Angola has a population density of 78.7 people per square mile compared to 3,458 people in Bangladesh. Angola has 354,205 sq ft of land per person vs 9,152 sq ft in Bangladesh. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Angola and Bangladesh are ranked 153rd and 7th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Angola has 0.47% of the world's population and 0.84% of the land area of all countries, compared to 2.13% of the population and 0.09% of the land area for Bangladesh, hence the population density in Angola is 97.7% lower than in Bangladesh.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 78.7 ppl/mi² | 3,458 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 153/197 | 7/197 |
| Population |
39983997
|
177398795
|
| Land area | 481,354 sq mi | 50,186 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 354,205 sq ft | 8,061 sq ft |
| Rural population | 30.7% | 58.8% |
| Urban population | 69.3% | 41.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.57% | 11.2% |
Angola vs Bangladesh:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Angola increased by 103.7%, compared to a 21.6% growth in Bangladesh.
In 2004, Angola ranked 164th for population density and is in 153rd place now. Bangladesh was 6th in 2004 and ranks 7th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 78.7 | 3,458 |
| 2023 | 76.3 | 3,417 |
| 2022 | 74 | 3,368 |
| 2021 | 71.7 | 3,336 |
| 2020 | 69.5 | 3,309 |
| 2019 | 67.3 | 3,281 |
| 2018 | 65 | 3,254 |
| 2017 | 62.8 | 3,227 |
| 2016 | 60.6 | 3,200 |
| 2015 | 58.5 | 3,171 |
| 2014 | 56.4 | 3,143 |
| 2013 | 54.4 | 3,115 |
| 2012 | 52.3 | 3,085 |
| 2011 | 50.3 | 3,056 |
| 2010 | 48.4 | 3,028 |
| 2009 | 46.6 | 3,002 |
| 2008 | 44.8 | 2,974 |
| 2007 | 43.2 | 2,945 |
| 2006 | 41.6 | 2,913 |
| 2005 | 40.1 | 2,879 |
| 2004 | 38.6 | 2,843 |
| 2003 | 37.3 | 2,805 |
| 2002 | 36 | 2,764 |
| 2001 | 34.8 | 2,722 |
| 2000 | 33.6 | 2,677 |
| 1999 | 32.5 | 2,629 |
| 1998 | 31.5 | 2,579 |
| 1997 | 30.5 | 2,531 |
| 1996 | 29.4 | 2,484 |
| 1995 | 28.5 | 2,439 |
| 1994 | 27.5 | 2,394 |
| 1993 | 26.6 | 2,350 |
| 1992 | 25.8 | 2,307 |
| 1991 | 25 | 2,264 |
| 1990 | 24.2 | 2,221 |
| 1989 | 23.3 | 2,177 |
| 1988 | 22.6 | 2,133 |
| 1987 | 21.8 | 2,088 |
| 1986 | 21.1 | 2,042 |
| 1985 | 20.3 | 1,995 |
| 1984 | 19.6 | 1,946 |
| 1983 | 18.9 | 1,897 |
| 1982 | 18.2 | 1,847 |
| 1981 | 17.5 | 1,797 |
| 1980 | 16.9 | 1,751 |
| 1979 | 16.3 | 1,710 |
| 1978 | 15.7 | 1,669 |
| 1977 | 15.2 | 1,629 |
| 1976 | 14.7 | 1,589 |
| 1975 | 14.2 | 1,549 |
| 1974 | 13.7 | 1,509 |
| 1973 | 13.3 | 1,467 |
| 1972 | 12.8 | 1,425 |
| 1971 | 12.4 | 1,398 |
| 1970 | 12.2 | 1,374 |
| 1969 | 12 | 1,339 |
| 1968 | 11.8 | 1,301 |
| 1967 | 11.7 | 1,264 |
| 1966 | 11.6 | 1,227 |
| 1965 | 11.5 | 1,192 |
| 1964 | 11.4 | 1,158 |
| 1963 | 11.2 | 1,124 |
| 1962 | 11.1 | 1,092 |
| 1961 | 11 | 1,061 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 69.3% | 41.2% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 40.5% |
| 2022 | 68.1% | 39.7% |
| 2021 | 67.5% | 38.9% |
| 2020 | 66.8% | 38.2% |
| 2019 | 66.2% | 37.4% |
| 2018 | 65.5% | 36.6% |
| 2017 | 64.8% | 35.9% |
| 2016 | 64.1% | 35.1% |
| 2015 | 63.4% | 34.3% |
| 2014 | 62.7% | 33.5% |
| 2013 | 62% | 32.8% |
| 2012 | 61.3% | 32% |
| 2011 | 60.5% | 31.2% |
| 2010 | 59.8% | 30.5% |
| 2009 | 59% | 29.7% |
| 2008 | 58.3% | 29% |
| 2007 | 57.5% | 28.2% |
| 2006 | 56.8% | 27.5% |
| 2005 | 56% | 26.8% |
| 2004 | 54.8% | 26.1% |
| 2003 | 53.6% | 25.4% |
| 2002 | 52.5% | 24.8% |
| 2001 | 51.3% | 24.1% |
| 2000 | 50.1% | 23.6% |
| 1999 | 48.9% | 23.2% |
| 1998 | 47.7% | 22.8% |
| 1997 | 46.5% | 22.4% |
| 1996 | 45.3% | 22.1% |
| 1995 | 44.2% | 21.7% |
| 1994 | 43% | 21.3% |
| 1993 | 41.5% | 21% |
| 1992 | 40% | 20.6% |
| 1991 | 38.6% | 20.3% |
| 1990 | 37.1% | 19.8% |
| 1989 | 35.7% | 19.3% |
| 1988 | 34.3% | 18.9% |
| 1987 | 33% | 18.4% |
| 1986 | 31.6% | 17.9% |
| 1985 | 30.3% | 17.5% |
| 1984 | 29.1% | 17.1% |
| 1983 | 27.8% | 16.6% |
| 1982 | 26.6% | 16.2% |
| 1981 | 25.4% | 15.8% |
| 1980 | 24.3% | 14.9% |
| 1979 | 23.2% | 13.7% |
| 1978 | 22.1% | 12.6% |
| 1977 | 21.1% | 11.6% |
| 1976 | 20.1% | 10.7% |
| 1975 | 19.1% | 9.84% |
| 1974 | 18.2% | 9.03% |
| 1973 | 17.3% | 8.55% |
| 1972 | 16.5% | 8.22% |
| 1971 | 15.6% | 7.9% |
| 1970 | 15% | 7.59% |
| 1969 | 14.4% | 7.3% |
| 1968 | 13.9% | 7.01% |
| 1967 | 13.4% | 6.73% |
| 1966 | 13% | 6.47% |
| 1965 | 12.5% | 6.21% |
| 1964 | 12.1% | 5.96% |
| 1963 | 11.6% | 5.73% |
| 1962 | 11.2% | 5.5% |
| 1961 | 10.8% | 5.28% |
| 1960 | 10.4% | 5.14% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 54.8% to 69.3% in Angola and from 26.1% to 41.2% in Bangladesh.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Dhaka | 16.8M |
| Chittagong | 2.58M |
| Narayanganj | 968K |
| Khulna | 929K |
| Sylhet | 480K |
| Rajshahi | 448K |
| Bogra | 401K |
| Barisal | 328K |
| Rangpur | 294K |
| Brahmanbaria | 268K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons