Mauritania has a population density of 13 people per square mile compared to 52.5 people in New Zealand. Mauritania has 2,146,163 sq ft of land per person vs 540,405 sq ft in New Zealand. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mauritania and New Zealand are ranked 188th and 168th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mauritania has 0.06% of the world's population and 0.69% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.18% of the land area for New Zealand, hence the population density in Mauritania is 75.3% lower than in New Zealand.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 13 ppl/mi² | 52.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 188/197 | 168/197 |
| Population |
5432542
|
5406623
|
| Land area | 397,955 sq mi | 101,665 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 2,146,163 sq ft | 530,907 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.5% | 12.9% |
| Urban population | 58.5% | 87.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 20.8% | 27.5% |
Mauritania vs New Zealand:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mauritania increased by 80.2%, compared to a 30.6% growth in New Zealand.
In 2004, Mauritania ranked 189th for population density and is in 188th place now. New Zealand was 162nd in 2004 and ranks 168th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 13 | 52.5 |
| 2023 | 12.6 | 51.6 |
| 2022 | 12.3 | 50.3 |
| 2021 | 11.9 | 50.3 |
| 2020 | 11.6 | 50.1 |
| 2019 | 11.2 | 49 |
| 2018 | 10.9 | 48.2 |
| 2017 | 10.6 | 47.3 |
| 2016 | 10.3 | 46.4 |
| 2015 | 9.97 | 45.3 |
| 2014 | 9.67 | 44.4 |
| 2013 | 9.38 | 43.7 |
| 2012 | 9.09 | 43.4 |
| 2011 | 8.8 | 43.1 |
| 2010 | 8.52 | 42.8 |
| 2009 | 8.25 | 42.3 |
| 2008 | 8 | 41.9 |
| 2007 | 7.77 | 41.5 |
| 2006 | 7.57 | 41.2 |
| 2005 | 7.39 | 40.7 |
| 2004 | 7.21 | 40.2 |
| 2003 | 7.04 | 39.6 |
| 2002 | 6.88 | 38.8 |
| 2001 | 6.73 | 38.2 |
| 2000 | 6.57 | 37.9 |
| 1999 | 6.39 | 37.7 |
| 1998 | 6.22 | 37.5 |
| 1997 | 6.06 | 37.2 |
| 1996 | 5.93 | 36.7 |
| 1995 | 5.81 | 36.1 |
| 1994 | 5.65 | 35.6 |
| 1993 | 5.46 | 35.1 |
| 1992 | 5.25 | 34.7 |
| 1991 | 5.05 | 34.4 |
| 1990 | 4.9 | 32.8 |
| 1989 | 4.78 | 32.5 |
| 1988 | 4.66 | 32.3 |
| 1987 | 4.53 | 32.2 |
| 1986 | 4.4 | 31.9 |
| 1985 | 4.28 | 31.9 |
| 1984 | 4.16 | 31.7 |
| 1983 | 4.04 | 31.5 |
| 1982 | 3.92 | 31 |
| 1981 | 3.81 | 30.7 |
| 1980 | 3.7 | 30.6 |
| 1979 | 3.6 | 30.6 |
| 1978 | 3.5 | 30.7 |
| 1977 | 3.4 | 30.7 |
| 1976 | 3.31 | 30.6 |
| 1975 | 3.21 | 30.3 |
| 1974 | 3.12 | 29.7 |
| 1973 | 3.03 | 29.1 |
| 1972 | 2.94 | 28.6 |
| 1971 | 2.85 | 28.1 |
| 1970 | 2.76 | 27.6 |
| 1969 | 2.68 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 2.6 | 27 |
| 1967 | 2.52 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 2.45 | 26.3 |
| 1965 | 2.38 | 25.9 |
| 1964 | 2.31 | 25.4 |
| 1963 | 2.25 | 24.9 |
| 1962 | 2.18 | 24.4 |
| 1961 | 2.13 | 23.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 58.5% | 87.1% |
| 2023 | 57.7% | 87% |
| 2022 | 56.9% | 86.9% |
| 2021 | 56.1% | 86.8% |
| 2020 | 55.3% | 86.7% |
| 2019 | 54.5% | 86.6% |
| 2018 | 53.7% | 86.5% |
| 2017 | 52.8% | 86.5% |
| 2016 | 52% | 86.4% |
| 2015 | 51.1% | 86.3% |
| 2014 | 50.2% | 86.3% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 86.2% |
| 2012 | 48.4% | 86.2% |
| 2011 | 47.5% | 86.1% |
| 2010 | 46.6% | 86.2% |
| 2009 | 45.7% | 86.2% |
| 2008 | 44.8% | 86.3% |
| 2007 | 43.9% | 86.3% |
| 2006 | 43% | 86.4% |
| 2005 | 42.1% | 86.3% |
| 2004 | 41.2% | 86.3% |
| 2003 | 40.4% | 86.2% |
| 2002 | 39.5% | 86.2% |
| 2001 | 38.6% | 86.1% |
| 2000 | 38.1% | 86% |
| 1999 | 38.2% | 85.9% |
| 1998 | 38.3% | 85.9% |
| 1997 | 38.5% | 85.8% |
| 1996 | 38.6% | 85.7% |
| 1995 | 38.7% | 85.6% |
| 1994 | 38.8% | 85.4% |
| 1993 | 39% | 85.3% |
| 1992 | 39.1% | 85.1% |
| 1991 | 39.2% | 84.9% |
| 1990 | 39.3% | 84.7% |
| 1989 | 39.4% | 84.5% |
| 1988 | 39.6% | 84.3% |
| 1987 | 38.3% | 84% |
| 1986 | 36.6% | 83.8% |
| 1985 | 35% | 83.7% |
| 1984 | 33.4% | 83.6% |
| 1983 | 31.8% | 83.6% |
| 1982 | 30.3% | 83.6% |
| 1981 | 28.8% | 83.5% |
| 1980 | 27.4% | 83.4% |
| 1979 | 26% | 83.3% |
| 1978 | 24.6% | 83.2% |
| 1977 | 23.3% | 83.1% |
| 1976 | 22% | 83% |
| 1975 | 20.6% | 82.8% |
| 1974 | 19.2% | 82.5% |
| 1973 | 18% | 82.1% |
| 1972 | 16.8% | 81.8% |
| 1971 | 15.6% | 81.5% |
| 1970 | 14.6% | 81.1% |
| 1969 | 13.6% | 80.7% |
| 1968 | 12.6% | 80.3% |
| 1967 | 11.7% | 79.9% |
| 1966 | 10.9% | 79.4% |
| 1965 | 10.1% | 78.9% |
| 1964 | 9.36% | 78.3% |
| 1963 | 8.67% | 77.7% |
| 1962 | 8.03% | 77.1% |
| 1961 | 7.44% | 76.5% |
| 1960 | 6.88% | 76% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 41.2% to 58.5% in Mauritania and from 86.3% to 87.1% in New Zealand.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Auckland | 1.47M |
| Christchurch | 383K |
| Wellington | 216K |
| Hamilton | 176K |
| Tauranga | 151K |
| Dunedin | 106K |
| Lower Hutt | 103K |
| Palmerston North | 81.5K |
| Napier | 66.3K |
| Porirua | 59.6K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons