| 2023 | 85.8% | 68.5% |
| 2022 | 85.7% | 68.2% |
| 2021 | 85.6% | 67.8% |
| 2020 | 85.5% | 67.5% |
| 2019 | 85.4% | 67.2% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | 66.8% |
| 2017 | 85.3% | 66.5% |
| 2016 | 85.3% | 66.1% |
| 2015 | 85.2% | 65.8% |
| 2014 | 85.2% | 65.5% |
| 2013 | 85.1% | 65.1% |
| 2012 | 84.8% | 64.8% |
| 2011 | 84.3% | 64.5% |
| 2010 | 83.8% | 64.1% |
| 2009 | 83.4% | 63.8% |
| 2008 | 83.3% | 63.5% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | 63.1% |
| 2006 | 83% | 62.8% |
| 2005 | 82.9% | 62.5% |
| 2004 | 82.8% | 62.1% |
| 2003 | 82.6% | 61.6% |
| 2002 | 82.5% | 60.6% |
| 2001 | 82.4% | 59.6% |
| 2000 | 82.2% | 58.5% |
| 1999 | 81.9% | 57.5% |
| 1998 | 81.7% | 56.5% |
| 1997 | 81.5% | 55.5% |
| 1996 | 81.2% | 54.4% |
| 1995 | 81% | 53.4% |
| 1994 | 80.7% | 52.3% |
| 1993 | 80.4% | 51.3% |
| 1992 | 80.1% | 50.2% |
| 1991 | 79.8% | 49.2% |
| 1990 | 79.4% | 48% |
| 1989 | 78.7% | 46.9% |
| 1988 | 78% | 45.7% |
| 1987 | 77.3% | 44.6% |
| 1986 | 76.6% | 43.5% |
| 1985 | 75.8% | 42.3% |
| 1984 | 75% | 41.2% |
| 1983 | 74.2% | 40.1% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 39% |
| 1981 | 72.5% | 37.9% |
| 1980 | 71.7% | 36.8% |
| 1979 | 71% | 35.7% |
| 1978 | 70.2% | 34.7% |
| 1977 | 69.4% | 33.7% |
| 1976 | 68.6% | 32.6% |
| 1975 | 67.8% | 31.6% |
| 1974 | 67% | 30.6% |
| 1973 | 66.2% | 29.7% |
| 1972 | 65.4% | 28.7% |
| 1971 | 64.5% | 27.8% |
| 1970 | 63.7% | 26.9% |
| 1969 | 62.9% | 26% |
| 1968 | 62.1% | 25.1% |
| 1967 | 61.3% | 24.2% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 23.4% |
| 1965 | 59.7% | 22.6% |
| 1964 | 58.8% | 21.8% |
| 1963 | 58% | 21% |
| 1962 | 57.2% | 20.2% |
| 1961 | 56.3% | 19.5% |
| 1960 | 55.3% | 18.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland and from 62.1% to 68.8% in Montenegro.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons