Finland has a population density of 48 people per square mile compared to 87.2 people in Laos. Finland has 646,303 sq ft of land per person vs 328,051 sq ft in Laos. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Finland and Laos are ranked 173rd and 150th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Finland has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.2% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.1% of the population and 0.15% of the land area for Laos, hence the population density in Finland is 44.9% lower than in Laos.
Population density comparison
Finland
|
Laos
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 48 ppl/mi² | 87.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 173/197 | 150/197 |
| Population |
5643254
|
7954155
|
| Land area | 117,360 sq mi | 89,112 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 580,393 sq ft | 319,739 sq ft |
| Rural population | 14.1% | 61.1% |
| Urban population | 85.9% | 38.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Finland vs Laos:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Finland increased by 8.05%, compared to a 34.4% growth in Laos.
In 2004, Finland ranked 157th for population density and is in 173rd place now. Laos was 150th in 2004 and still ranks 150th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Laos
|
|
| 2024 | 48 | 87.2 |
| 2023 | 47.6 | 86 |
| 2022 | 47.3 | 84.8 |
| 2021 | 47.2 | 83.6 |
| 2020 | 47.1 | 82.4 |
| 2019 | 47.1 | 81.2 |
| 2018 | 47 | 80 |
| 2017 | 46.9 | 78.8 |
| 2016 | 46.8 | 77.5 |
| 2015 | 46.7 | 76.3 |
| 2014 | 46.5 | 75.2 |
| 2013 | 46.4 | 74.2 |
| 2012 | 46.1 | 73.2 |
| 2011 | 45.9 | 72.1 |
| 2010 | 45.7 | 71.1 |
| 2009 | 45.5 | 70 |
| 2008 | 45.3 | 69 |
| 2007 | 45 | 68 |
| 2006 | 44.9 | 66.9 |
| 2005 | 44.6 | 65.9 |
| 2004 | 44.5 | 64.9 |
| 2003 | 44.3 | 63.9 |
| 2002 | 44.2 | 63 |
| 2001 | 44.1 | 62 |
| 2000 | 44 | 60.9 |
| 1999 | 43.9 | 59.9 |
| 1998 | 43.8 | 58.9 |
| 1997 | 43.7 | 57.8 |
| 1996 | 43.6 | 56.6 |
| 1995 | 43.4 | 55.3 |
| 1994 | 43.3 | 54 |
| 1993 | 43.1 | 52.6 |
| 1992 | 42.9 | 51.2 |
| 1991 | 42.6 | 49.8 |
| 1990 | 42.4 | 48.4 |
| 1989 | 42.2 | 47 |
| 1988 | 42.1 | 45.7 |
| 1987 | 41.9 | 44.4 |
| 1986 | 41.8 | 43.2 |
| 1985 | 41.7 | 42 |
| 1984 | 41.5 | 40.8 |
| 1983 | 41.3 | 39.7 |
| 1982 | 41 | 38.7 |
| 1981 | 40.8 | 37.8 |
| 1980 | 40.6 | 36.9 |
| 1979 | 40.5 | 36.2 |
| 1978 | 40.4 | 35.6 |
| 1977 | 40.3 | 35 |
| 1976 | 40.2 | 34.4 |
| 1975 | 40.1 | 33.7 |
| 1974 | 39.9 | 33 |
| 1973 | 39.7 | 32.2 |
| 1972 | 39.5 | 31.4 |
| 1971 | 39.2 | 30.7 |
| 1970 | 39.2 | 30 |
| 1969 | 39.3 | 29.3 |
| 1968 | 39.3 | 28.6 |
| 1967 | 39.2 | 27.9 |
| 1966 | 39 | 27.3 |
| 1965 | 38.8 | 26.7 |
| 1964 | 38.7 | 26.1 |
| 1963 | 38.5 | 25.5 |
| 1962 | 38.2 | 24.9 |
| 1961 | 37.9 | 24.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Finland
|
Laos
|
|
| 2024 | 85.9% | 38.9% |
| 2023 | 85.8% | 38.2% |
| 2022 | 85.7% | 37.6% |
| 2021 | 85.6% | 36.9% |
| 2020 | 85.5% | 36.3% |
| 2019 | 85.4% | 35.6% |
| 2018 | 85.4% | 35% |
| 2017 | 85.3% | 34.4% |
| 2016 | 85.3% | 33.7% |
| 2015 | 85.2% | 33.1% |
| 2014 | 85.2% | 32.5% |
| 2013 | 85.1% | 31.9% |
| 2012 | 84.8% | 31.3% |
| 2011 | 84.3% | 30.7% |
| 2010 | 83.8% | 30.1% |
| 2009 | 83.4% | 29.5% |
| 2008 | 83.3% | 28.9% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | 28.3% |
| 2006 | 83% | 27.7% |
| 2005 | 82.9% | 27.2% |
| 2004 | 82.8% | 26.2% |
| 2003 | 82.6% | 25.1% |
| 2002 | 82.5% | 24% |
| 2001 | 82.4% | 23% |
| 2000 | 82.2% | 22% |
| 1999 | 81.9% | 21% |
| 1998 | 81.7% | 20% |
| 1997 | 81.5% | 19.1% |
| 1996 | 81.2% | 18.2% |
| 1995 | 81% | 17.4% |
| 1994 | 80.7% | 16.9% |
| 1993 | 80.4% | 16.5% |
| 1992 | 80.1% | 16.1% |
| 1991 | 79.8% | 15.8% |
| 1990 | 79.4% | 15.4% |
| 1989 | 78.7% | 15.1% |
| 1988 | 78% | 14.8% |
| 1987 | 77.3% | 14.4% |
| 1986 | 76.6% | 14.1% |
| 1985 | 75.8% | 13.8% |
| 1984 | 75% | 13.5% |
| 1983 | 74.2% | 13.2% |
| 1982 | 73.4% | 12.9% |
| 1981 | 72.5% | 12.7% |
| 1980 | 71.7% | 12.4% |
| 1979 | 71% | 12.1% |
| 1978 | 70.2% | 11.8% |
| 1977 | 69.4% | 11.6% |
| 1976 | 68.6% | 11.3% |
| 1975 | 67.8% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 67% | 10.8% |
| 1973 | 66.2% | 10.6% |
| 1972 | 65.4% | 10.3% |
| 1971 | 64.5% | 9.95% |
| 1970 | 63.7% | 9.63% |
| 1969 | 62.9% | 9.3% |
| 1968 | 62.1% | 8.99% |
| 1967 | 61.3% | 8.69% |
| 1966 | 60.5% | 8.4% |
| 1965 | 59.7% | 8.32% |
| 1964 | 58.8% | 8.25% |
| 1963 | 58% | 8.17% |
| 1962 | 57.2% | 8.1% |
| 1961 | 56.3% | 8.02% |
| 1960 | 55.3% | 7.95% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 82.8% to 85.9% in Finland and from 26.2% to 38.9% in Laos.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
