Chile has a population density of 69.6 people per square mile compared to 203.8 people in Lesotho. Chile has 411,774 sq ft of land per person vs 139,786 sq ft in Lesotho. Chile and Lesotho rank 162nd and 115th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Chile has 0.24% of the world's population and 0.5% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.02% of the land area for Lesotho, making the population density in Chile 65.9% lower than in Lesotho.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Chile
|
Lesotho
|
|
| 2026 | 69.6 | 203.8 |
| 2025 | 69.3 | 201.6 |
| 2024 | 68.9 | 199.4 |
| 2023 | 68.5 | 197.2 |
| 2022 | 68.2 | 195 |
| 2021 | 67.8 | 192.9 |
| 2020 | 67.5 | 190.7 |
| 2019 | 66.9 | 188.5 |
| 2018 | 65.9 | 186.3 |
| 2017 | 64.8 | 184 |
| 2016 | 63.7 | 181.7 |
| 2015 | 63 | 179.5 |
| 2014 | 62.4 | 177.5 |
| 2013 | 61.6 | 175.4 |
| 2012 | 61 | 173.5 |
| 2011 | 60.4 | 171.8 |
| 2010 | 59.8 | 170.3 |
| 2009 | 59.3 | 169 |
| 2008 | 58.7 | 167.8 |
| 2007 | 58.1 | 166.6 |
| 2006 | 57.5 | 165.9 |
| 2005 | 56.9 | 166.6 |
| 2004 | 56.4 | 168.2 |
| 2003 | 55.8 | 169.3 |
| 2002 | 55.2 | 170.2 |
| 2001 | 54.6 | 170.7 |
| 2000 | 54 | 171 |
| 1999 | 53.4 | 170.9 |
| 1998 | 52.7 | 170.5 |
| 1997 | 52 | 169.6 |
| 1996 | 51.3 | 168.3 |
| 1995 | 50.6 | 166.5 |
| 1994 | 49.9 | 164.5 |
| 1993 | 49.1 | 162.2 |
| 1992 | 48.4 | 159.8 |
| 1991 | 47.6 | 157.2 |
| 1990 | 46.8 | 154.4 |
| 1989 | 46 | 151.5 |
| 1988 | 45.3 | 148.4 |
| 1987 | 44.6 | 145.3 |
| 1986 | 43.9 | 142.1 |
| 1985 | 43.2 | 138.6 |
| 1984 | 42.5 | 134.7 |
| 1983 | 41.9 | 130.9 |
| 1982 | 41.3 | 127.2 |
| 1981 | 40.7 | 123.5 |
| 1980 | 40.1 | 120 |
| 1979 | 39.5 | 116.5 |
| 1978 | 38.9 | 113.2 |
| 1977 | 38.3 | 110 |
| 1976 | 37.8 | 106.9 |
| 1975 | 37.2 | 103.5 |
| 1974 | 36.6 | 100 |
| 1973 | 36 | 96.6 |
| 1972 | 35.4 | 93.3 |
| 1971 | 34.9 | 90.1 |
| 1970 | 34.3 | 87 |
| 1969 | 33.7 | 83.9 |
| 1968 | 33.1 | 80.9 |
| 1967 | 32.6 | 78 |
| 1966 | 32 | 75.2 |
| 1965 | 31.4 | 72.9 |
| 1964 | 30.8 | 70.8 |
| 1963 | 30.2 | 68.7 |
| 1962 | 29.6 | 66.7 |
| 1961 | 29 | 64.7 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/chile/lesotho | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Chile increased by 21%, compared to a 22.9% growth in Lesotho.
In 2006, Chile ranked 156th by population density and is 162nd now. Lesotho was 113th in 2006 and ranks 115th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Chile
|
Lesotho
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 69.6 ppl/mi² | 203.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 162/197 | 115/197 |
| Population |
19977856
|
2396633
|
| Land area | 286,809 sq mi | 11,722 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 404,547 sq ft | 139,809 sq ft |
| Rural population | 11% | 56.3% |
| Urban population | 89% | 43.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 31.3% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Chile
|
Lesotho
|
|
| 2024 | 89% | 43.7% |
| 2023 | 88.8% | 42.7% |
| 2022 | 88.6% | 41.7% |
| 2021 | 88.5% | 40.7% |
| 2020 | 88.3% | 39.6% |
| 2019 | 88.1% | 38.6% |
| 2018 | 88% | 37.6% |
| 2017 | 87.8% | 36.5% |
| 2016 | 87.6% | 35.5% |
| 2015 | 87.5% | 34.1% |
| 2014 | 87.3% | 32.6% |
| 2013 | 87.2% | 31.2% |
| 2012 | 87.1% | 29.9% |
| 2011 | 87% | 28.6% |
| 2010 | 87% | 27.4% |
| 2009 | 86.9% | 26.3% |
| 2008 | 86.9% | 25.2% |
| 2007 | 86.8% | 24.2% |
| 2006 | 86.8% | 23.3% |
| 2005 | 86.8% | 22.5% |
| 2004 | 86.7% | 21.8% |
| 2003 | 86.7% | 21.1% |
| 2002 | 86.6% | 20.5% |
| 2001 | 86.5% | 19.9% |
| 2000 | 86.3% | 19.3% |
| 1999 | 86% | 18.8% |
| 1998 | 85.6% | 18.2% |
| 1997 | 85.2% | 17.7% |
| 1996 | 84.8% | 17.1% |
| 1995 | 84.4% | 16.5% |
| 1994 | 84% | 15.8% |
| 1993 | 83.7% | 15% |
| 1992 | 83.5% | 14.3% |
| 1991 | 83.3% | 13.6% |
| 1990 | 83.2% | 12.9% |
| 1989 | 83.1% | 12.3% |
| 1988 | 83% | 11.8% |
| 1987 | 82.9% | 11.5% |
| 1986 | 82.8% | 11.3% |
| 1985 | 82.7% | 11.3% |
| 1984 | 82.6% | 11.3% |
| 1983 | 82.4% | 11.3% |
| 1982 | 82.3% | 11.2% |
| 1981 | 82% | 11.2% |
| 1980 | 81.7% | 11.2% |
| 1979 | 81.2% | 11.2% |
| 1978 | 80.7% | 11.2% |
| 1977 | 80.1% | 11.2% |
| 1976 | 79.5% | 11.2% |
| 1975 | 78.8% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 78.1% | 10.9% |
| 1973 | 77.4% | 10.6% |
| 1972 | 76.7% | 10.2% |
| 1971 | 75.9% | 9.75% |
| 1970 | 75.3% | 9.22% |
| 1969 | 74.6% | 8.68% |
| 1968 | 73.9% | 8.12% |
| 1967 | 73.2% | 7.59% |
| 1966 | 72.5% | 7.1% |
| 1965 | 71.8% | 6.62% |
| 1964 | 71% | 6.07% |
| 1963 | 70.3% | 5.47% |
| 1962 | 69.5% | 4.86% |
| 1961 | 68.7% | 4.24% |
| 1960 | 67.8% | 3.66% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/chile/lesotho | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 86.7% to 89% in Chile and from 21.8% to 43.7% in Lesotho.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/chile/lesotho | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2001–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.