Andorra has a population density of 462 people per square mile compared to 83.6 people in Angola. Andorra has 61,480 sq ft of land per person vs 354,205 sq ft in Angola. Andorra and Angola rank 59th and 153rd by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Andorra has 0.001% of the world's population and 0.0003% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.47% of the population and 0.84% of the land area for Angola, making the population density in Andorra 453% higher than in Angola.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Andorra
|
Angola
|
|
| 2026 | 462 | 83.6 |
| 2025 | 457 | 81.1 |
| 2024 | 452 | 78.7 |
| 2023 | 446 | 76.3 |
| 2022 | 439 | 74 |
| 2021 | 432 | 71.7 |
| 2020 | 426 | 69.5 |
| 2019 | 421 | 67.3 |
| 2018 | 414 | 65 |
| 2017 | 406 | 62.8 |
| 2016 | 398 | 60.6 |
| 2015 | 398 | 58.5 |
| 2014 | 406 | 56.4 |
| 2013 | 414 | 54.4 |
| 2012 | 423 | 52.3 |
| 2011 | 429 | 50.3 |
| 2010 | 445 | 48.4 |
| 2009 | 462 | 46.6 |
| 2008 | 460 | 44.8 |
| 2007 | 451 | 43.2 |
| 2006 | 439 | 41.6 |
| 2005 | 427 | 40.1 |
| 2004 | 410 | 38.6 |
| 2003 | 383 | 37.3 |
| 2002 | 366 | 36 |
| 2001 | 363 | 34.8 |
| 2000 | 362 | 33.6 |
| 1999 | 362 | 32.5 |
| 1998 | 360 | 31.5 |
| 1997 | 357 | 30.5 |
| 1996 | 353 | 29.4 |
| 1995 | 352 | 28.5 |
| 1994 | 356 | 27.5 |
| 1993 | 349 | 26.6 |
| 1992 | 332 | 25.8 |
| 1991 | 312 | 25 |
| 1990 | 289.8 | 24.2 |
| 1989 | 278.9 | 23.3 |
| 1988 | 272.3 | 22.6 |
| 1987 | 262.6 | 21.8 |
| 1986 | 252 | 21.1 |
| 1985 | 241.5 | 20.3 |
| 1984 | 233 | 19.6 |
| 1983 | 223.5 | 18.9 |
| 1982 | 213.6 | 18.2 |
| 1981 | 204.8 | 17.5 |
| 1980 | 197.2 | 16.9 |
| 1979 | 189 | 16.3 |
| 1978 | 180.4 | 15.7 |
| 1977 | 171.4 | 15.2 |
| 1976 | 162.2 | 14.7 |
| 1975 | 153 | 14.2 |
| 1974 | 144 | 13.7 |
| 1973 | 135.1 | 13.3 |
| 1972 | 126.5 | 12.8 |
| 1971 | 118.2 | 12.4 |
| 1970 | 110.1 | 12.2 |
| 1969 | 102.2 | 12 |
| 1968 | 94.7 | 11.8 |
| 1967 | 87.3 | 11.7 |
| 1966 | 80.6 | 11.6 |
| 1965 | 75.1 | 11.5 |
| 1964 | 70.3 | 11.4 |
| 1963 | 65.7 | 11.2 |
| 1962 | 61.1 | 11.1 |
| 1961 | 56.7 | 11 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/andorra/angola | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Andorra increased by 5.4%, compared to a 101% growth in Angola.
In 2006, Andorra ranked 52nd by population density and is 59th now. Angola was 165th in 2006 and ranks 153rd out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Andorra
|
Angola
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 462 ppl/mi² | 83.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 59/197 | 153/197 |
| Population |
84102
|
40555924
|
| Land area | 181.5 sq mi | 481,354 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 61,742 sq ft | 354,205 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11.1% | 29.3% |
| Urban population | 88.9% | 70.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 6.13% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Andorra
|
Angola
|
|
| 2024 | 88.9% | 70.7% |
| 2023 | 88.8% | 69.9% |
| 2022 | 88.8% | 69.1% |
| 2021 | 88.7% | 68.3% |
| 2020 | 88.6% | 67.5% |
| 2019 | 88.5% | 66.7% |
| 2018 | 88.5% | 65.9% |
| 2017 | 88.5% | 65.1% |
| 2016 | 88.5% | 64.3% |
| 2015 | 88.5% | 63.5% |
| 2014 | 88.5% | 62.7% |
| 2013 | 88.6% | 62.1% |
| 2012 | 88.6% | 61.5% |
| 2011 | 88.7% | 60.8% |
| 2010 | 88.8% | 60.1% |
| 2009 | 88.8% | 59.4% |
| 2008 | 88.9% | 58.6% |
| 2007 | 89% | 57.8% |
| 2006 | 89.4% | 56.9% |
| 2005 | 90% | 56% |
| 2004 | 90.5% | 55% |
| 2003 | 91% | 54% |
| 2002 | 91.5% | 52.9% |
| 2001 | 91.9% | 51.7% |
| 2000 | 92.3% | 50.5% |
| 1999 | 92.5% | 49.3% |
| 1998 | 92.8% | 48% |
| 1997 | 93% | 46.7% |
| 1996 | 93.2% | 45.5% |
| 1995 | 93.4% | 44.2% |
| 1994 | 93.5% | 43% |
| 1993 | 93.8% | 41.8% |
| 1992 | 94% | 40.5% |
| 1991 | 94.3% | 39.2% |
| 1990 | 94.8% | 37.9% |
| 1989 | 95.3% | 36.5% |
| 1988 | 95.3% | 35.1% |
| 1987 | 95.4% | 33.7% |
| 1986 | 95.4% | 32.3% |
| 1985 | 95.4% | 30.9% |
| 1984 | 95.3% | 29.5% |
| 1983 | 95% | 28.1% |
| 1982 | 94.5% | 26.8% |
| 1981 | 93.8% | 25.4% |
| 1980 | 92.9% | 24.1% |
| 1979 | 91.9% | 22.9% |
| 1978 | 90.8% | 21.7% |
| 1977 | 89.5% | 20.5% |
| 1976 | 88% | 19.4% |
| 1975 | 86.5% | 18.4% |
| 1974 | 84.9% | 17.4% |
| 1973 | 83.2% | 16.5% |
| 1972 | 81.4% | 15.8% |
| 1971 | 79.6% | 15.1% |
| 1970 | 77.7% | 14.5% |
| 1969 | 75.7% | 14% |
| 1968 | 73.7% | 13.5% |
| 1967 | 71.8% | 13.1% |
| 1966 | 69.8% | 12.7% |
| 1965 | 67.8% | 12.3% |
| 1964 | 65.8% | 11.9% |
| 1963 | 63.9% | 11.6% |
| 1962 | 62% | 11.2% |
| 1961 | 60.2% | 10.8% |
| 1960 | 58.5% | 10.4% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/andorra/angola | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 90.5% to 88.9% in Andorra and from 55% to 70.7% in Angola.
Densely populated cities
|
Angola
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Luanda | 2.49M |
| Huambo | 844K |
| Cabinda | 739K |
| Benguela | 562K |
| Lobito | 436K |
| Luena | 357K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/andorra/angola | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2014–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.