Finland has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 679 people in Jamaica. Finland has 646,303 sq ft of land per person vs 41,673 sq ft in Jamaica. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Finland and Jamaica are ranked 173rd and 41st, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Finland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.007% of the land area for Jamaica, hence the population density in Finland is 92.9% lower than in Jamaica.
Population density comparison
Finland
|
Jamaica
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 679 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 173/197 | 41/197 |
| Population |
5643254
|
2837071
|
| Land area | 117,360 sq mi | 4,181 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,393 sq ft | 41,059 sq ft |
| Rural population | 14.1% | 42.2% |
| Urban population | 85.9% | 57.8% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Finland vs Jamaica:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Finland increased by 8.05%, compared to a 6.25% growth in Jamaica.
In 2004, Finland ranked 157th for population density and is in 173rd place now. Jamaica was 36th in 2004 and ranks 41st out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Jamaica
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 679 |
| 2023 | 47.6 | 679 |
| 2022 | 47.3 | 679 |
| 2021 | 47.2 | 679 |
| 2020 | 47.1 | 677 |
| 2019 | 47.1 | 675 |
| 2018 | 47 | 674 |
| 2017 | 46.9 | 673 |
| 2016 | 46.8 | 672 |
| 2015 | 46.7 | 670 |
| 2014 | 46.5 | 668 |
| 2013 | 46.4 | 666 |
| 2012 | 46.1 | 663 |
| 2011 | 45.9 | 660 |
| 2010 | 45.7 | 657 |
| 2009 | 45.5 | 655 |
| 2008 | 45.3 | 652 |
| 2007 | 45 | 649 |
| 2006 | 44.9 | 646 |
| 2005 | 44.6 | 643 |
| 2004 | 44.5 | 639 |
| 2003 | 44.3 | 635 |
| 2002 | 44.2 | 631 |
| 2001 | 44.1 | 628 |
| 2000 | 44 | 624 |
| 1999 | 43.9 | 619 |
| 1998 | 43.8 | 615 |
| 1997 | 43.7 | 609 |
| 1996 | 43.6 | 604 |
| 1995 | 43.4 | 598 |
| 1994 | 43.3 | 592 |
| 1993 | 43.1 | 586 |
| 1992 | 42.9 | 580 |
| 1991 | 42.6 | 574 |
| 1990 | 42.4 | 569 |
| 1989 | 42.2 | 565 |
| 1988 | 42.1 | 561 |
| 1987 | 41.9 | 557 |
| 1986 | 41.8 | 553 |
| 1985 | 41.7 | 548 |
| 1984 | 41.5 | 542 |
| 1983 | 41.3 | 534 |
| 1982 | 41 | 527 |
| 1981 | 40.8 | 520 |
| 1980 | 40.6 | 513 |
| 1979 | 40.5 | 507 |
| 1978 | 40.4 | 501 |
| 1977 | 40.3 | 495 |
| 1976 | 40.2 | 489 |
| 1975 | 40.1 | 483 |
| 1974 | 39.9 | 476 |
| 1973 | 39.7 | 469 |
| 1972 | 39.5 | 462 |
| 1971 | 39.2 | 455 |
| 1970 | 39.2 | 449 |
| 1969 | 39.3 | 444 |
| 1968 | 39.3 | 439 |
| 1967 | 39.2 | 434 |
| 1966 | 39 | 428 |
| 1965 | 38.8 | 423 |
| 1964 | 38.7 | 417 |
| 1963 | 38.5 | 412 |
| 1962 | 38.2 | 406 |
| 1961 | 37.9 | 400 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Jamaica
|
|
| 2024 | 85.9% | 57.8% |
| 2023 | 85.8% | 57.4% |
| 2022 | 85.7% | 57% |
| 2021 | 85.6% | 56.7% |
| 2020 | 85.5% | 56.3% |
| 2019 | 85.4% | 56% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | 55.7% |
| 2017 | 85.3% | 55.4% |
| 2016 | 85.3% | 55.1% |
| 2015 | 85.2% | 54.8% |
| 2014 | 85.2% | 54.6% |
| 2013 | 85.1% | 54.4% |
| 2012 | 84.8% | 54.1% |
| 2011 | 84.3% | 53.9% |
| 2010 | 83.8% | 53.7% |
| 2009 | 83.4% | 53.6% |
| 2008 | 83.3% | 53.4% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | 53.2% |
| 2006 | 83% | 53% |
| 2005 | 82.9% | 52.8% |
| 2004 | 82.8% | 52.6% |
| 2003 | 82.6% | 52.4% |
| 2002 | 82.5% | 52.3% |
| 2001 | 82.4% | 52.1% |
| 2000 | 82.2% | 51.8% |
| 1999 | 81.9% | 51.6% |
| 1998 | 81.7% | 51.3% |
| 1997 | 81.5% | 51.1% |
| 1996 | 81.2% | 50.9% |
| 1995 | 81% | 50.6% |
| 1994 | 80.7% | 50.4% |
| 1993 | 80.4% | 50.1% |
| 1992 | 80.1% | 49.9% |
| 1991 | 79.8% | 49.7% |
| 1990 | 79.4% | 49.4% |
| 1989 | 78.7% | 49.2% |
| 1988 | 78% | 49% |
| 1987 | 77.3% | 48.8% |
| 1986 | 76.6% | 48.6% |
| 1985 | 75.8% | 48.4% |
| 1984 | 75% | 48.2% |
| 1983 | 74.2% | 48% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 47.8% |
| 1981 | 72.5% | 47.3% |
| 1980 | 71.7% | 46.7% |
| 1979 | 71% | 46.2% |
| 1978 | 70.2% | 45.6% |
| 1977 | 69.4% | 45.1% |
| 1976 | 68.6% | 44.6% |
| 1975 | 67.8% | 44% |
| 1974 | 67% | 43.5% |
| 1973 | 66.2% | 42.9% |
| 1972 | 65.4% | 42.4% |
| 1971 | 64.5% | 41.9% |
| 1970 | 63.7% | 41.3% |
| 1969 | 62.9% | 40.6% |
| 1968 | 62.1% | 39.8% |
| 1967 | 61.3% | 39% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 38.3% |
| 1965 | 59.7% | 37.5% |
| 1964 | 58.8% | 36.7% |
| 1963 | 58% | 36% |
| 1962 | 57.2% | 35.2% |
| 1961 | 56.3% | 34.5% |
| 1960 | 55.3% | 33.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland and from 52.6% to 57.8% in Jamaica.
Densely populated cities
|
Finland
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Helsinki | 687K |
| Espoo | 315K |
| Tampere | 255K |
| Oulu | 215K |
| Turku | 206K |
| Lahti | 121K |
| Kouvola | 78.8K |
| Lappeenranta | 73K |
| Vaasa | 69K |
| Seinajoki | 66.3K |
|
Jamaica
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kingston | 580K |
| Spanish Town | 131K |
| Montego Bay | 124K |
| Half Way Tree | 96.5K |
| May Pen | 61.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
