Guatemala has a population density of 445 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. Guatemala has 63,678 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Guatemala and New Zealand are ranked 60th and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Guatemala has 0.23% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in Guatemala is 747% higher than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
Guatemala
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 445 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 60/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
18912872
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 41,375 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 62,666 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 46.5% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 53.5% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.59% | 27.5% |
Guatemala vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Guatemala increased by 43.7%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, Guatemala ranked 64th for population density and is in 60th place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 445 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 438 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 431 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 425 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 420 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 413 | 49 |
| 2018 | 407 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 400 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 393 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 386 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 379 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 372 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 365 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 358 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 350 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 344 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 337 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 330 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 323 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 316 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 310 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 303 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 296 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 289.3 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 282.7 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 276.1 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 269.2 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 262.4 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 255.8 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 249.3 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 242.8 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 236.4 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 230.1 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | 224.1 | 34.4 |
| 1990 | 218.1 | 32.8 |
| 1989 | 212.1 | 32.5 |
| 1988 | 206.2 | 32.3 |
| 1987 | 200.5 | 32.2 |
| 1986 | 195.1 | 31.9 |
| 1985 | 189.7 | 31.9 |
| 1984 | 184.4 | 31.7 |
| 1983 | 179.3 | 31.5 |
| 1982 | 175 | 31 |
| 1981 | 171 | 30.7 |
| 1980 | 166.8 | 30.6 |
| 1979 | 162.6 | 30.6 |
| 1978 | 158.6 | 30.7 |
| 1977 | 154.7 | 30.7 |
| 1976 | 151.4 | 30.6 |
| 1975 | 148.1 | 30.3 |
| 1974 | 144.6 | 29.7 |
| 1973 | 140.9 | 29.1 |
| 1972 | 137.4 | 28.6 |
| 1971 | 133.9 | 28.1 |
| 1970 | 130.4 | 27.6 |
| 1969 | 127.1 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 123.7 | 27 |
| 1967 | 120.3 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 117 | 26.3 |
| 1965 | 113.7 | 25.9 |
| 1964 | 110.5 | 25.4 |
| 1963 | 107.3 | 24.9 |
| 1962 | 104.2 | 24.4 |
| 1961 | 101.2 | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
New Zealand
|
|
| 2024 | 53.5% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 53.1% | 87% |
| 2022 | 52.7% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 52.2% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 51.8% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 51.4% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 51.1% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 50.7% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 50.3% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 50% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 49.6% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 49% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 48.7% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 48.4% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 48.1% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 47.8% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 47.5% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 47.2% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 46.9% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 46.6% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 46.3% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 46% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 45.7% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 45.3% | 86% |
| 1999 | 45% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 44.7% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 44.3% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 44% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 43.7% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 43.3% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 43% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 42.7% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 42.3% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 42% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 41.7% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 41.3% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 41% | 84% |
| 1986 | 40.7% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 40.3% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 40% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 39.7% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 39.4% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 39% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 38.7% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 38.4% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 38.1% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 37.8% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 37.4% | 83% |
| 1975 | 37.1% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 36.5% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 36.2% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 35.9% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 35.5% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 35.2% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 34.9% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 34.6% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 34.3% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 34% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 33.7% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 32.4% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 31.8% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 31.1% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 46.6% to 53.5% in Guatemala and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
Guatemala
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guatemala | 1.21M |
| Mixco | 528K |
| Coban | 229K |
| Quetzaltenango | 208K |
| Jalapa | 193K |
| San Miguel Petapa | 151K |
| Momostenango | 140K |
| Mazatenango | 83.8K |
|
New Zealand
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
