Eswatini has a population density of 191.2 people per square mile compared to 894 people in Grenada. Eswatini has 150,387 sq ft of land per person vs 32,005 sq ft in Grenada. Eswatini and Grenada rank 118th and 27th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Eswatini has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.001% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Grenada, making the population density in Eswatini 78.6% lower than in Grenada.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Eswatini
|
Grenada
|
|
| 2026 | 191.2 | 894 |
| 2025 | 189.1 | 894 |
| 2024 | 187.1 | 893 |
| 2023 | 185.3 | 892 |
| 2022 | 183.5 | 891 |
| 2021 | 181.7 | 889 |
| 2020 | 179.6 | 886 |
| 2019 | 177.7 | 883 |
| 2018 | 176 | 881 |
| 2017 | 174.4 | 879 |
| 2016 | 173.1 | 877 |
| 2015 | 172.1 | 874 |
| 2014 | 171.1 | 869 |
| 2013 | 170.2 | 864 |
| 2012 | 169.2 | 859 |
| 2011 | 168.3 | 854 |
| 2010 | 167.4 | 850 |
| 2009 | 166.4 | 847 |
| 2008 | 165.4 | 845 |
| 2007 | 164.2 | 842 |
| 2006 | 163.3 | 839 |
| 2005 | 162.5 | 836 |
| 2004 | 161.6 | 833 |
| 2003 | 160.6 | 829 |
| 2002 | 159.5 | 826 |
| 2001 | 158.3 | 823 |
| 2000 | 156.8 | 819 |
| 1999 | 155.2 | 813 |
| 1998 | 153.5 | 808 |
| 1997 | 151.6 | 802 |
| 1996 | 149.1 | 797 |
| 1995 | 146.1 | 791 |
| 1994 | 146.2 | 786 |
| 1993 | 146.3 | 780 |
| 1992 | 142.1 | 774 |
| 1991 | 136.8 | 768 |
| 1990 | 131.4 | 761 |
| 1989 | 126.2 | 755 |
| 1988 | 120.4 | 749 |
| 1987 | 115 | 743 |
| 1986 | 110.6 | 737 |
| 1985 | 106.3 | 732 |
| 1984 | 102.5 | 727 |
| 1983 | 99.2 | 723 |
| 1982 | 96 | 719 |
| 1981 | 92.9 | 716 |
| 1980 | 89.8 | 720 |
| 1979 | 86.9 | 727 |
| 1978 | 84.1 | 734 |
| 1977 | 81.4 | 739 |
| 1976 | 78.8 | 744 |
| 1975 | 76.4 | 747 |
| 1974 | 74.2 | 750 |
| 1973 | 72.1 | 752 |
| 1972 | 70.1 | 752 |
| 1971 | 68.2 | 751 |
| 1970 | 66.4 | 750 |
| 1969 | 64.7 | 748 |
| 1968 | 63.1 | 747 |
| 1967 | 61.6 | 747 |
| 1966 | 60 | 747 |
| 1965 | 58.5 | 747 |
| 1964 | 57 | 745 |
| 1963 | 55.7 | 740 |
| 1962 | 54.4 | 734 |
| 1961 | 53.2 | 726 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/eswatini/grenada | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Eswatini increased by 17.1%, compared to a 6.6% growth in Grenada.
In 2006, Eswatini ranked 114th by population density and is 118th now. Grenada was 26th in 2006 and ranks 27th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Eswatini
|
Grenada
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 191.2 ppl/mi² | 894 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 118/197 | 27/197 |
| Population |
1273390
|
117407
|
| Land area | 6,641 sq mi | 131.3 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 148,967 sq ft | 31,224 sq ft |
| Rural population | 73.8% | 63.4% |
| Urban population | 26.2% | 36.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Eswatini
|
Grenada
|
|
| 2024 | 26.2% | 36.6% |
| 2023 | 25.8% | 36.5% |
| 2022 | 25.4% | 36.4% |
| 2021 | 25% | 36.3% |
| 2020 | 24.7% | 36.2% |
| 2019 | 24.3% | 36.1% |
| 2018 | 24.1% | 36.1% |
| 2017 | 23.8% | 36% |
| 2016 | 23.5% | 36% |
| 2015 | 23.3% | 35.9% |
| 2014 | 23% | 35.9% |
| 2013 | 22.8% | 35.9% |
| 2012 | 22.6% | 35.9% |
| 2011 | 22.5% | 35.9% |
| 2010 | 22.3% | 35.9% |
| 2009 | 22.2% | 35.9% |
| 2008 | 22.2% | 35.9% |
| 2007 | 22.1% | 35.9% |
| 2006 | 22.2% | 35.9% |
| 2005 | 22.2% | 35.9% |
| 2004 | 22.3% | 35.9% |
| 2003 | 22.4% | 35.9% |
| 2002 | 22.6% | 35.9% |
| 2001 | 22.7% | 35.9% |
| 2000 | 22.8% | 35.9% |
| 1999 | 23% | 35.7% |
| 1998 | 23% | 35.5% |
| 1997 | 23.1% | 35.2% |
| 1996 | 23.1% | 34.8% |
| 1995 | 23.1% | 34.5% |
| 1994 | 23% | 34.2% |
| 1993 | 23% | 33.9% |
| 1992 | 23% | 33.6% |
| 1991 | 23% | 33.5% |
| 1990 | 22.9% | 33.4% |
| 1989 | 22.9% | 33.3% |
| 1988 | 22.9% | 33.3% |
| 1987 | 22.8% | 33.2% |
| 1986 | 22.7% | 33.2% |
| 1985 | 22.5% | 33.2% |
| 1984 | 22.1% | 33.1% |
| 1983 | 21.4% | 33.1% |
| 1982 | 20.6% | 33% |
| 1981 | 19.7% | 33% |
| 1980 | 18.8% | 32.9% |
| 1979 | 17.8% | 32.9% |
| 1978 | 16.8% | 32.8% |
| 1977 | 15.9% | 32.7% |
| 1976 | 15.1% | 32.7% |
| 1975 | 14.3% | 32.6% |
| 1974 | 13.5% | 32.6% |
| 1973 | 12.6% | 32.5% |
| 1972 | 11.8% | 32.4% |
| 1971 | 10.9% | 32.3% |
| 1970 | 10.1% | 32.2% |
| 1969 | 9.25% | 32.1% |
| 1968 | 8.49% | 32% |
| 1967 | 7.79% | 31.8% |
| 1966 | 7.16% | 31.6% |
| 1965 | 6.59% | 31.4% |
| 1964 | 6.03% | 31.2% |
| 1963 | 5.5% | 31% |
| 1962 | 4.99% | 30.8% |
| 1961 | 4.51% | 30.6% |
| 1960 | 4.06% | 30.4% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/eswatini/grenada | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 22.3% to 26.2% in Eswatini and from 35.9% to 36.6% in Grenada.
Densely populated cities
|
Eswatini
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Manzini | 111K |
| Mbabane | 76.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/eswatini/grenada | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2005–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.