Mozambique has a population density of 114.1 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. Mozambique has 249,142 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mozambique and New Zealand are ranked 144th and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mozambique has 0.43% of the world's population and 0.53% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in Mozambique is 117.2% higher than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 114.1 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 144/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
36441519
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 303,623 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 244,415 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 60.7% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 39.3% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.25% | 27.5% |
Mozambique vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mozambique increased by 74.6%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, Mozambique ranked 148th for population density and is in 144th place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 114.1 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 110.8 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 107.6 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 104.4 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 101.4 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 98.4 | 49 |
| 2018 | 95.6 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 92.8 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 90 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 87.4 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 84.9 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 82.5 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 80.2 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 77.9 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 75.7 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 73.7 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 71.9 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 70.1 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 68.5 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 66.9 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 65.3 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 63.9 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 62.4 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 61.1 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 59.7 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 58.4 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 57.1 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 55.8 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 54.3 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 52.6 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 49.5 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 46.3 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 44.8 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | 44 | 34.4 |
| 1990 | 43.1 | 32.8 |
| 1989 | 42.5 | 32.5 |
| 1988 | 42.2 | 32.3 |
| 1987 | 42.2 | 32.2 |
| 1986 | 42.1 | 31.9 |
| 1985 | 41.3 | 31.9 |
| 1984 | 40.6 | 31.7 |
| 1983 | 39.8 | 31.5 |
| 1982 | 38.9 | 31 |
| 1981 | 38.1 | 30.7 |
| 1980 | 37.3 | 30.6 |
| 1979 | 36.3 | 30.6 |
| 1978 | 35 | 30.7 |
| 1977 | 33.7 | 30.7 |
| 1976 | 32.5 | 30.6 |
| 1975 | 31.4 | 30.3 |
| 1974 | 30.4 | 29.7 |
| 1973 | 29.5 | 29.1 |
| 1972 | 28.6 | 28.6 |
| 1971 | 27.9 | 28.1 |
| 1970 | 27.2 | 27.6 |
| 1969 | 26.6 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 26 | 27 |
| 1967 | 25.4 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 24.9 | 26.3 |
| 1965 | 24.4 | 25.9 |
| 1964 | 23.9 | 25.4 |
| 1963 | 23.4 | 24.9 |
| 1962 | 23 | 24.4 |
| 1961 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 39.3% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 38.8% | 87% |
| 2022 | 38.2% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 37.6% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 37.1% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 36.5% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 36% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 35.5% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 34.9% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 34.4% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 33.9% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 33.4% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 32.8% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 32.3% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 31.8% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 31.3% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 30.8% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 30.4% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 30.2% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 30% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 29.6% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 29.5% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 29.3% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 29.1% | 86% |
| 1999 | 28.9% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 28.7% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 28.5% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 28% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 27.5% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 27% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 26.5% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 26% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 25.5% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 25% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 23.5% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 22.2% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 20.8% | 84% |
| 1986 | 19.5% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 17.2% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 16.1% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 15% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 14.1% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 13.2% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 12.7% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 12.2% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 11.7% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 11.3% | 83% |
| 1975 | 10.9% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 10.5% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 10.1% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 9.67% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 9.3% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 8.99% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 8.75% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 8.52% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 8.3% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 8.07% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 7.86% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 7.65% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 7.45% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 7.25% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 7.05% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 6.87% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 39.3% in Mozambique and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Maputo | 1.13M |
| Matola | 1.03M |
| Nampula | 743K |
| Beira | 531K |
| Quelimane | 350K |
| Chimoio | 239K |
| Nacala | 225K |
| Tete | 153K |
| Pemba | 141K |
| Xai-Xai | 116K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons