Finland has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 19.8 people in Kazakhstan. Finland has 646,303 sq ft of land per person vs 1,424,328 sq ft in Kazakhstan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Finland and Kazakhstan are ranked 173rd and 187th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Finland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.25% of the population and 1.81% of the land area for Kazakhstan, hence the population density in Finland is 143.1% higher than in Kazakhstan.
Population density comparison
Finland
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 19.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 173/197 | 187/197 |
| Population |
5643254
|
21036432
|
| Land area | 117,360 sq mi | 1,042,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,393 sq ft | 1,411,156 sq ft |
| Rural population | 14.1% | 41.6% |
| Urban population | 85.9% | 58.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 21.8% |
Finland vs Kazakhstan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Finland increased by 8.05%, compared to a 29.9% growth in Kazakhstan.
In 2004, Finland ranked 157th for population density and is in 173rd place now. Kazakhstan was 181st in 2004 and ranks 187th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 19.8 |
| 2023 | 47.6 | 19.5 |
| 2022 | 47.3 | 19.2 |
| 2021 | 47.2 | 18.9 |
| 2020 | 47.1 | 18.7 |
| 2019 | 47.1 | 18.4 |
| 2018 | 47 | 18.2 |
| 2017 | 46.9 | 17.9 |
| 2016 | 46.8 | 17.6 |
| 2015 | 46.7 | 17.3 |
| 2014 | 46.5 | 17.1 |
| 2013 | 46.4 | 16.8 |
| 2012 | 46.1 | 16.6 |
| 2011 | 45.9 | 16.4 |
| 2010 | 45.7 | 16.2 |
| 2009 | 45.5 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | 45.3 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 45 | 15.6 |
| 2006 | 44.9 | 15.4 |
| 2005 | 44.6 | 15.3 |
| 2004 | 44.5 | 15.2 |
| 2003 | 44.3 | 15.1 |
| 2002 | 44.2 | 15 |
| 2001 | 44.1 | 14.9 |
| 2000 | 44 | 14.9 |
| 1999 | 43.9 | 14.8 |
| 1998 | 43.8 | 15 |
| 1997 | 43.7 | 15.4 |
| 1996 | 43.6 | 15.7 |
| 1995 | 43.4 | 16.1 |
| 1994 | 43.3 | 16.4 |
| 1993 | 43.1 | 16.6 |
| 1992 | 42.9 | 16.6 |
| 1991 | 42.6 | - |
| 1990 | 42.4 | - |
| 1989 | 42.2 | - |
| 1988 | 42.1 | - |
| 1987 | 41.9 | - |
| 1986 | 41.8 | - |
| 1985 | 41.7 | - |
| 1984 | 41.5 | - |
| 1983 | 41.3 | - |
| 1982 | 41 | - |
| 1981 | 40.8 | - |
| 1980 | 40.6 | - |
| 1979 | 40.5 | - |
| 1978 | 40.4 | - |
| 1977 | 40.3 | - |
| 1976 | 40.2 | - |
| 1975 | 40.1 | - |
| 1974 | 39.9 | - |
| 1973 | 39.7 | - |
| 1972 | 39.5 | - |
| 1971 | 39.2 | - |
| 1970 | 39.2 | - |
| 1969 | 39.3 | - |
| 1968 | 39.3 | - |
| 1967 | 39.2 | - |
| 1966 | 39 | - |
| 1965 | 38.8 | - |
| 1964 | 38.7 | - |
| 1963 | 38.5 | - |
| 1962 | 38.2 | - |
| 1961 | 37.9 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
| 2024 | 85.9% | 58.4% |
| 2023 | 85.8% | 58.2% |
| 2022 | 85.7% | 58% |
| 2021 | 85.6% | 57.8% |
| 2020 | 85.5% | 57.7% |
| 2019 | 85.4% | 57.5% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | 57.4% |
| 2017 | 85.3% | 57.3% |
| 2016 | 85.3% | 57.3% |
| 2015 | 85.2% | 57.2% |
| 2014 | 85.2% | 57.1% |
| 2013 | 85.1% | 57% |
| 2012 | 84.8% | 57% |
| 2011 | 84.3% | 56.9% |
| 2010 | 83.8% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 83.4% | 56.8% |
| 2008 | 83.3% | 56.7% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | 56.6% |
| 2006 | 83% | 56.5% |
| 2005 | 82.9% | 56.5% |
| 2004 | 82.8% | 56.4% |
| 2003 | 82.6% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 82.5% | 56.2% |
| 2001 | 82.4% | 56.2% |
| 2000 | 82.2% | 56.1% |
| 1999 | 81.9% | 56% |
| 1998 | 81.7% | 56% |
| 1997 | 81.5% | 56% |
| 1996 | 81.2% | 55.9% |
| 1995 | 81% | 55.9% |
| 1994 | 80.7% | 55.9% |
| 1993 | 80.4% | 56% |
| 1992 | 80.1% | 56.1% |
| 1991 | 79.8% | 56.2% |
| 1990 | 79.4% | 56.3% |
| 1989 | 78.7% | 56.4% |
| 1988 | 78% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 77.3% | 56.2% |
| 1986 | 76.6% | 56.1% |
| 1985 | 75.8% | 56% |
| 1984 | 75% | 55.9% |
| 1983 | 74.2% | 55.5% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 55% |
| 1981 | 72.5% | 54.6% |
| 1980 | 71.7% | 54.1% |
| 1979 | 71% | 53.7% |
| 1978 | 70.2% | 53.4% |
| 1977 | 69.4% | 53.1% |
| 1976 | 68.6% | 52.8% |
| 1975 | 67.8% | 52.6% |
| 1974 | 67% | 52.3% |
| 1973 | 66.2% | 51.8% |
| 1972 | 65.4% | 51.3% |
| 1971 | 64.5% | 50.8% |
| 1970 | 63.7% | 50.2% |
| 1969 | 62.9% | 49.6% |
| 1968 | 62.1% | 49% |
| 1967 | 61.3% | 48.3% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 47.7% |
| 1965 | 59.7% | 47% |
| 1964 | 58.8% | 46.4% |
| 1963 | 58% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 57.2% | 45.3% |
| 1961 | 56.3% | 44.7% |
| 1960 | 55.3% | 44.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland and from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
